News Interviews

• Acknowledgments | p. ix
• Transcription Notations and Abbreviations | p. x
• 1. Introduction | p. 1
• 1.1. Aim and Scope
• 1.2. The Corpus
• 1.3. Problems of Definition
• 1.4. Four Methods of Analysis
• 2. Aspects of Duration | p. 25
• 2.1. Quantificational Studies of Conversation
• 2.2. The “Matarazzo Effect” in News Interviews
• 2.3. Summary
• 3. The Structure of Interviews | p. 45
• 3.1. Flow-Chart Representation of the Structure of interviews
• 3.2. Limitations of a Structural Model
• 4. Conversational Inference | p. 61
• 4.1. Introduction
• 4.2. Pragmatic Principles
• 4.3. Pragmatic Scales in News Interviews
• 5. The Force of Questions | p. 99
• 5.1. Introduction
• 5.2. Syntactic Means of Force Reduction
• 5.3. Discourse Particles
• 5.4. Cohesion between Questions and Preceding Answers
• 5.5. Pragmatic Means of Weight Reduction
• 6. The Vagueness of Answers | p. 140
• 6.1. Explicit or Vague
• 6.2. Parenthetical Verbs
• 6.3. “Well” as a Qualifier
• 7. Conclusion | p. 161
• Appendix
• A. 4 Sample Interviews | p. 166
• B. Prefaces of Interview Questions | p. 177
• Notes | p. 181

Cited by 78 other publications

Al-Duleimi, Abbas Deygan Darweesh & Waleed Ridha Hammoodi

2015. A Pragmatic Study of Strategic Maneuvering in Selected Political Interviews. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 05:01 ► pp. 79 ff.

Amador-Moreno, Carolina P., Michael McCarthy & Anne O’Keeffe

2013. Can English Provide a Framework for Spanish Response Tokens?. In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2013 [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, 1], ► pp. 175 ff.

Beattie, Geoffrey

1989. Interruptions in Political Interviews: The Debate Ends?. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 8:5 ► pp. 345 ff.

Bell, Allan

1995. Language and the Media. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 15 ► pp. 23 ff.

Berlin, Lawrence N.

2008. “I Think, Therefore . . .”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 27:4 ► pp. 372 ff.

Blas Arroyo, José Luis

2022. Constraint factors in the formulation of questions in conflictual discourse. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 187 ff.

Blum-Kulka, Shoshana & Tamar Liebes

2000. Peres versus Netanyahu: Television Wins the Debate, Israel 1996. In Televised Election Debates, ► pp. 66 ff.

Bull, Peter

1994. On Identifying Questions, Replies, and Non-Replies in Political Interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 13:2 ► pp. 115 ff.

Bull, Peter

1998. Equivocation Theory and News Interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 17:1 ► pp. 36 ff.

Bull, Peter

2008. “Slipperiness, Evasion, and Ambiguity”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 27:4 ► pp. 333 ff.

Bull, Peter & Judy Elliott

1998. Level of Threat. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 17:2 ► pp. 220 ff.

Bull, Peter & Will Strawson

2019. Can’t Answer? Won’t Answer? An Analysis of Equivocal Responses by Theresa May in Prime Minister’s Questions. Parliamentary Affairs

Bull, Peter & Maurice Waddle

2019. “Let me now answer, very directly, Marie’s question”. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7:1 ► pp. 56 ff.

Clayman, Steven & John Heritage

2002. The News Interview,

Clayman, Steven E.

1988. Displaying Neutrality in Television News Interviews. Social Problems 35:4 ► pp. 474 ff.

Clayman, Steven E.

1990. From talk to text: newspaper accounts of reporter-source interactions. Media, Culture & Society 12:1 ► pp. 79 ff.

Clementson, David E.

2016. Why Do We Think Politicians Are So Evasive? Insight From Theories of Equivocation and Deception, With a Content Analysis of U.S. Presidential Debates, 1996-2012. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 35:3 ► pp. 247 ff.

Diaz, Maria Angela, Ken Lau & Chia-Yen Lin

2020. Pragmatic functions of I think in computer-mediated, cross-cultural communication between Taiwanese and Japanese undergraduate students. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:4 ► pp. 509 ff.

Dori-Hacohen, Gonen

2012. Types of Interaction on Israeli Political Radio Phone-In Programmes and Their Relations to the Public Sphere. Javnost - The Public 19:3 ► pp. 21 ff.

Ekström, Mats & Åsa Kroon Lundell

2011. BEYOND THE BROADCAST INTERVIEW. Journalism Studies 12:2 ► pp. 172 ff.

ELLIOTT, JUDY & PETER BULL

1996. A Question of Threat: Face Threats in Questions Posed During Televised Political Interviews. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 6:1 ► pp. 49 ff.

