Thou and You in Early Modern English Dialogues
Trials, Depositions, and Drama Comedy
| Uppsala University
This book is a corpus-based study examining thou and you in three speech-related genres from 1560–1760, a crucial period in the history of second person singular pronouns, spanning the time from when you became dominant to when thou became all but obsolete. The study embraces the fields of corpus linguistics, historical pragmatics, and historical sociolinguistics. Using data drawn from the recently released A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760 and manuscript material, the aim is to ascertain which extra-linguistic and linguistic factors highlighted by previous research appear particularly relevant in the selection and relative distribution of thou and you. Previous research on thou and you has tended to concentrate on Drama and/or been primarily qualitative in nature. Depositions in particular have hitherto received very little attention. This book is intended to help fill a gap in the literature by presenting an in-depth qualitative and quantitative analysis of pronoun usage in Trials, Depositions, and, for comparative purposes, Drama Comedy.
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 158] 2007. xx, 339 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Preface and acknowledgements | p. xiii
-
List of tables, figures, and maps | pp. xv–xx
-
1. Introduction | p. 1
-
1.1 Aims and scope
-
1.2 Methodological framework
-
1.3 Presentation of corpus examples
-
1.4 Outline of the study
-
2. Corpus and genre overview | p. 9
-
2.1 Introduction
-
2.2 A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760 (CED)
-
2.3 The corpus used for the present study
-
2.4 The genres investigated
-
2.5 Summary
-
3. Data classification | p. 21
-
3.1 Introduction
-
3.2 The classification system for the parameters of sex, age, and rank
-
3.3 Summary
-
4. Previous research on thou and you in Early Modern English | p. 39
-
4.1 Introduction and historical background
-
4.2 Theoretical approaches to the study of pronoun usage
-
4.3 Genre studies of pronoun usage
-
4.4 Thou and you in contemporaneous grammars
-
4.5 The development of address systems in Early Modern European languages
-
4.6 Summary
-
5. Thou and you in Trials 1560–1760 | p. 65
-
5.1 Introduction
-
5.2 The Trials sub-corpus
-
5.3 The macro-analysis
-
5.4 The micro-analysis: Pronoun usage in the Trials sub-corpus
-
5.5 Summary
-
6. Thou and you in Depositions 1560–1760 | p. 93
-
6.1 Introduction
-
6.2 The Depositions sub-corpus
-
6.3 The macro-analysis
-
6.4 The micro-analysis: Pronoun usage in the Depositions sub-corpus
-
7. Thou and you in Drama Comedy 1560–1760 | p. 171
-
7.1 Introduction
-
7.2 The Drama Comedy sub-corpus
-
7.3 The macro-analysis
-
7.4 The micro-analysis: Pronoun usage in the Drama Comedy sub-corpus
-
8. The role of selected linguistic factors in thou and you usage | p. 237
-
8.1 Introduction
-
8.2 Is there evidence of grammatical conditioning of thou and you usage?
-
8.3 Pronoun forms and their syntactic function
-
9. Summary and conclusions | p. 287
-
9.1 Overview of the aims and hypotheses
-
9.2 Summary of findings for the three genres
-
9.3 Factors influencing pronoun usage
-
9.4 Were the hypotheses confirmed?
-
9.5 Suggestions for further research
-
Appendix | p. 297
-
-
Index | p. 337
“Terry Walker's 'Thou and You in Early Modern English Dialogues' (2007) is an impressive in-depth study on pronoun in early English trials, depositions and comedies. Mainly drawing material from A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560-1760 (CED) [...] the book is a welcome addition to the extensive continuum of historical linguistic studies concentrating on the use of thou and you. Walker's book is a meticulous and comprehensive study. Its major strength lies in the way in which quantitative analysis is combined with, and supported by, qualitative examination of the context. With ample use of examples drawn from the data, the writer is able to illustrate the extent of variation in the use of second-person singular pronouns within the period when thou was gradually becoming obsolete. Her findings both corroborate those gained from earlier studies on the macro-level factors determining thou and you usage and shed new light on the contextual variation of the two pronouns. The study also proves how important and advantageous it is to be able to make use of well-compiled language corpora for studies in historical linguistics, in general, and in sociopragmatics, in particular.”
