Part of
Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interactionEdited by Robert Englebretson
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 164] 2007
► pp. 253–281
Edited by Robert Englebretson
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 164] 2007
► pp. 253–281
Stancetaking as an interactional activity: Challenging the prior speaker
Cited by
Cited by 22 other publications
Bonnin, Juan Eduardo
2019. Double stance discourse: Managing social and personal identity at work. Discourse & Society 30:4 ► pp. 359 ff. 
Chindamo, Massimo, Jens Allwood & Elisabeth Ahlsen
2012. 2012 International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing, ► pp. 617 ff.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, Sandra A. Thompson & Barbara A. Fox
2023. Chapter 12. Do English affirmative polar interrogatives with any favor negative responses?. In Responding to Polar Questions across Languages and Contexts [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 35], ► pp. 350 ff.
Haddington, Pentti
2012. Pragmatics of Stance. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Hebenstreit, Bryanna L. & Alan Zemel
2021. Chapter 1.2. Affect in interaction. In How Emotions Are Made in Talk [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 321], ► pp. 51 ff.
Heinemann, Trine
2008. Questions of accountability: yes—no interrogatives that are unanswerable. Discourse Studies 10:1 ► pp. 55 ff.
Herder, Anke, Jan Berenst, Kees de Glopper & Tom Koole
2022. Conversational functions of ‘I know’, ‘you know’ and ‘we know’ in collaborative writing of primary school children. Classroom Discourse 13:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Johansson, Marjut
2015. Bravo for this editorial!. In Follow-ups in Political Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 60], ► pp. 83 ff.
Kiesling, Scott F., Umashanthi Pavalanathan, Jim Fitzpatrick, Xiaochuang Han & Jacob Eisenstein
2018. Interactional Stancetaking in Online Forums. Computational Linguistics 44:4 ► pp. 683 ff.
Klein, Gabriella B., Koffi M. Dossou & Sergio Pasquandrea
2014. Embodying epistemicity. In Communicating Certainty and Uncertainty in Medical, Supportive and Scientific Contexts [Dialogue Studies, 25], ► pp. 223 ff.
Laanesoo, Kirsi & Leelo Keevallik
2017. Noticing Breaches with Nonpolar Interrogatives: EstonianKes(“Who”) Ascribing Responsibility for Problematic Conduct. Research on Language and Social Interaction 50:3 ► pp. 286 ff.
Matalon, Nadav
2021. Chapter 6. The Camel Humps prosodic pattern. In Building Categories in Interaction [Studies in Language Companion Series, 220], ► pp. 155 ff.
Nguyen, Hanh thi & Minh Thi Thuy Nguyen
2021. ‘But I want to say “I means love you”’. Research on Children and Social Interaction 5:2
Postoutenko, Kirill & Olga Sabelfeld
2021. Temporal comparisons, historical semantics of interaction and ‘post-war consensus’ in British Parliament: Studying time references in a deliberative environment. Time & Society 30:4 ► pp. 598 ff.
Riccioni, Ilaria, Andrzej Zuczkowski, Roberto Burro, Ramona Bongelli & Claudia Felser
2022. The Italian epistemic marker mi sa [to me it knows] compared to so [I know], non so [I don’t know], non so se [I don’t know whether], credo [I believe], penso [I think]. PLOS ONE 17:9 ► pp. e0274694 ff.
Soler, Josep & Lídia Gallego-Balsà
2019. Clashing Stances Towards Catalan: An Ethnographic Study in a Small University in Catalonia. In The Sociolinguistics of Higher Education, ► pp. 67 ff.
Szczyrbak, Magdalena
2016. Say and stancetaking in courtroom talk: a corpus-assisted study. Corpora 11:2 ► pp. 143 ff.
Szczyrbak, Magdalena
2017. Modal Adverbs of Certainty in EU Legal Discourse: A Parallel Corpus Approach. In Contrastive Analysis of Discourse-pragmatic Aspects of Linguistic Genres [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, 5], ► pp. 91 ff.
Zhao, Liang
2023. Identity negotiation of Han women in Han-Hui-Muslim intermarriage in China: A dialogical-self theory approach. Culture & Psychology
Zinken, Jörg & Uwe-A. Küttner
2022. Offering an Interpretation of Prior Talk in Everyday Interaction: A Semantic Map Approach. Discourse Processes 59:4 ► pp. 298 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.