Part of
Metonymy and Pragmatic InferencingEdited by Klaus-Uwe Panther and Linda L. Thornburg
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 113] 2003
► pp. 1–20
Edited by Klaus-Uwe Panther and Linda L. Thornburg
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 113] 2003
► pp. 1–20
Introduction
On the nature of conceptual metonymy
Cited by (28)
Cited by 28 other publications
Barcelona, Antonio
2024. Trends in cognitive-linguistic research on metonymy. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 11:1 ► pp. 51 ff. 
Norboboyevna, Gulchexra Tursunova
2024. Cognitive Semantic Features of Phraseological Units Denoting Human Intellectual Abilities in English and Uzbek Language. Pubmedia Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris 1:3 ► pp. 16 ff.
Littlemore, Jeannette
2023. ‘You’ll find Jane Austen in the basement’ … or Will You? Metonymy and Second Language Learning. In Applying Cognitive Linguistics to Second Language Learning and Teaching, ► pp. 143 ff.
Brdar, Mario & Rita Brdar-Szabó
2022. Targetting metonymic targets. In Figurative Thought and Language in Action [Figurative Thought and Language, 16], ► pp. 59 ff.
Vilar Lluch, Sara
2022. Redefining attitude for studying explicit and indirect evaluations of human behaviour. Functions of Language 29:2 ► pp. 199 ff.
Chang, Miao-Hsia & Ún-giân Iûnn
2021. A corpus-based study of directives in Taiwanese Southern Min. Concentric. Studies in Linguistics 47:2 ► pp. 300 ff.
Bierwiaczonek, Bogusław
2020. Figures of speech revisited. In Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language [Figurative Thought and Language, 9], ► pp. 225 ff.
Matusz, Łukasz
2020. I will see it done: Metonymic extensions of the verb see in English. Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies :31(4) ► pp. 88 ff.
Sólyom, Réka
2020. Neologisms in Hungarian terms of quality assurance. Taikomoji kalbotyra :14 ► pp. 72 ff.
Zibin, Aseel, Abdel Rahman Mitib Altakhaineh & Elham T. Hussein
2020. On the comprehension of metonymical expressions by Arabic-speaking EFL learners: A cognitive linguistic approach. Topics in Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 45 ff.
Denroche, Charles
2019. Employing cognitive metonymy theory in the analysis of semantic relations between source and target text in translation. Metaphor and the Social World 9:2 ► pp. 177 ff.
Ioannou, Georgios
2019. Metonymy and frame integration: Interfacing between concepts and discourse. Topics in Linguistics 20:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Komatsubara, Tetsuta
2019. Cognitive principles underlying predicational metonymy. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 6:2 ► pp. 247 ff.
Martin, Paul & Pam Papadelos
2017. Who stands for the norm? The place of metonymy in androcentric language. Social Semiotics 27:1 ► pp. 39 ff.
Catalano, Theresa, Jill Fox & Saloshna Vandeyar
2016. Being “in a Limbo”: Perceptions of Immigration, Identity and Adaptation of Immigrant Students in South Africa and the United States. Journal of Language, Identity & Education 15:3 ► pp. 137 ff.
Panther, Klaus-Uwe
2016. ‘Quo Vadimus?’ from a Cognitive Linguistic Perspective. Chinese Semiotic Studies 12:1 ► pp. 93 ff.
Li, Shuguang & Klaus-Uwe Panther
2014. ‘Author (date)’ constructions in academic discourse. English Text Construction 7:2 ► pp. 215 ff.
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg
2014. Metonymy and the way we speak. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 27:1 ► pp. 168 ff.
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg
2017. Chapter 1. Exploitingwh-questions for expressive purposes. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56], ► pp. 18 ff.
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg
2018. What kind of reasoning mode is metonymy?. In Conceptual metonymy [Human Cognitive Processing, 60], ► pp. 121 ff.
Catalano, Theresa & John W. Creswell
2013. Understanding the Language of the Occupy Movement. Qualitative Inquiry 19:9 ► pp. 664 ff.
Bagasheva, Alexandra
2012. The tastes and distastes of verbivores – some observations on X-phemisation in Bulgarian and English. Lexis :7
Haferland, Harald & Armin Schulz
2010. Metonymisches Erzählen. Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte 84:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Velasco-Sacristán, Marisol
2010. Metonymic grounding of ideological metaphors: Evidence from advertising gender metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics 42:1 ► pp. 64 ff.
Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog
2009. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis,
Kosecki, Krzysztof
2007. On Multiple Metonymies within Indirect Speech Acts . Research in Language 5 ► pp. 213 ff.
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Günter Radden
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.