Pragmatics and the Philosophy of Mind
Vol. I: Thought in Language
This volume deals with the relation between pragmatics and the philosophy of mind. Unlike most of the books written on the subject, it does not defend the view that a specific form of dependence holds between language and thought, to the exclusion of all other possible relations. Taking pragmatics in its original sense of “that part of semiotics that is concerned with the users of a semiotic system”, the book analyses the nature of the mental processes and states mirrored in language use. Drawing on results from cognitive psychology, the philosophy of mind, the philosophy of language, linguistics, etc., a unified view of the mental dimension in the use of language, both as an instrument of communication and as an instrument of thought, is offered. After offering a tour d’horizon of the relationship between language and mind, this volume deals with the way thought is manifested in language.
[Pragmatics & Beyond, IV:1] 1983. xii, 207 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
Preface
|
xi
|
|
1. Introduction: Language – Mirror of the Mind
|
1
|
|
1.1. Variations on a theme
|
1
|
|
1.2. Functionalism
|
9
|
|
1.3. Pragmatics
|
20
|
|
1.4. Sociopragmatics, psychopragmatics, and the philosophy of mind
|
42
|
|
1.5. Language-in-use: Mirror of the mind
|
52
|
|
Part I Thought in Language
|
|
|
2. Transparency
|
61
|
|
2.1. The assumption of transparency
|
61
|
|
2.2. Speaking and listening
|
62
|
|
2.3. Naturalness
|
72
|
|
2.4. Pragmatic interpretation
|
77
|
|
2.5. Expressibility and context
|
85
|
|
2.6. The ascription of content
|
91
|
|
2.7. The transparency of discourse
|
105
|
|
2.8. Principles of transparency
|
113
|
|
3. Indirectness
|
127
|
|
3.1. Meaning something else
|
127
|
|
3.2. Toward a heuristics of indirect interpretation
|
138
|
|
3.3. Alternative meanings and alternative expressions
|
153
|
|
3.4. Why do we use indirectness?
|
158
|
|
Notes
|
165
|
|
References
|
183
|
|
Index
|
199
|
Cited by
Cited by 39 other publications
No author info given
1986. SEMANTIEK EN PRAGMATIEK.
South African Journal of Linguistics 4:sup3 ► pp. 1 ff. 
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
1993. “You gotta know how to tell a story”: Telling, tales, and tellers in American and Israeli narrative events at dinner.
Language in Society 22:3 ► pp. 361 ff.
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
1994. The Dynamics of Family Dinner Talk: Cultural Contexts for Children's Passages to Adult Discourse.
Research on Language & Social Interaction 27:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Cheng, Winnie & Martin Warren
2003. Indirectness, inexplicitness and vagueness made clearer.
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 13:3 ► pp. 381 ff.
Chudova, N. V.
2013. Understanding: A subject of inquiry and an object of modeling.
Scientific and Technical Information Processing 40:6 ► pp. 342 ff.
Colston, Herbert L. & Jennifer O'Brien
2000. Contrast of Kind Versus Contrast of Magnitude: The Pragmatic Accomplishments of Irony and Hyperbole.
Discourse Processes 30:2 ► pp. 179 ff.
Cuypers, Stefaan E.
1995.
In Handbook of Pragmatics,
► pp. 414 ff.
Cuypers, Stefaan E.
2010.
In Handbook of Pragmatics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Dascal, Marcelo
1987. Defending Literal Meaning.
Cognitive Science 11:3 ► pp. 259 ff.
Dascal, Marcelo
1988.
In Science in Reflection [Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 110],
► pp. 67 ff.
Dascal, Marcelo
1989. Artificial intelligence and philosophy: The knowledge of representation.
Systems Research 6:1 ► pp. 39 ff.
Dascal, Marcelo
1989. On the Roles of Context and Literal Meaning in Understanding.
Cognitive Science 13:2 ► pp. 253 ff.
Dascal, Marcelo
2013.
In Perspectives on Pragmatics and Philosophy [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 1],
► pp. 557 ff.
