Part of
Metonymy and Pragmatic InferencingEdited by Klaus-Uwe Panther and Linda L. Thornburg
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 113] 2003
► pp. 51–79
Edited by Klaus-Uwe Panther and Linda L. Thornburg
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 113] 2003
► pp. 51–79
Metonymy and conceptual blending
Cited by
Cited by 19 other publications
Barnden, John A.
2022. Metonymy, reflexive hyperbole and broadly reflexive relationships. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:1 ► pp. 33 ff. 
Booth, Michael
2017. Shakespeare’s Poetry. In Shakespeare and Conceptual Blending, ► pp. 115 ff.
Borgogni, Daniele
2017. Clipped Wings and the Great Abyss: Cognitive Stylistics and Implicatures in Abiezer Coppe’s ‘Prophetic’ Recantation. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 52:1 ► pp. 53 ff.
Borkent, Mike
2023. Comics and Cognition,
Brandt, Line
2014. Metaphor and the Communicative Mind. SSRN Electronic Journal
Brône, Geert & Seana Coulson
2010. Processing Deliberate Ambiguity in Newspaper Headlines: Double Grounding. Discourse Processes 47:3 ► pp. 212 ff.
Crisp, Peter
2012. The Pilgrim’s Progress: Allegory or novel?. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 21:4 ► pp. 328 ff.
Elliot, Esi A., Carmina Cavazos & Ai Ming Chow
2024. From racialized brands to authentic brands: Dynamic conceptual blending. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science 34:1 ► pp. 19 ff.
Fougner Rydning, Atin
2005. The Return of Sense on the Scene of Translation Studies in the Light of the Cognitive Blending Theory. Meta 50:2 ► pp. 392 ff.
Golubeva, Tatiana
2023. The proper names ‘Assad’, ‘ISIL’, ‘ISIS’, ‘Daesh’ and ‘European’ as metonymic blends in political
discourse. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 21:1 ► pp. 115 ff.
Kövecses, Zoltán
2020. Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory,
Messerschmidt, Johanna & Luna Bergh
2011. Met kerse opmet-konstruksies: 'n Verwysingspuntperspektief. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 29:1 ► pp. 97 ff.
Molina Plaza, Silvia
2015. Black and White Metaphors and Metonymies in English and Spanish: A Cross-Cultural and Corpus Comparison. In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2015 [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, 3], ► pp. 39 ff.
Moore, Kevin Ezra
Novichkova, Lidiya Nikolaevna
2019. BLENDING THEORY AS A TECHNIQUE TO DECODE AUTHORIAL MEANING (BY THE MATERIAL OF F. M. DOSTOEVSKY’S PERSONAL LETTER). Philology. Theory & Practice 12:9 ► pp. 324 ff.
Radden, Günter
2018. Chapter 6. Molly married money. In Conceptual Metonymy [Human Cognitive Processing, 60], ► pp. 161 ff.
Riad, Sally
2019. The role of visual metonymy in leadership symbolism: Mapping its dynamics through the Sphinx. Leadership 15:4 ► pp. 480 ff.
Rocci, Andrea, Sabrina Mazzali-Lurati & Chiara Pollaroli
2018. The argumentative and rhetorical function of multimodal metonymy. Semiotica 2018:220 ► pp. 123 ff.
Smith, Thomas H.
2020. Chapter 7. Three metaphors in social science. In How Metaphors Guide, Teach and Popularize Science [Figurative Thought and Language, 6], ► pp. 211 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.