Japanese Discourse Markers
Synchronic and diachronic discourse analysis
| Aoyama Gakuin University
This book is one of the pioneering historical pragmatic studies of Japanese. It closely illustrates the usage and contributions of some Japanese discourse markers, and reveals their developmental history. The section on Synchronic Analysis explores the previously uninvestigated functions of some discourse markers used in Present Day Japanese. Moment by moment in on-going conversations, where culturally rigidly-defined interactional norms are highly valued, a specific marker is chosen and used by the speakers as their strategy, based on their quite subjective judgment. The section on Diachronic Analysis then demonstrates chronologically how the meanings and forms of the same markers have come into being. Results include some noticeable changes related to the strengthened intersubjectivity. This multi-dimensional study also discusses the relevance of findings to typological characteristics and productivity. Consideration is further given to why certain expressions (rather than others) become discourse markers and independent forms in Japanese.
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 132] 2004. xiv, 253 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
Acknowledgments
|
|
|
Transcription conventions
|
|
|
1. Introduction
|
1–29
|
|
2. Perspectives on Pragmatics of Japanese Discourse Markers: Synchronic and diachronic discourse analysis
|
31–56
|
|
3. Functions of the Conjunctions d emo and dakedo in Present Day Japanese (synchronic analysis)
|
57–84
|
|
4. Pragmaticalization of demo and dakedo (diachronic analysis)
|
85–121
|
|
5. Functions of Interjections ne and na in Present Day Japanese (synchronic analysis)
|
123–155
|
|
6. Pragmaticalization of ne and na (diachronic analysis)
|
157–195
|
|
7. Conclusion
|
197–218
|
|
Notes
|
219–226
|
|
References
|
227–240
|
|
Name Index
|
241–243
|
|
Subject Index
|
245–251
|
“Onodera’s study opens up the new field of historical pragmatics, superbly combining the methodology of recently developed discourse analysis and the fruitage of the traditional historical study of Japanese. The method and results shown in this book set up important guidelines for future studies in theoretical linguistics and traditional historical linguistics, because this book demonstrates to the former which historical data should be examined in what way, and it also informs the latter that conjunctions and interjections are not marginal, but instead constitute a fertile area of study.
”
”
Satoshi Kinsui, Osaka University
“Building on Schiffrin's groundbreaking study of discourse markers, Onodera significantly advances our cross-linguistic understanding of adversative connectives and interjections. Her synchronic and diachronic analyses of four Japanese discourse markers confirm the broad-scale validity of earlier claims concerning differences between conjunctions and discourse markers on the one hand, and the emergence over time of discourse-based, subjective meanings on the other. The theoretical refinements she proposes, based on typological and speech-style differences between English and Japanese, enhance the field of historical pragmatics in important ways.”
Elizabeth Closs Traugott, Stanford University
“Onodera's study of the development of Japanese discourse markers breaks new ground in the study of discourse and pragmatic markers. By combining different perspectives and methodologies to chart changes in a variety of forms, she provides a clear model that should be emulated by others interested in grammar and discourse not only from a diachronic perspective, but also from a synchronic perspective.”
Deborah Schiffrin, Georgetown University
“[...] this volume makes an important contribution to not only advancing our understanding of such common expressions as 'demo' and 'ne' used in daily conversations but also shedding new light on the general process of pragmaticalization by bringing in Japanese data.”
Sufumi So, George Mason University, on Linguist List, Vol. 16.2263 (2005)
Cited by
Cited by other publications
No author info given
2014. Managing academic institutional discourse in English as a lingua franca.
Functions of Language 21:1 ► pp. 50 ff. 
No author info given
2017.
In Involvement and Attitude in Japanese Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 272],
Brinton, Laurel J.
2015.
In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis,
► pp. 222 ff.
D'Hondt, Ulrique
2014.
Au fait, de fait et en fait
.
Revue Romane 49:2 ► pp. 235 ff.
