The information structure of it-clefts, wh-clefts and reverse wh-clefts in English

Cited by other publications

BRANDTLER, JOHAN

2019. The question of form in the forming of questions: The meaning and use of clefted wh-interrogatives in Swedish. Journal of Linguistics 55:4 ► pp. 755 ff.

De Cesare, Anna-Maria & Davide Garassino

2015. On the status of exhaustiveness in cleft sentences: An empirical and cross-linguistic study of English also-/only-clefts and Italian anche-/solo-clefts. Folia Linguistica 49:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Gärtner, Hans-Martin

2009. On the prospects of a clause combining approach to “focusing” no-constructions in Malagasy. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 27:4 ► pp. 789 ff.

KARSSENBERG, LENA

2017. Frenchil y aclefts, existential sentences and the Focus-Marking Hypothesis. Journal of French Language Studies 27:3 ► pp. 405 ff.

Karssenberg, Lena, Karen Lahousse, Béatrice Lamiroy, Stefania Marzo & Ana Drobnjakovic

2018. Non-prototypical clefts. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 32 ► pp. 1 ff.

Kroeger, Paul

2009. Malagasy clefts from a Western Malayo-Polynesian perspective: Commentary on the paper by Hans-Martin Gärtner. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 27:4 ► pp. 817 ff.

Yao, Xinyue

2016. Cleft constructions in Hong Kong English. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 37:2 ► pp. 197 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.