Article published in:Opening Windows on Texts and Discourses of the Past
Edited by Janne Skaffari, Matti Peikola, Ruth Carroll, Risto Hiltunen and Brita Wårvik
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 134] 2005
► pp. 83–94
Patterns of agentivity and narrativity in early science discourse
Between the 15th century and today there have been significant changes in the organisation of scientific discourse, previously identified as developments towards more literate styles (Biber & Finegan 1997) or less narrativity (Atkinson 1992, 1996). This paper argues that such changes affect the linguistic expression of agentivity, in particular. Corpus-based evidence for Early Modern and Modern English shows that early science texts moved from narratives in non-primary use (serving a non-narrative function) to a more function-based, argumentative text pattern. While, originally, both narrative and argument in science were based on personal reference and preserved agentivity, modern scientific discourse nominalises the experience and impersonalises the argument. This explains why the language of science has generally been characterised as static and impersonal.
Published online: 24 March 2005
Cited by 3 other publications
Whitt, Richard J.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 june 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.