Minna Nevala, University of Helsinki, in the Journal of Historical Pragmatics, Vol. 11:2 (2010)
“Walker's book, an in particular her investigation of the Depositions material, represents an important corrective addition to existing scholarship in the field, which has tended to concentrate on dramatic works, and those of Shakespeare in particular. An impressive amount of detailed information is processed, but the reader is guided through the presentation by purposeful organisation of the material into subsections, by frequent summaries and helpful graphs and charts supplementing the tables, and by great clarity of style throughout.”
Kari E. Haugland, University of Bergen, in English Studies Vol. 90, No. 4 (2009)
Cited by
Cited by 21 other publications
No author info given
2018.
In Patterns of Change in 18th-century English [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 8],
No author info given
2021.
In Nominal and Pronominal Address in Jamaica and Trinidad [Topics in Address Research, 3],
Anglemark, Linnéa
2018. “Heav’n bess you, my Dear”.
Journal of Historical Pragmatics 19:2 ► pp. 186 ff.
Brinton, Laurel J.
2015.
In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis,
► pp. 222 ff.
Conde-Silvestre, J. Camilo
2016.
In Handbook of Pragmatics,
Foster, Daniel, Suzanne Aalberse & Wessel Stoop
2019.
In It’s not all about you
[Topics in Address Research, 1],
► pp. 76 ff.
Haeberli, Eric & Tabea Ihsane
2016. Revisiting the loss of verb movement in the history of English.
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 34:2 ► pp. 497 ff.
Hyett, James & Carol Percy
2022.
In English Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 358],
► pp. 264 ff.
Ignat, Anca & Alexandru M. Călin
2019. Of “You” and “Thou,” Lips and Pilgrims in the Translation of Romeo and Juliet’s “Shared Sonnet”: A Hands-On Perspective.
American, British and Canadian Studies 32:1 ► pp. 20 ff.
Jucker, Andreas
2020.
In Politeness in the History of English,
Kytö, Merja
2019. Register in historical linguistics.
Register Studies 1:1 ► pp. 136 ff.
Leitner, Magdalena
2013. Review of Kytö, Grund & Walker (2011): Testifying to Language and Life in Early Modern England.
Journal of Historical Pragmatics 14:2 ► pp. 305 ff.
Mele-Marrero, Margarita & Francisco Alonso-Almeida
2011. The Role of the Pronounsheandshein Seventeenth-Century Obstetric Directives*.
Studia Neophilologica 83:2 ► pp. 169 ff.
Moyna, María Irene, Bettina Kluge & Horst J. Simon
2019.
In It’s not all about you
[Topics in Address Research, 1],
► pp. 2 ff.
Nakayasu, Minako
2021. Spatio-Temporal Systems in Shakespeare’s Dialogues: A Case from Julius Caesar
.
Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 56:s1 ► pp. 425 ff.
Peikola, Matti
2020.
In Voices Past and Present - Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken Texts [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 97],
► pp. 114 ff.
Reisner, Noam
2011. Review of Mazzon (2009): Interactive Dialogue Sequences in Middle English Drama.
Pragmatics & Cognition 19:1 ► pp. 181 ff.
Rodríguez-Puente, Paula
2019.
In Corpus-based Research on Variation in English Legal Discourse [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 91],
► pp. 171 ff.
Twenge, Jean M., W. Keith Campbell & Brittany Gentile
2012. Male and Female Pronoun Use in U.S. Books Reflects Women’s Status, 1900–2008.
Sex Roles 67:9-10 ► pp. 488 ff.
Twenge, Jean M., W. Keith Campbell & Brittany Gentile
2013. Changes in Pronoun Use in American Books and the Rise of Individualism, 1960-2008.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 44:3 ► pp. 406 ff.
Wiśniewska-Przymusińska, Malwina
2020. T/V Pronouns and FTAs in the Works of Sir Thomas Malory: Medieval Politeness and Impoliteness in Directives, Expressives, and Commissives.
Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 55:1 ► pp. 139 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects & Metadata
Linguistics
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN015000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Rhetoric