Adamson, H. D. (2009) Interlanguage
variation in theoretical and pedagogical
perspective. New York, NY: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Adli, A., García, M. G., & Kaufmann, G. (Eds.). (2015) Variation
in language: System-and usage-based
approaches (Vol. 50). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alderson, J. C., Brunfaut, T., & Harding, L. (2014). Towards
a theory of diagnosis in second and foreign language assessment: Insights
from professional practice across diverse
fields. Applied
Linguistics, 36(2), 236–260. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anton, M. (2009). Dynamic
assessment of advanced second language
learners. Foreign Language
Annals, 42(3), 576–598. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bailey, C. J. N. (1973) Variation
and linguistic theory. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bettoni, C., & Di Biase, B. (Eds.). (2015). Grammatical
development in second languages: Exploring the boundaries of Processability
Theory (EUROSLA Monographs Series
3). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: European Second Language Association. Retrieved on 3 February 2021
from [URL]![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bickerton, D. (1975) Dynamics
of a creole system. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bickerton, D. (1981) Roots
of language. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma Publishers.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bresnan, J. (Ed.). (1982) The
mental representation of grammatical
relations. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bresnan, J., Asudeh, A., Toivonen, I., & Wechsler, S. (2015). Lexical-functional
syntax (Vol. 16). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, J. (2006) From
usage to grammar: The mind’s response to
repetition. Language, 82(4), 711–733. Retrieved
on 3 February 2021 from [URL]. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (2013). Researching
pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and
testing. New York, NY: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cancino, H., Rosansky, E., & Schumann, J. (1978). The
acquisition of English negatives and interrogatives by native Spanish
speakers. In E. Hatch (Ed.), Second
language acquisition: A book of
readings (pp. 207–230). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Charters, H., Dao, L., & Jansen, L. (2011). Reassessing
the applicability of Processability Theory: The case of nominal
plural. Second Language
Research, 27(4), 509–533. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects
of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clahsen, H., Meisel, J., & Pienemann, M. (1983). Deutsch
als Zweitsprache. Der
Spracherwerb ausländischer
Arbeiter. Tübingen, Germany: Narr.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Corder, S. P. (1981). Formal
simplicity and functional
simplification. In R. W. Andersen (Ed.), New
dimensions in second language acquisition
research (pp. 146–152). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crystal, D. (2011). A
dictionary of linguistics and
phonetics (Vol. 30). Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dalrymple, M. (2001). Syntax
and semantics: Vol. 34. Lexical functional
grammar. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A
dynamic systems theory approach to second language
acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and
Cognition, 10(1), 7–21. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DeCamp, D. (1973). Implicational
scales and sociolinguistic
linearity. Linguistics, 73, 30–43.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dewaele, J. M., Petrides, K. V., & Furnham, A. (2008). Effects
of trait emotional intelligence and sociobiographical variables on
communicative anxiety and foreign language anxiety among adult
multilinguals: A review and empirical
investigation. Language
Learning, 58(4), 911–960. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Di Biase, B., & Kawaguchi, S. (2002). Exploring
the typological plausibility of Processability Theory: Language development
in Italian second language and Japanese second
language. Second Language
Research, 18, 272–300. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Di Biase, B., Kawaguchi, S., & Yamaguchi, Y. (2015). The
development of English as a Second
Language. In C. Bettoni & B. Di Biase (Eds.), Grammatical
development in second languages: Exploring the boundaries of Processability
Theory (EUROSLA Monographs
Series 3, pp. 85–115). Amsterdam, The Netherlands. European Second Language Association. Retrieved on 3
February from [URL]![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dickerson, L. J. (1975). The
learner’s interlanguage as a system of variable
rules. TESOL
Quarterly, 9(4), 401–407. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dörnyei, Z. (2014). The
psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second
language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dulay, H. C., & Burt, M. K. (1974). Natural
sequences in child second language
acquisition. Language
Learning, 24(1), 37–53. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dyson, B. P.. (2005). Developmental style
in second language processing: A study of inter-learner variation in the
acquisition of English as a Second
Language (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation). University of Western Sydney, Australia.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dyson, B. P.. (2009). Processability
Theory and the role of morphology in ESL development: A longitudinal
study. Second Language
Research, 25, 355–376.
