2019. BLENDING THEORY AS A TECHNIQUE TO DECODE AUTHORIAL MEANING (BY THE MATERIAL OF F. M. DOSTOEVSKY’S PERSONAL LETTER). Philology. Theory & Practice 12:9 ► pp. 324 ff.
Riad, Sally
2019. The role of visual metonymy in leadership symbolism: Mapping its dynamics through the Sphinx. Leadership 15:4 ► pp. 480 ff.
2018. The argumentative and rhetorical function of multimodal metonymy. Semiotica 2018:220 ► pp. 123 ff.
Booth, Michael
2017. Shakespeare’s Poetry. In Shakespeare and Conceptual Blending, ► pp. 115 ff.
Borgogni, Daniele
2017. Clipped Wings and the Great Abyss: Cognitive Stylistics and Implicatures in Abiezer Coppe’s ‘Prophetic’ Recantation. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 52:1 ► pp. 53 ff.
Molina Plaza, Silvia
2015. Black and White Metaphors and Metonymies in English and Spanish: A Cross-Cultural and Corpus Comparison. In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2015 [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, 3], ► pp. 39 ff.
Brandt, Line
2014. Metaphor and the Communicative Mind. SSRN Electronic Journal
Crisp, Peter
2012. The Pilgrim’s Progress: Allegory or novel?. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 21:4 ► pp. 328 ff.
Messerschmidt, Johanna & Luna Bergh
2011. Met kerse opmet-konstruksies: 'n Verwysingspuntperspektief. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 29:1 ► pp. 97 ff.
Brône, Geert & Seana Coulson
2010. Processing Deliberate Ambiguity in Newspaper Headlines: Double Grounding. Discourse Processes 47:3 ► pp. 212 ff.
Fougner Rydning, Atin
2005. The Return of Sense on the Scene of Translation Studies in the Light of the Cognitive Blending Theory. Meta 50:2 ► pp. 392 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.