Dascal, Marcelo & Jerzy Wr�blewski
1988. Transparency and doubt: Understanding and interpretation in pragmatics and in law.
Law and Philosophy 7:2 ► pp. 203 ff.
de Zavala, Victor Sánchez
1992.
In Cognition, Semantics and Philosophy,
► pp. 129 ff.
Desilla, Louisa
2014. Reading between the lines, seeing beyond the images: an empirical study on the comprehension of implicit film dialogue meaning across cultures.
The Translator 20:2 ► pp. 194 ff.
Friedman, Elie
2017. Evasion strategies in international documents: when ‘constructive ambiguity’ leads to oppositional interpretation.
Critical Discourse Studies 14:4 ► pp. 385 ff.
Goldsworthy, Jeffrey
1995. Marmor on Meaning, Interpretation, and Legislative Intention.
Legal Theory 1:4 ► pp. 439 ff.
Grillo, Eric
2002.
In Phenomenology World-Wide,
► pp. 553 ff.
Gvura, Avi
2016. The need for the disjunction phrases in the legal contract
.
International Journal of Legal Discourse 1:2 ► pp. 319 ff.
Hirsch, Galia
2011. Explicitations and other types of shifts in the translation of irony and humor.
Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 23:2 ► pp. 178 ff.
Hirsch, Galia
2020.
In The Discourse of Indirectness [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 316],
► pp. 19 ff.
Hirsch, Galia & Enora Lessinger
2020. Obscuring the speaker’s stance: when explicitating results in implicitation.
Meta: Journal des traducteurs 65:3 ► pp. 745 ff.
Livnat, Zohar
2017. “There are no words that are ‘clear’ in and of themselves”: Meta-pragmatic comments and semantic analysis in legal interpretation
.
International Journal of Legal Discourse 2:1 ► pp. 153 ff.
Livnat, Zohar, Pnina Shukrun-Nagar & Galia Hirsch
2020.
In The Discourse of Indirectness [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 316],
► pp. 1 ff.
Lowhorn, Greg L.
2013. Review of Giuffrè (2011): Studies in Semiotic Textology in Honour of János S. Petöfi.
Pragmatics & Cognition 21:1 ► pp. 249 ff.
Mininni, Giuseppe, Rodolphe Ghiglione & Edith Sales-Wuillemin
1995. The intralocutor's diatextual frame.
Journal of Pragmatics 24:5 ► pp. 471 ff.
Raccah, Pierre-Yves
2015.
In Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 28],
► pp. 279 ff.
Stewart, John
1986. Speech and human being: A complement to semiotics.
Quarterly Journal of Speech 72:1 ► pp. 55 ff.
Tenbrink, Thora & Jan Wiener
2009. The verbalization of multiple strategies in a variant of the traveling salesperson problem.
Cognitive Processing 10:2 ► pp. 143 ff.
Turner, Ken
1995. The principal principles of pragmatic inference: co-operation.
Language Teaching 28:2 ► pp. 67 ff.
Turner, Ken
1996. The principal principles of pragmatic inference: politeness.
Language Teaching 29:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Vaezi, Rahim, Soudabeh Tabatabaei & Morteza Bakhtiarvand
2014. A Comparative Study of Speech-acts in the Textbooks by Native and Non-native Speakers: A Pragmatic Analysis of New Interchange Series vs. Locally-made EFL Textbooks.
Theory and Practice in Language Studies 4:1
Verschueren, Jef
1995.
In Handbook of Pragmatics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Verschueren, Jef
2012.
In Handbook of Pragmatics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Weigand, Edda
2016.
In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 4],
► pp. 209 ff.
Weizman, Elda
1995. Gorlée, Dinda L. 1994. Semiotics and the Problem of Translation, with Special Reference to the Semiotics of Charles S. Peirce..
Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 7:2 ► pp. 355 ff.
Weizman, Elda
1997. Review of Barbe (1991): Irony in Context.
Pragmatics & Cognition 5:2 ► pp. 371 ff.
Yakubinsky, Lev Petrovich & Michael Eskin
1997. On Dialogic Speech.
PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 112:2 ► pp. 243 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects & Metadata
Linguistics
Philosophy
BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General