Talk and Practical Epistemology

The social life of knowledge in a Caribbean community

| University of Toronto
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027253859 | EUR 115.00 | USD 173.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027294098 | EUR 115.00 | USD 173.00
 
Drawing on the methods of conversation analysis and ethnography, this book sets out to examine the epistemological practices of Indo-Guyanese villagers as these are revealed in their talk and daily conduct. Based on over eighty-five hours of conversation recorded during twelve months of ethnographic fieldwork, the book describes both the social distribution of knowledge and the villagers' methods for distinguishing between fact and fancy, knowledge and belief through close analyses of particular encounters. The various chapters consider uncertainty and expertise in advice-giving, the cultivation of ignorance in an attempt to avoid scandal, and the organization of peer groups through the display of knowledge in the activity of reminiscing local history. An orienting chapter on questions and an appendix provide an introduction to conversation analysis. The book makes a contribution to linguistic anthropology, conversation analysis and cross-cultural pragmatics. The conclusion discusses the implications of the analysis for current understanding of practice, knowledge and social organization in anthropology and neighboring disciplines.
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 142]  2005.  xvi, 255 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements
vii–ix
What is a transcript?
xi–xv
1. Malinowski’s complaint
1–18
2. Knowledge and talk-in-interaction
19–51
3. The village
53–74
4. The vernacular
75–82
5. Answering questions: A genealogy
83–106
6. Uncertainty and expertise in advice
107–129
7. Cultivated ignorance
131–150
8. Reminiscing local history
151–170
9. Policing knowledge
171–186
10. Conclusion: Knowledge, belief and action
187–206
Appendix
Conversation analysis: A glossary and guide to the literature
207–221
Notes
223–238
References
239–251
Index
253–255
“This book demonstrates conclusively and richly the importance of studying language in particular situations in order to understand the production of meaning. It makes conversation analysis central to any account of practice, and I find this a very bold but well-supported view. An adequate account of human practice is an important goal and one that language scholars and scholars of pragmatics have a lot to contribute to. It's very well written and very erudite. This is an excellent book, which will be of great interest to many anthropologists, linguists, sociologists, communication and language scholars, as well as students of language use.”
“There is much impressive and to be appreciated about this book. Three of its strengths strike this reviewer as especially noteworthy. First, by the last chapter Sidnell has clearly accomplished each of the objectives he set out to achieve. Perhaps most striking among these is the author's utilization of CA and his keen ability to link the insights it offers to topics which are not typically discussed by its practitoiners. Second, the volume includes a generous amount of empirical data: substantial excerpts of spoken discourse and ethnographic information. These come together in a relatively seamless manner, consistently reminding the reader that talk is embedded in and intertwined with its own epistemologies of practice. Third, the book successfully straddles various analytical perspectives. This study establishes its topic by tracking traditional inquiries. It can be said to link, and also to frequently transcend, established perspectives in the study of conversation, narrative, language and gender, sociohistory, identity and performance.”
“The data Sidnell presents, which come from Sidnell's extensive fieldwork in a Guyanese village, are rich and vivid, and Sidnell's analyses of the interaction are elegant and illuminating. In fact, it is worth reading the book just for these analyses.”
“An excellent book that makes a real contribution to a range of fields (linguistic anthropology, ethnography, conversation analysis, the sociology of knowledge, etc.). Among the book's real strengths is its integration of detailed analysis of language structure and the organization of talk with crucial issues in philosophy and ethnography. The detailed analysis is both insightful and substantive, and moreover the issues it raises and demonstrates about the organization of knowledge as practice are very important and original. This is an important, very original book that makes genuine substantive contributions and opens up important topics for discussion in a range of fields.”
Cited by

Cited by other publications

No author info given
2012.  In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis,  pp. 741 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2015.  In Uncertain Futures,  pp. 197 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2017.  In Conversational structures of Alto Perené (Arawak) of Peru [Studies in Language Companion Series, 181], Crossref logo
Bucholtz, Mary & Kira Hall
2008. All of the above: New coalitions in sociocultural linguistics1. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12:4  pp. 401 ff. Crossref logo
Dingemanse, Mark, Francisco Torreira, N. J. Enfield & Johan J. Bolhuis
2013. Is “Huh?” a Universal Word? Conversational Infrastructure and the Convergent Evolution of Linguistic Items. PLoS ONE 8:11  pp. e78273 ff. Crossref logo
Hayashi, Makoto
2012. Claiming Uncertainty in Recollection: A Study ofKke-Marked Utterances in Japanese Conversation. Discourse Processes 49:5  pp. 391 ff. Crossref logo
KOCKELMAN, Paul
2013. The anthropology of an equation. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3:3  pp. 33 ff. Crossref logo
Kockelman, Paul
2019. Being multiversed in the multiverse. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 9:1  pp. 200 ff. Crossref logo
LEMPERT, MICHAEL
2008. The poetics of stance: Text-metricality, epistemicity, interaction. Language in Society 37:4  pp. 569 ff. Crossref logo
MAHEUX-PELLETIER, GENEVIÈVE & ANDREA GOLATO
2008. Repair in membership categorization in French. Language in Society 37:5  pp. 689 ff. Crossref logo
Mihas, Elena
2016. Language-specific resources in talk: A study of epistemic stance coding in Alto Perené (Arawak) agreements. Discourse Studies 18:2  pp. 165 ff. Crossref logo
Muntigl, Peter & Kwok Tim Choi
2010. Not remembering as a practical epistemic resource in couples therapy. Discourse Studies 12:3  pp. 331 ff. Crossref logo
Raymond, Geoffrey
2018. Which epistemics? Whose conversation analysis?. Discourse Studies 20:1  pp. 57 ff. Crossref logo
Razfar, Aria
2005. Language ideologies in practice: Repair and classroom discourse. Linguistics and Education 16:4  pp. 404 ff. Crossref logo
Rusk, Fredrik, Michaela Pörn & Fritjof Sahlström
2016.  In Open Spaces for Interactions and Learning Diversities,  pp. 151 ff. Crossref logo
San Roque, Lila
2019. Evidentiality. Annual Review of Anthropology 48:1  pp. 353 ff. Crossref logo
Schützeichel, Rainer
2018.  In Handbuch Professionssoziologie,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Sidnell, Jack
2008. Alternate and complementary perspectives on language and social life: The organization of repair in two Caribbean communities1. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12:4  pp. 477 ff. Crossref logo
Sidnell, Jack
2012. Language and gender in the Caribbean. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 27:1  pp. 141 ff. Crossref logo
Sidnell, Jack & N. J. Enfield
2012. Language Diversity and Social Action. Current Anthropology 53:3  pp. 302 ff. Crossref logo
Strahan, Tania & Lesley Stirling
2016. “What the hell was in that wine?”. Narrative Inquiry 26:2  pp. 430 ff. Crossref logo
Unknown / not yet matched
2020. Meaning construction in interactive academic talk. Pragmatics & Cognition 26:2-3 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 06 november 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects

Philosophy

Philosophy
BIC Subject: HP – Philosophy
BISAC Subject: PHI000000 – PHILOSOPHY / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2005050766 | Marc record