Part of
Persuasion Across Genres: A linguistic approachEdited by Helena Halmari and Tuija Virtanen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 130] 2005
► pp. 59–101
Edited by Helena Halmari and Tuija Virtanen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 130] 2005
► pp. 59–101
Persuasion in judicial argumentation
The Opinions of the Advocates General at the European Court of Justice
Cited by
Cited by 8 other publications
Fki, Najla
2022. The law review paper between the Kingdom of the law and the realms of academia: A systemic functional analysis of adverbial clauses. Discourse and Interaction 15:1 ► pp. 5 ff. 
Jopek-Bosiacka, Anna
Koźbiał, Dariusz
2020. Epistemic Modality: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Epistemic Markers in EU and Polish Judgments. Comparative Legilinguistics 41:1 ► pp. 39 ff.
Koźbiał, Dariusz
2021. Wykładniki modalności w wyrokach Trybunału Sprawiedliwości UE i Sądu Najwyższego RP – analiza korpusowa. Studia Iuridica :83 ► pp. 78 ff.
Maier, Carmen Daniela
2012. Mediating argumentative deconstruction of advertising discourses: a new means of multimodal learning. Learning, Media and Technology 37:2 ► pp. 163 ff.
Migdadi, Fathi, Muhammad A. Badarneh & Laila Khwaylih
2021. Jordanian graduate students’ complaints on Facebook: Semantic formulas and politeness. Lebende Sprachen 66:1 ► pp. 144 ff.
Szczyrbak, Magdalena
2017. Modal adverbs of certainty in the rhetoric of Advocates General: a dialogic view. Topics in Linguistics 18:1 ► pp. 48 ff.
Szczyrbak, Magdalena
2017. Modal Adverbs of Certainty in EU Legal Discourse: A Parallel Corpus Approach. In Contrastive Analysis of Discourse-pragmatic Aspects of Linguistic Genres [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, 5], ► pp. 91 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.