Dyson, B. P.. (2010). Learner
language analytic methods and pedagogical
implications. Australian Review of Applied
Linguistics, 33(3), 30.1–30.21. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Dyson, B. P.. (2018). Developmental
sequences. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.-in-Chief), The
TESOL encyclopedia of English language
teaching (8 Vols). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Edwards, J. G. H. (2011). Deletion
of /t, d/ and the acquisition of linguistic variation by second language
learners of English. Language
Learning, 61(4), 1256–1301. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, N. C., O’Donnell, M. B., & Römer, U. (2013). Usage-based
language: Investigating the latent structures that underpin
acquisition. Language
Learning, 63(1), 25–51. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, R. (1985a). A
variable competence model of second language
acquisition. International Review of Applied
Linguistics in Language
Teaching, 23(1-4), 47–59. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, R. (1985b). Sources
of variability in interlanguage. Applied
Linguistics, 6(2), 118–31. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, R. (1994). The
study of second language acquisition. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, R. (1999). Item
versus system learning: Explaining free
variation. Applied
Linguistics, 20(4), 460–480. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, R. (2004). Individual
differences in second language
learning. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), The
handbook of applied
linguistics (pp. 525–551). Malden, MA: Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eskildsen, S. W. (2015). What
counts as a developmental sequence? Exemplar-based L2 learning of English
questions. Language
Learning, 65(1), 33–62. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fedzechkina, M., Newport, E. L., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016). Miniature
artificial language learning as a complement to typological
data. In L. Ortega, E. Tyler, H. I. Park, & M. Uno (Eds.), The
usage-based study of language learning and
multilingualism (pp. 211–234). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gatbonton, E. (1978). Patterned
phonetic variability in second-language speech: A gradual diffusion
model. The Canadian Modern Language
Review, 34(3), 335–347. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geeslin, K. L. (2003). A
comparison of copula choice: Native Spanish speakers and advanced
learners. Language
Learning, 53(4), 703–764. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geeslin, K. L., & Guijarro-Fuentes, P. (2006). Second
language acquisition of variable structures in Spanish by Portuguese
speakers. Language
Learning, 56(1), 53–107. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geeslin, K. L., & Long, A. Y. (2014). Sociolinguistics
and second language acquisition: Learning to use language in
context. New York, NY: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gnevsheva, K. (2017). Within-speaker
variation in passing for a native
speaker. International Journal of
Bilingualism, 21(2), 213–227. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guttman, L. (1944). A
basis for scaling qualitative data. American
Sociological
Review, 9(2), 139–150. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Håkansson, G., & Norrby, C. (2010). Environmental
influence on language acquisition: Comparing second and foreign language
acquisition of Swedish. Language
Learning, 60(3), 628–650. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hawkins, R. (2001). Second
language syntax: A generative
introduction. Oxford, England: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huebner, T. (1983). A
longitudinal analysis of the acquisition of
English. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma Publishers.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huebner, T. (1985). System
and variability in interlanguage
syntax. Language
Learning, 35(2), 141–163. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hulstijn, J. H., Ellis, R., & Eskildsen, S. W. (2015). Orders
and sequences in the acquisition of L2 morphosyntax, 40 years on: An
introduction to the special issue. Language
Learning, 65(1), 1–5. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Itani-Adams, Y. (2009). Development
of discourse functions in Japanese and English bilingual first language
acquisition. In J.-U. Keßler & D. Keatinge (Eds.), Research
in second language acquisition: Empirical evidence across
languages (pp. 41–68). Newcastle upon Tyne, England: Cambridge Scholars.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnston, M. (1985). Syntactic
and morphological progressions in learner
English. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth Department of Immigration and Ethnic Affairs.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnston, M. 1994. Second
Language Acquisition: A Classroom
Perspective. Sydney, NLLIA Language Acquisition Research Centre, University of Western Sydney.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnston, M. (1997). Development
and variation in learner language (Unpublished
doctoral dissertation). Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labov, W. (1969). The
study of language in its social
context. Studium
Generale, 23, 30-87.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labov, W. (1970). The
study of language in its social
context. In Studium
Generale, (Vol. 23, pp. 30–87).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labov, W. (1972a). Sociolinguistic
patterns (No. 4). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labov, W. (1972b). The
internal evolution of linguistic
rules. In R. P. Stockwell & R. K. S. Macaulay (Eds.), Linguistic
change and generative
theory (pp. 101–171). London, England: Bloomington.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2012). Complex,
dynamic systems: A new transdisciplinary theme for applied
linguistics? Language
Teaching, 45(2), 202–214. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. H. (1991). An
introduction to second language acquisition
research. London, England: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lenzing, A. (2015). Exploring
regularities and dynamic systems in L2
development. Language