Evison, Jane

2013. A corpus linguistic analysis of turn-openings in spoken academic discourse: Understanding discursive specialisation. English Profile Journal 3

Feldman, Ofer

2022. Introduction: Political Interviews—An Analytical Model. In Adversarial Political Interviewing, ► pp. 1 ff.

Feldman, Ofer & Ken Kinoshita

2017. Do important questions demand respectful replies?. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 27:1 ► pp. 121 ff.

Feldman, Ofer & Ken Kinoshita

2017. Expanding factors in threat to face. Language and Dialogue 7:3 ► pp. 336 ff.

Feldman, Ofer & Ken Kinoshita

2019. Ignoring Respect: The Effects of Threat to Face on Replies and the Ensuing Questions During Broadcast Political Interviews in Japan. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 38:5-6 ► pp. 606 ff.

Feldman, Ofer, Ken Kinoshita & Peter Bull

2015. Culture or Communicative Conflict? The Analysis of Equivocation in Broadcast Japanese Political Interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 34:1 ► pp. 65 ff.

FELDMAN, OFER, KEN KINOSHITA & PETER BULL

2016. ‘Ducking and Diving’: How Political Issues Affect Equivocation in Japanese Political Interviews. Japanese Journal of Political Science 17:2 ► pp. 141 ff.

Feldman, Ofer, Ken Kinoshita & Peter Bull

2017. Failures in Leadership. Journal of Language and Politics 16:2 ► pp. 285 ff.

Fenton-Smith, Ben

2008. Discourse structure and political performance in adversarial parliamentary questioning. Journal of Language and Politics 7:1 ► pp. 97 ff.

Fetzer, Anita & Marjut Johansson

2007. ‘I’ll tell you what the truth is’. Journal of Language and Politics 6:2 ► pp. 147 ff.

Gastil, John

1992. Undemocratic Discourse: A Review of Theory and Research on Political Discourse. Discourse & Society 3:4 ► pp. 469 ff.

Gnisci, Augusto, Margherita Asterope, Rosa Casapulla, Maria D’Agostino & Gaetano Perillo

2022. Threat to Face and Equivocation in Televised Interviews of Italy’s Politicians For and Against the 2016 Constitutional Referendum. In Adversarial Political Interviewing, ► pp. 85 ff.

Gnisci, Augusto, Roger Bakeman & Vicenç Quera

2008. Blending qualitative and quantitative analyses in observing interaction: Misunderstandings, applications and proposals. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches 2:1 ► pp. 15 ff.

Gruber, Helmut

2022. Political language and textual vagueness. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 1 ff.

Hirsch, Galia

2022. Whose side are we on?. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 149 ff.

Holly, Werner

1993. Zur Inszenierung von Konfrontation in politischen Fernsehinterviews. In Inszenierte Information, ► pp. 164 ff.

Jaworski, Adam & Richard Fitzgerald

2008. 'This poll has not happened yet': temporal play in election predictions. Discourse & Communication 2:1 ► pp. 5 ff.

Jiang, Xiangying

2006. Cross-cultural pragmatic differences in US and Chinese press conferences: the case of the North Korea nuclear crisis. Discourse & Society 17:2 ► pp. 237 ff.

Johnson, Kirk A., John Sonnett, Mark K. Dolan, Randi Reppen & Laura Johnson

2010. Interjournalistic discourse about African Americans in television news coverage of Hurricane Katrina. Discourse & Communication 4:3 ► pp. 243 ff.

Jucker, Andreas H.

1996. Mass media. In Handbook of Pragmatics, ► pp. 1 ff.

Jucker, Andreas H.

2005. Mass media. In Handbook of Pragmatics, ► pp. 1 ff.

Kozhevnikova, Tat'yana Andreevna

2018. STRUCTURAL AND GENRE SPECIFICITY OF THE AMERICAN POLITICAL INTERVIEW: ARGUMENTATIVE AND RHETORICAL ASPECT. Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice :1-2 ► pp. 312 ff.

Kroon Lundell, Åsa & Mats Ekström

2013. INTERPRETING THE NEWS. Journalism Practice 7:4 ► pp. 517 ff.

Lempert, Michael

2009. On ‘flip-flopping’: Branded stance-taking in U.S. electoral politics1. Journal of Sociolinguistics 13:2 ► pp. 223 ff.

Levonian, Raluca-Mihaela

2017. What does ‘emergency’ mean?. Language and Dialogue 7:2 ► pp. 213 ff.

Lokajová, Jana

2021. ‘And we are Stuck in One Place, Minister.’ A Study of Evasiveness in Replies to Face-Threatening Questions in Slovak Political Interviews on Scandals (A Combined Approach). Journal of Linguistics/Jazykovedný casopis 72:2 ► pp. 690 ff.

Lundell, Åsa Kroon

2010. Dialogues between journalists on the news: the intraprofessional ‘interview’ as a communicative genre. Media, Culture & Society 32:3 ► pp. 429 ff.

