Part of
Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing
Edited by Klaus-Uwe Panther and Linda L. Thornburg
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 113] 2003
► pp. 105126
Cited by

Cited by 24 other publications

Ackermann, Tanja
2023. Mitigating strategies and politeness in German requests. Journal of Politeness Research 19:2  pp. 355 ff. DOI logo
Baicchi, Annalisa
2015. Conceptual metaphor in the complex dynamics of illocutionary meaning. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:1  pp. 106 ff. DOI logo
Brdar-Szabó, Rita & Mario Brdar
2009. Indirect directives in recipes: a cross-linguistic perspective. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 5:1 DOI logo
Cameron-Faulkner, Thea
2014. The development of speech acts. In Pragmatic Development in First Language Acquisition [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 10],  pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Cappelle, Bert
2017. What’s Pragmatics Doing Outside Constructions?. In Semantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line [Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, 11],  pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Cappelle, Bert & Ilse Depraetere
2016. Modal meaning in Construction Grammar. Constructions and Frames 8:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Cappelle, Bert, Ilse Depraetere & Mégane Lesuisse
2019. The necessity modals have to, must, need to, and should . Constructions and Frames 11:2  pp. 220 ff. DOI logo
Guryev, Alexander & François Delafontaine
Iza Erviti, Aneider
2017. An exploratory study of complementary contrastive discourse constructions in English. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 30:1  pp. 210 ff. DOI logo
KONNO, HIROAKI
2004. THE IF YOU BE CONSTRUCTION AS A SPEECH ACT CONSTRUCTION. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 21:1  pp. 34 ff. DOI logo
Kosecki, Krzysztof
2007. On Multiple Metonymies within Indirect Speech Acts . Research in Language 5  pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Kuo, Yueh Hsin
2021. Morphosyntactic vagueness and directionality. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 9:1  pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Kuo, Yueh Hsin
Lang, Jun
2018. “I am not criticizing you”. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 9:2  pp. 184 ff. DOI logo
Liedtke, Frank
2017. Constructions, Templates and Pragmatics: Response to Cappelle. In Semantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line [Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, 11],  pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Meibauer, Jörg
2019. What is an indirect speech act?. Pragmatics & Cognition 26:1  pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
Nikiforidou, Kiki
2022. Constructional analysis. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ],  pp. 310 ff. DOI logo
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg
Ruytenbeek, Nicolas
2017. The Comprehension of Indirect Requests: Previous Work and Future Directions. In Semantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line [Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, 11],  pp. 293 ff. DOI logo
Trott, Sean & Benjamin Bergen
2019. Individual Differences in Mentalizing Capacity Predict Indirect Request Comprehension. Discourse Processes 56:8  pp. 675 ff. DOI logo
Trott, Sean & Federico Rossano
2020. The Role of Entitlement in Formatting Preferences Across Requesters and Recipients. Discourse Processes 57:7  pp. 551 ff. DOI logo
Vassilaki, Evgenia
2017. Chapter 4. Cognitive motivation in the linguistic realization of requests in Modern Greek. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56],  pp. 106 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.