Learning, 65(1), 89–122. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking:
From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levelt, W. J. M, Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A
theory of lexical access in speech
production. Behavioral and Brain
Sciences, 22(1), 1–38. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liebner, M., & Pienemann, M. (2011). Explaining
learner
variation. In M. Pienemann & J-U. Keßler (Eds.), Studying
Processability Theory: An introductory
textbook (pp. 64–67). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2015). Variability
and variation in acquisition orders: A dynamic
reevaluation. Language
Learning, 65(1), 63–88. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
MacWhinney, B. (1987). The
competition
model. In Mechanisms
of Language
Acquisition (pp. 249–308). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marijuan, S., Lago, S., & Sanz, C. (2016). Can
English-Spanish emerging bilinguals use agreement morphology to overcome
word order
bias? In L. Ortega, E. Tyler, H. I. Park, & M. Uno (Eds.), The
usage-based study of language learning and
multilingualism (pp. 189–210). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meisel, J. M. (1977). The
language of foreign workers in
Germany. In C. H. Molony, H. Zobl, & W. Stolting (Eds.), Deutsch
im Kontakt mit anderen
Sprachen (pp. 184–212). Kronborg, Denmark: Scriptor-Verlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meisel, J. M. (1980). Linguistic
simplification: A study of immigrant workers’ speech and foreigner
talk. In S. W. Felix (Ed.), Second
language development: Trends and
issues (pp. 13–40). Tübingen, Germany: Narr.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meisel, J. M. (1983). Strategies
of second language acquisition: More than one kind of
simplification. In R. W. Anderson (Ed.), Pidginization
and creolization as language
acquisition (pp. 120–157). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meisel, J. M., Clahsen, H., & Pienemann, M. (1981). On
determining developmental stages in natural second language
acquisition. Studies in Second Language
Acquisition, 3(2), 109–135. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Norrby, C. & Håkansson, G. (2007). The
interaction of complexity and PT-level: The case of Swedish as a Foreign
Language. International Review of Applied
Linguistics, 45, 45-68. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ortega, L. (2003). Syntactic
complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research
synthesis of college-level L2
writing. Applied
Linguistics, 24(4), 492–518. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ortega, L. (2014). Understanding
second language acquisition. New York, NY: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ortega, L., & Tyler, A. E. (2016). The
vibrant and expanded study of usage-based study of language learning
and
multilingualism. In Ortega,
L., Tyler, A. E., Park, H. I., & Uno, M. (Eds.), The
usage-based study of language learning and
multilingualism (pp. 1–12). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ortega, L., Tyler, A. E., Park, H. I., & Uno, M. (Eds.). (2016). The
usage-based study of language learning and
multilingualism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pallotti, G. (2007). An
operational definition of the emergence
criterion. Applied
Linguistics, 28(3), 361–382. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pavlenko, A., Blackledge, A., Piller, I., & Teutsch-Dwyer, M. (Eds.). (2011). Multilingualism,
second language learning, and
gender (Vol. 6). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pica, T., Kanagy, R. & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing
and using communication tasks for second language instruction and
research. In G. Crookes & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks
and language learning: Integrating theory and
practice (Vol. 93, pp. 9–34). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pienemann, M. (1980). The
second language acquisition of immigrant
children. In S. W. Felix (Ed.), Second
language development: Trends and
issues (pp. 41–56). Tübingen, Germany: Narr.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pienemann, M. (1981). Der
Zweitspracherwerb ausländischer Arbeiterkinder [The
second language acquisition of the children of foreign
workers]. Bonn, Germany: Bouvier.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pienemann, M. (1984). Psychological
constraints on the teachability of
languages. Studies in Second Language
Acquisition, 6, 186–214. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pienemann, M. (2011a). Developmental
schedules. In M. Pienemann & J.-U. Keßler (Eds.), Studying
Processability Theory: An introductory
textbook (pp. 1–11). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pienemann, M. (2011). Learner
variation. In M. Pienemann & J-U. Keßler (Eds.), Studying
Processability Theory: An introductory
textbook (pp. 12–24). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pienemann, M. (2015). An
outline of Processability Theory and its relationship to other approaches to
SLA. Language
Learning, 65(1), 123–151. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pienemann, M., Di Biase, B., & Kawaguchi, S. (2005). Extending
Processability
Theory. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic
aspects of Processability
Theory (pp. 199–251). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pienemann, M., & Johnston, M. (1987). Factors
influencing the development of language
proficiency. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Applying
second language acquisition
research (pp. 45–141). Adelaide, Australia: National Curriculum Research Centre, Adult Migrant Education Program.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pienemann, M., Johnston, M., & Brindley, G. (1988). Constructing
an acquisition-based procedure for second language
assessment. Studies in Second Language
Acquisition, 10(2), 217–243. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pienemann, M., & Mackey, A. (1993). An
empirical study of children’s ESL development and rapid
profile. In P. McKay (Ed.), ESL
development: Language and literacy in