Matus-Mendoza, Mariadelaluz

2006. Turn on, Tune in: Language of War in Iraq (Chile, Mexico, and Spain). In Leading to the 2003 Iraq War, ► pp. 249 ff.

McCarthy, Michael

2003. Talking Back: "Small" Interactional Response Tokens in Everyday Conversation. Research on Language & Social Interaction 36:1 ► pp. 33 ff.

Michaela, Mrázková

2019. Function of vagueness in politically oriented speeches. Journal of Linguistics/Jazykovedný casopis 70:1 ► pp. 95 ff.

Mininni, Giuseppe, Rosa Scardigno & Ignazio Grattagliano

2014. The dialogic construction of certainty in legal contexts. Language and Dialogue 4:1 ► pp. 112 ff.

Moke, Markus, Thorsten Quandt & Christoph Tapper

2000. Herr Bundeskanzler, was machen Sie, wenn Sie nicht mehr Kanzler sind…?. In Wahlkampf in den Medien — Wahlkampf mit den Medien, ► pp. 162 ff.

Murphy, James

2014. (Im)politeness during Prime Minister’s Questions in the U.K. Parliament. Pragmatics and Society 5:1 ► pp. 76 ff.

O’Connell, Daniel C. & Sabine Kowal

2006. The Research Status of Clayman and Heritage’s (2002) The News Interview. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 35:2 ► pp. 147 ff.

O’Connell, Daniel C. & Sabine Kowal

2022. Some current transcription systems for spoken discourse: A critical analysis. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 81 ff.

Pennock-Speck, Barry

2021. "So you're saying": the interrogation of Jordan Peterson. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 16:1 ► pp. 161 ff.

Politi, Panagiota

2009. One-sided laughter in academic presentations: a small-scale investigation. Discourse Studies 11:5 ► pp. 561 ff.

Sabet, Peyman G.P. & Grace Q. Zhang

2018. The Pragmatic Functions of ‘I Don't Think’ and ‘I Think + Not’. Australian Journal of Linguistics 38:3 ► pp. 421 ff.

Sadoun-Kerber, Keren

2021. Les avatars de l’autorité sur Twitter : l’exemple des usagers face à l’Allocution de Nouvel An du Président Macron. Argumentation et analyse du discours :26

Sarangi, Srikant

1997. Public discourse. In Handbook of Pragmatics, ► pp. 1 ff.

Schmidtke, Oliver

2016. Krisenbewältigung in Interaktionen als regelgeleitete Normabweichung. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 41:S1 ► pp. 133 ff.

Schmidtke, Oliver

2017. Krisenbewältigung in Interaktionen als regelgeleitete Normabweichung. In Handlungs- und Interaktionskrisen [Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 14], ► pp. 133 ff.

Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie

2000. The functions of I think in political discourse. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 10:1 ► pp. 41 ff.

Sissons, Helen

2015. Lifting the veil on the PRP–client relationship. Public Relations Inquiry 4:3 ► pp. 263 ff.

Sissons, Helen

2016. Negotiating the News. Journalism Studies 17:2 ► pp. 177 ff.

Stewart, Miranda M.

1995. Personally speaking … or not? The strategic value of on in face-to-face negotiation. Journal of French Language Studies 5:2 ► pp. 203 ff.

Swanepoel, L. M. & G. J. van Jaarsveld

1993. Wat is oorreding? 'n Pragmatiese perspektief. South African Journal of Linguistics 11:4 ► pp. 129 ff.

Tanaka, Lidia

2021. Japanese politicians’ questions in parliament. In Questioning and Answering Practices across Contexts and Cultures [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 323], ► pp. 71 ff.

Tanaka, Lidia

2022. Turn-taking in Japanese television interviews. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 361 ff.

Tanaka, Lidia

2022. Is formality relevant? Japanese tokens hai, ee and un . Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 191 ff.

Turner, Ken

1996. The principal principles of pragmatic inference: politeness. Language Teaching 29:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Vogt, Rüdiger

1998. „Wozu haben Sie mich eingeladen?“. In Verständigungsprobleme und gestörte Kommunikation, ► pp. 155 ff.

Waddle, Maurice & Peter Bull

2016. Playing the Man, Not the Ball. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 35:4 ► pp. 412 ff.

Waddle, Maurice & Peter Bull

2020. “You’re important, Jeremy, but not that important”: Personalised responses and equivocation in political interviews. Journal of Social and Political Psychology 8:2 ► pp. 560 ff.

Watkins, Megan

1997. The damnation of Demidenko—interview or inquisition? Towards a pragmatic interpretation of genre. Social Semiotics 7:1 ► pp. 53 ff.

Weizman, Elda

2022. Interviewing Styles: Reciprocal Positioning and Power in the Israeli Context. In Adversarial Political Interviewing, ► pp. 63 ff.

Yanoshevsky, Galia

2016. On the Literariness of the Author Interview. Poetics Today 37:1 ► pp. 181 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Main BIC Subject

Main BISAC Subject