Part of
Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interactionEdited by Robert Englebretson
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 164] 2007
► pp. 183–219
Edited by Robert Englebretson
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 164] 2007
► pp. 183–219
The role of I guess in conversational stancetaking
Cited by
Cited by 38 other publications
BABEL, ANNA M.
2009. Dizque, evidentiality, and stance in Valley Spanish. Language in Society 38:4 ► pp. 487 ff. 
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar
2011. Double Sayings of GermanJA—More Observations on Their Phonetic Form and Alignment Function. Research on Language & Social Interaction 44:2 ► pp. 157 ff.
Birnie-Smith, Jessica
2023. Framing variation and intersectional identities within Indonesia’s ethnic Chinese minority. Multilingua 42:3 ► pp. 339 ff.
Birnie‐Smith, Jessica
2022. Investigating Structure and Agency in Chinese Indonesians' Identity Work. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 32:3 ► pp. 561 ff.
Cabedo Nebot, Adrián & Carolina Figueras Bates
2018. Chapter 1. Evidentiality in discourse. In Perspectives on Evidentiality in Spanish [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 290], ► pp. 1 ff.
Chindamo, Massimo, Jens Allwood & Elisabeth Ahlsen
2012. 2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing, ► pp. 617 ff.
Choi, Jinsook
2021. ‘I am sorry, but I have to speak Korean’: stancetaking through apology in public speech at an ‘English only’ Korean university. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development ► pp. 1 ff.
Conlin, Luke D. & Rachel E. Scherr
2018. Making Space to Sensemake: Epistemic Distancing in Small Group Physics Discussions. Cognition and Instruction 36:4 ► pp. 396 ff.
Endo, Tomoko & Daisuke Yokomori
2020. Chapter 8. Self-addressed questions as fixed expressions for epistemic stance marking in Japanese conversation. In Fixed Expressions [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 315], ► pp. 203 ff.
Fox, Barbara A. & Sandra A. Thompson
2010. Responses toWh-Questions in English Conversation. Research on Language & Social Interaction 43:2 ► pp. 133 ff.
Gadanidis, Timothy, Angelika Kiss, Lex Konnelly, Katharina Pabst, Lisa Schlegl, Pocholo Umbal & Sali A. Tagliamonte
2023. Integrating qualitative and quantitative analyses of stance: A case study of English that/zero variation. Language in Society 52:1 ► pp. 27 ff.
González, Montserrat
2018. Chapter 7. ‘No sé’. In Perspectives on Evidentiality in Spanish [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 290], ► pp. 147 ff.
Haddington, Pentti
2012. Pragmatics of Stance. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa
2015. Searching for motivations for grammatical patternings. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 453 ff.
Johansson, Marjut
2021. Talking with a Chatbot: Simulated Understanding of Human–Chatbot Communication?. In Analyzing Digital Discourses, ► pp. 105 ff.
Keevallik, Leelo & Ann Weatherall
2020. Chapter 2. ‘I understand’-initiated formulations of the other. In Fixed Expressions [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 315], ► pp. 11 ff.
Lee, Don
2022. Divergence in uncertainty: the Korean non-committal suffix -(u)lkel
. Text & Talk 0:0
Lee, Jieun
2015. Evaluation of court interpreting. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 17:2 ► pp. 167 ff.
Moriya, Tetsuharu & Kaoru Horie
2015. The Neg-Raising Phenomenon as a product of grammaticalization. In New Directions in Grammaticalization Research [Studies in Language Companion Series, 166], ► pp. 121 ff.
Ong, Ben, Scott Barnes & Niels Buus
2022. Developing multiple perspectives by eliding agreement: A conversation analysis of Open Dialogue reflections. Discourse Studies 24:1 ► pp. 47 ff.
Pereira, Gerardine M.
2018. The interface between pragmatics and gesture studies. In Pragmatics and its Interfaces [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 294], ► pp. 163 ff.
Pethica, Stefania, Jonathan Hill, Katy Jones, Paul Tranter, Steve Riley, Heather Lee & Michaela Swales
2020. Developing the therapeutic conversation: a conversation analysis of information giving in Family Domains Therapy. Journal of Family Therapy 42:1 ► pp. 15 ff.
Rodríguez Louro, Celeste
2015. The evolution of epistemic marking in West Australian English. In Grammatical Change in English World-Wide [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 67], ► pp. 205 ff.
RODRÍGUEZ LOURO, CELESTE & THOMAS HARRIS
2013. Evolution with an attitude: the grammaticalisation of epistemic/evidential verbs in Australian English. English Language and Linguistics 17:3 ► pp. 415 ff.
Sabet, Peyman G.P. & Grace Q. Zhang
2018. The Pragmatic Functions of ‘I Don't Think’ and ‘I Think + Not’. Australian Journal of Linguistics 38:3 ► pp. 421 ff.
Sandhu, Priti
2015. Resisting linguistic marginalization in professional spaces: Constructing multi-layered oppositional stances. Applied Linguistics Review 6:3 ► pp. 369 ff.
Siromaa, Maarit & Mirka Rauniomaa
2021. Stance and Evaluation. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 95 ff.
Szczyrbak, Magdalena
2017. Modal Adverbs of Certainty in EU Legal Discourse: A Parallel Corpus Approach. In Contrastive Analysis of Discourse-pragmatic Aspects of Linguistic Genres [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, 5], ► pp. 91 ff.
Szczyrbak, Magdalena
2020. VERB PATTERNS IN TRIAL DISCOURSE: THE CASE OF I THINK. Discourse and Interaction 13:2 ► pp. 119 ff.
Travis, Catherine E. & Rena Torres Cacoullos
VAN BOGAERT, JULIE
2010. A constructional taxonomy ofI thinkand related expressions: accounting for the variability of complement-taking mental predicates. English Language and Linguistics 14:3 ► pp. 399 ff.
Wan, Helen
2020. Chapter 7. Understanding stancetaking through gestures and linguistic practices in a public political debate in Hong Kong. In Analysing Chinese Language and Discourse across Layers and Genres [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 13], ► pp. 120 ff.
Wang, Wei & Hongyin Tao
2020. Chapter 6. From matrix clause to turn expansion. In Emergent Syntax for Conversation [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 32], ► pp. 151 ff.
Weatherall, Ann & Leelo Keevallik
2016. When Claims of Understanding Are Less Than Affiliative. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49:3 ► pp. 167 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2021. Fundamentals of Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 13 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.