Part of
Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing
Edited by Klaus-Uwe Panther and Linda L. Thornburg
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 113] 2003
► pp. 105126
Cited by

Cited by 26 other publications

Ackermann, Tanja
2023. Mitigating strategies and politeness in German requests. Journal of Politeness Research 19:2  pp. 355 ff. DOI logo
Baicchi, Annalisa
2015. Conceptual metaphor in the complex dynamics of illocutionary meaning. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:1  pp. 106 ff. DOI logo
Brdar-Szabó, Rita & Mario Brdar
2009. Indirect directives in recipes: a cross-linguistic perspective. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 5:1 DOI logo
Cameron-Faulkner, Thea
2014. The development of speech acts. In Pragmatic Development in First Language Acquisition [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 10],  pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Cappelle, Bert
2017. What’s Pragmatics Doing Outside Constructions?. In Semantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line [Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, 11],  pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Cappelle, Bert & Ilse Depraetere
2016. Modal meaning in Construction Grammar. Constructions and Frames 8:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Cappelle, Bert, Ilse Depraetere & Mégane Lesuisse
2019. The necessity modals have to, must, need to, and should . Constructions and Frames 11:2  pp. 220 ff. DOI logo
Guryev, Alexander & François Delafontaine
Iza Erviti, Aneider
2017. An exploratory study of complementary contrastive discourse constructions in English. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 30:1  pp. 210 ff. DOI logo
KONNO, HIROAKI
2004. THE IF YOU BE CONSTRUCTION AS A SPEECH ACT CONSTRUCTION. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 21:1  pp. 34 ff. DOI logo
Kosecki, Krzysztof
2007. On Multiple Metonymies within Indirect Speech Acts . Research in Language 5  pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Kuo, Yueh Hsin
2021. Morphosyntactic vagueness and directionality. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 9:1  pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Kuo, Yueh Hsin
Lang, Jun
2018. “I am not criticizing you”. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 9:2  pp. 184 ff. DOI logo
Liedtke, Frank
2017. Constructions, Templates and Pragmatics: Response to Cappelle. In Semantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line [Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, 11],  pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Meibauer, Jörg
2019. What is an indirect speech act?. Pragmatics & Cognition 26:1  pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
Mompean, Jose A. & Javier Valenzuela Manzanares
2019. Brexit means Brexit: a constructionist analysis. Complutense Journal of English Studies 27  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Nikiforidou, Kiki
2022. Constructional analysis. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ],  pp. 310 ff. DOI logo
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg
Ruytenbeek, Nicolas
2017. The Comprehension of Indirect Requests: Previous Work and Future Directions. In Semantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line [Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, 11],  pp. 293 ff. DOI logo
Trott, Sean & Benjamin Bergen
2019. Individual Differences in Mentalizing Capacity Predict Indirect Request Comprehension. Discourse Processes 56:8  pp. 675 ff. DOI logo
Trott, Sean & Federico Rossano
2020. The Role of Entitlement in Formatting Preferences Across Requesters and Recipients. Discourse Processes 57:7  pp. 551 ff. DOI logo
Trotzke, Andreas
2023. Non-Canonical Questions, DOI logo
Vassilaki, Evgenia
2017. Chapter 4. Cognitive motivation in the linguistic realization of requests in Modern Greek. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56],  pp. 106 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.