Metonymic coding of linguistic action in English, Croatian and Hungarian

Cited by 9 other publications

Athanasiadou, Angeliki

2017. Chapter 6. If-clauses and their figurative basis. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56], ► pp. 152 ff.

Athanasiadou, Angeliki

2017. Chapter 9. Irony has a metonymic basis. In Irony in Language Use and Communication [Figurative Thought and Language, 1], ► pp. 201 ff.

Brdar-Szabó, Rita & Mario Brdar

2009. Indirect directives in recipes: a cross-linguistic perspective. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 5:1

Brdar-Szabó, Rita & Mario Brdar

2021. Metonymic indeterminacy and metalepsis. In Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11], ► pp. 175 ff.

Herrero-Ruiz, Javier

2020. On Some Pragmatic Effects of Event Metonymies. Metaphor and Symbol 35:4 ► pp. 266 ff.

Littlemore, Jeannette, Satomi Arizono & Alice May

2016. The interpretation of metonymy by Japanese learners of English. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:1 ► pp. 51 ff.

Muñoz, Carmen Portero

2022. Forty years of metonymy. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:1 ► pp. 172 ff.

Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Günter Radden

2005. Metonymy. In Handbook of Pragmatics, ► pp. 1 ff.

Zhang, Weiwei, Dirk Speelman & Dirk Geeraerts

2015. Cross-linguistic variation in metonymies for PERSON. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:1 ► pp. 220 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.