Part of
Discourse Description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising textEdited by William C. Mann and Sandra A. Thompson
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 16] 1992
► pp. 5–
Edited by William C. Mann and Sandra A. Thompson
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 16] 1992
► pp. 5–
Text as Purposive Communication
A Meaning-based Analysis
Cited by
Cited by 8 other publications
Bender, M. Lionel, M. Lionel Bender, Anthony P. Grant, Anthony P. Grant, Joachim Grzega, Bernd Heine, Bernd Heine, Shin Ja J. Hwang, Masataka Ishikawa, Masataka Ishikawa, Alan S. Kaye, Alan S. Kaye, Jacob J. Spa, Thomas Stolz, Yuri Tambovtsev, Yuri Tambovtsev, Edward J. Vajda, Edward J. Vajda, Elly van Gelderen & Xinzhang Yang
2003. Reviews. <i>WORD</i> 54:2 ► pp. 239 ff. 
Golebiowski, Zofia
2006. The distribution of discoursal salience in research papers: relational hypotaxis and parataxis. Discourse Studies 8:2 ► pp. 259 ff.
Hadisi, Mwana
2012. Exploring the Performance, Semantic, and Cognitive Dimensions of Orality. Missiology: An International Review 40:4 ► pp. 443 ff.
Lee, Patrick Chi-Wai
2016. A DISCOURSE DESCRIPTION OF FOUR FUNDRAISING TEXTS – LINGUISTS MEET PRACTITIONERS: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY. Discourse and Interaction 9:2 ► pp. 25 ff.
MASUDA, HIROKUNI
1995. Versification and reiteration in Hawai'i Creole English: ‘If nomo paila moen, awrail’.. World Englishes 14:3 ► pp. 317 ff.
Masuda, Hirokuni
2002. Narrative Representation Theory: The Macrostructure in I-Language. Discourse Processes 34:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Masuda, Hirokuni
2017. Narrative Representation Theory: Identifying the human language with superstructure. Discourse Studies 19:6 ► pp. 648 ff.
Ramsay, Guy
2001. What are they getting at?Placement of important ideas in lengthy Chinese newstext. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 24:2 ► pp. 17 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.