schools (Vol. 2, pp. 115–259). Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia and National Languages and Literacy Institute of Australia.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Preston, D. R. (1993). Variation
linguistics and SLA. Second Language
Research, 9(2), 153–172. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Preston, D. R. (2002). A
variationist perspective on second language acquisition: Psycholinguistic
concerns. In R. B. Kaplan (Ed.), The
Oxford handbook of applied
linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Regan, V. (2013). Variation. In J. Herschensohn & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), The
Cambridge handbook for second language
acquisition (pp. 272–291). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Romaine, S. (2008). Variation. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The
handbook of second language
acquisition (Vol. 27, pp. 409–435). Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sakai, H. (2008). An
analysis of Japanese university students’ oral performance in English using
Processability
Theory. System, 36(4), 534–549. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F. (2006). Anaphora
resolution in near-native speakers of
Italian. Second Language
Research, 22(3), 339–368. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spinner, P. (2013). Language
production and reception: A Processability Theory
study. Language
Learning, 63(4), 704–739. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spoelman, M., & Verspoor, M. (2010). Dynamic
patterns in development of accuracy and complexity: A longitudinal case
study in the acquisition of Finnish. Applied
Linguistics, 31(4), 532–553. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stauble, A. M. (1984). A
comparison of a Spanish-English and a Japanese-English second language
continuum: Negation and verb
morphology. In R. Andersen (Ed.), Second
languages: A cross-linguistic
perspective (pp. 323–353). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tarone, E. (1980): "Communication
strategies, foreigner talk and repair in
interlanguage", Language
Learning, 30, 417-31.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tarone, E. (1983). On
the variability of interlanguage
systems. Applied
Linguistics, 4(2), 142–164. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tarone, E. (1985). Variability
in interlanguage use: A study of style-shifting in morphology and
syntax. Language
Learning, 35(3), 373–403. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tarone, E. (1988). Variation
in interlanguage. London, England: Edward Arnold.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tsimpli, I. M. (2006). Variation
in SLA. In Encyclopedia of language and
linguistics (2nd ed.)
(pp. 387–394). Oxford, England: Elsevier. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vainikka, A., & Young-Scholten, M. (1996). Gradual
development of L2 phrase structure. Second
Language
Research, 12(1), 7–39. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Dijk, M., Verspoor, M. H., & Lowie, W. (2011). Variability
and DST. In M. Verspoor, K. de Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.), A
dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and
techniques (pp. 55–84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., & Van Dijk, M. (2008). Variability
in second language development from a dynamic systems
perspective. The Modern Language
Journal, 92(2), 214–231. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Verspoor, M., Schmid, M. S., & Xu, X. (2012). A
dynamic usage based perspective on L2
writing. Journal of Second Language
Writing, 21(3), 239–263. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wulff, S., & Ellis, N. C. (2015). Usage-based
approaches to second language
acquisition. In B. Van Patten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories
of second language acquisition: An
Introduction (pp. 37-56). New York: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wulff, S., & Ellis, N. C. (2018). Usage-based
approaches to second language
acquisition. In D. Miller, F. Bayram, J. Rothman & L. Serratrice (Eds.), Bilingual
cognition and language: The state of the science across its
subfields (pp.37-57). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weinreich, U., Labov, W., & Herzog, M. (1968). Empirical
foundations for a theory of language
change. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
White, L. (2003). Second
language acquisition and universal
grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wulff, S. (2016). A
friendly conspiracy of input, L1, and processing demands:
That variation in the language of German and Spanish
learners of
English. In L. Ortega, A. E.,
Tyler, H. I. Park, & M. Uno (Eds.), The
usage-based study of language learning and
multilingualism (pp. 115–134). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yamaguchi, Y. (2008). The
early syntactic development in child L2 acquisition: What happens after
“canonical
order”? In J.-U. Keßler (Ed.), Processability
approaches to second language development and second language
learning (pp. 247–268). Newcastle upon Tyne, England: Cambridge Scholars.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yamaguchi, Y. (2009). The
development of plural marking and plural agreement in child English L2
acquisition. In J.-U. Keßler & D. Keatinge (Eds.), Research
in second language acquisition: Empirical evidence across
languages (pp. 9–39). Newcastle upon Tyne, England: Cambridge Scholars.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Young, R. (1993). Functional
constraints on variation interlanguage
morphology. Applied
Linguistics, 14(1), 76–97. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zafar, S., & Meenakshi, K. (2012). Individual
learner differences and second language acquisition: A
review. Journal of Language Teaching &
Research, 3(4), 639–646. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zhang, Y. (2001). Second
language acquisition of Chinese grammatical morphemes: A Processability
Theory perspective (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation). Canberra, Australia: Australian National University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zhang, Y., & Widyastuti, I. (2010). Acquisition
of L2 English morphology: A family case
study. Australian Review of Applied
Linguistics, 33(3), 29.1–29.17. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)