Ghezzi, Chiara & Piera Molinelli
2016. Politeness markers from Latin to Italian.
Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17:2 ► pp. 307 ff.
Higashiizumi, Yuko
2015.
In New Directions in Grammaticalization Research [Studies in Language Companion Series, 166],
► pp. 135 ff.
Higashiizumi, Yuko
2016. The development of confirmation/agreement markers away from the RP in Japanese.
Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17:2 ► pp. 282 ff.
Hofmockel, Carolin
2017. Patterns of (inter)subjectivity.
Functions of Language 24:2 ► pp. 166 ff.
Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita & Katsunobu Izutsu
2019. Why is Twitter so popular in Japan?.
Internet Pragmatics 2:2 ► pp. 260 ff.
Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita & Katsunobu Izutsu
2020.
In Information-Structural Perspectives on Discourse Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 213],
► pp. 136 ff.
Jucker, Andreas H.
2006.
In Handbook of Pragmatics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Maschler, Yael & Deborah Schiffrin
2015.
In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis,
► pp. 189 ff.
Meng, Hai-Rong & Takeshi Nakamoto
2018. Discourse particles in Chinese–Japanese code switching: Constrained by the Matrix Language Frame?.
International Journal of Bilingualism 22:1 ► pp. 100 ff.
Modicom, Pierre-Yves & Olivier Duplâtre
2020.
In Information-Structural Perspectives on Discourse Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 213],
► pp. 2 ff.
Moriya, Tetsuharu & Kaoru Horie
2009.
In Japanese Modality,
► pp. 87 ff.
NARROG, HEIKO
2006. A Renaissance for Historical Semantics (E. C. Traugott and R. B. Dasher, Regularity in Semantic Change).
ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 23:2 ► pp. 554 ff.
Nejadansari, Dariush & Ali Mohamad Mohammadi
2014. The frequencies and functions of discourse markers in the Iranian university EFL classroom discourse.
International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning 4:2
Onodera, Noriko O. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2016. Periphery.
Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17:2 ► pp. 163 ff.
Shibasaki, Reijirou
2018.
In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 202],
► pp. 333 ff.
Shimada, Yutaka, Mayumi Tatara, Kantaro Fujiwara & Tohru Ikeguchi
2019. Formation mechanisms of local structures in language networks.
EPL (Europhysics Letters) 127:5 ► pp. 56003 ff.
Shinzato, Rumiko
2014.
In Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 243],
► pp. 77 ff.
Shinzato, Rumiko
2014.
In Usage-based Approaches to Japanese Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 156],
► pp. 85 ff.
Shinzato, Rumiko
2017.
In Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 186],
► pp. 305 ff.
Sohn, Sung-Ock S.
2016. Development of the discourse marker kulentey (‘but, by the way’) in Korean.
Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17:2 ► pp. 231 ff.
Tamaji, Mizuho
2017. Development of ‘say’-derived constructions.
Language and Linguistics 18:2 ► pp. 296 ff.
Tanaka, Lidia
2010. Is formality relevant? Japanese tokens hai, ee and un
.
Pragmatics 20:2 ► pp. 191 ff.
Tanno, Koji
2018. The role of discourse strategies in the grammaticalization of the Japanese discourse marker dakara.
Language and Linguistics 19:4 ► pp. 592 ff.
Wong, Angelia & Ruanni Tupas
2019. Durable and changing views of English: a diachronic thematic analysis of National Day Rally speeches in Singapore.
Asian Englishes 21:3 ► pp. 224 ff.
Yasunari, Asuka
2018. The Role of Questions in Managing Affect and Emotional Involvement in Japanese Conversations.
Journal of Universal Language 19:2 ► pp. 1 ff.
Zawiszová, Halina
2018.
In On ´doing friendship´ in and through talk: Exploring conversational interactions of Japanese young people,
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 june 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
BIC Subject: CF – Linguistics
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number: 2004059887