On Speech Act Verbs
This essay concerns the analysis of speech act verbs. It offers a range of ideas which form theoretical preliminaries to the analysis of this phenomenon.
[Pragmatics & Beyond, I:4] 1980. viii, 83 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
Introduction
|
1
|
|
1. What are Speech Act Verbs?
|
3
|
|
1.0 Introduction
|
3
|
|
1.1 Speech act verbs and their grammatical behavior
|
6
|
|
1.2 The performativity continuum
|
14
|
|
1.3 Summary
|
18
|
|
2. Why bother about Speech Act Verbs?
|
19
|
|
2.1 Introduction
|
19
|
|
2.1 Some reasons to study speech acts
|
20
|
|
2.2 Some faits divers
|
23
|
|
2.3 Some reasons to study speech act verbs
|
33
|
|
2.4 Summary
|
42
|
|
3. How to Analyze Speech Act Verbs
|
43
|
|
3.0 Introduction
|
43
|
|
3.1 The unifying feature of speech act verbs
|
45
|
|
3.2 Some evidence
|
48
|
|
3.3 The magical formula
|
51
|
|
3.4 Some stuffing for the formula
|
57
|
|
3.5 Summary
|
60
|
|
4. How to Account for the Non-Typical Cases
|
63
|
|
4.0 Introduction
|
63
|
|
4.1 The problem illustrated
|
64
|
|
4.2 A possible solution
|
66
|
|
4.3 Summary
|
71
|
|
5. Conclusion
|
73
|
|
Footnotes
|
75
|
|
References
|
79
|
Cited by
Cited by 14 other publications
Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed
2020. Do political cartoons and illustrations have their own specialized forms for warnings, threats, and the like? Speech acts in the nonverbal mode.
Social Semiotics ► pp. 1 ff. 
Astington, Janet W. & David R. Olson
1990. Metacognitive and Metalinguistic Language: Learning to Talk about Thought.
Applied Psychology 39:1 ► pp. 77 ff.
Callebaut, Bruno
1994. La négation et les théories de l'illocutoire.
Linx :5 ► pp. 191 ff.
Castor, Theresa & Mariaelena Bartesaghi
2016. Metacommunication During Disaster Response.
Management Communication Quarterly 30:4 ► pp. 472 ff.
Cicognani, Anna & Mary Lou Maher
1997.
In CAAD futures 1997,
► pp. 707 ff.
Großkopf, Anja & Gisela Harras
2000.
In Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung,
► pp. 273 ff.
Kim, Sanghee, Wendy Hall & Andy Keane
2002.
In Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning — IDEAL 2002 [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2412],
► pp. 161 ff.
Lee, Patricia A.
1989. Form and Function in Illocutionary Acts.
Journal of English Linguistics 22:2 ► pp. 216 ff.
Mey, Jacob L.
2016.
In Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 9],
► pp. 133 ff.
Monville-Burston, Monique & Linda R. Waugh
1998. Lexicon, genre and local discourse organisation: French speech act verbs and journalistic texts.
Journal of French Language Studies 8:1 ► pp. 45 ff.
Nezakat-Alhossaini, Marzieh & Abbass Esslami-Rasekh
2013. “May Bread Run and You Run After It”: The Function of Cursing in Persian.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 70 ► pp. 517 ff.
Nuessel, Frank
2017. The Traffic Sign as A Sign.
International Journal of Semiotics and Visual Rhetoric 1:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Radulović, Milica & Vladimir Ž. Jovanović
2020. The pragmeme of disagreement and its allopracts in English and Serbian political interview discourse.
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:4 ► pp. 586 ff.
Swiggers, Pierre
1986.
In The Semiotic Sphere,
► pp. 343 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General