Impoliteness in Interaction
| University of Central Lancashire, UK
This study concerns the nature of impoliteness in face-to-face spoken interaction. For more than three decades many pragmatic and sociolinguistic studies of interaction have considered politeness to be one central explanatory concept governing and underpinning face-to-face interaction. Politeness' "evil twin" impoliteness has been largely neglected until only very recently. This book, the first of its kind on the subject, considers the role that impoliteness has to play by drawing extracts from a range of discourse types (car parking disputes, army and police training, police-public interactions and kitchen discourse). The study considers the triggering of impoliteness; explores the dynamic progression of impolite exchanges, and examines the way in which such exchanges come to some form of resolution. 'Face' and the linguistic sophistication and manipulation of discoursally expected norms to cause, or deflect impoliteness is also explored, as is the dynamic and sometimes hotly contested nature of an individual's socio-discoursal role.
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 167] 2008. xiii, 281 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
Acknowledgements
|
xi
|
|
Preface
|
xiii
|
|
Chapter 1. Impoliteness in interaction
|
1–19
|
|
Chapter 2. Implicature: (Mis)understanding grice
|
21–32
|
|
Chapter 3. Face within a model of im/politeness
|
33–42
|
|
Chapter 4. Perspectives on politeness and impoliteness
|
43–97
|
|
Chapter 5. The realisation of impoliteness
|
99–143
|
|
Chapter 6. The dynamics of impoliteness I: Dynamics at the utterance level
|
145–167
|
|
Chapter 7. The dynamics of impoliteness II: Dynamics at the discoursal level
|
169–221
|
|
Chapter 8. The dynamics of impoliteness III: Exploiting the rules of the turn taking system
|
223–260
|
|
Chapter 9. Conclusion
|
261–267
|
|
Tables and figures
|
|
|
Bibliography and references
|
269–277
|
|
Index
|
279–281
|
“Impoliteness in Interaction is an insightful read that successfully advocates a dynamic study of not only impoliteness, but discourse in general. Bousfield does an excellent job of showing how impoliteness strategies combine via textual examples and persuasively argues that such strategies do not occur in isolation. The data discussed are entertaining and are used in a succinct manner to demonstrate the intended phenomenon. The book is intended primarily as a reference for those doing research in these areas but would also fit nicely in a graduate-level seminar on politeness, social interaction or pragmatics. Overall, I recommend Impoliteness in Interaction as an illuminating, entertaining and well-researched read that sheds light on a much ignored area of social interaction.”
Hannele Nicholson, University of Notre Dame, on Linguist List 21.3494
“Impoliteness in Interaction is the first monograph to focus solely on impoliteness and as such represents a very substantial and impressive contribution to our understanding about what impoliteness is, the ways in which it comes about and how it is realized in the dynamics of actual language use in particular discourses. [...] This book is very much to be welcomed as a thought-provoking, knowledgeable and generally accessible exploration of some important new and difficult theoretical ground in the field of im/politeness research, supported by compelling and interesting data.”
Sandra J. Harris, Nottingham Trent University, in Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, Vol. 21:1 (2011)
“In the field of communication, scholars in language and social interaction will find Bousfield's book interesting and useful as it builds on key scholars in our area and offers a valuable portrait of impoliteness in institutional encounters. In addition, Bousfield's book should be of interest to interpersonal communication reseachers who study the dark side of interpersonal life. In providing a rich, nuanced sense of how people challenge, criticize, and attack each other in institutional relationships, his work offers a template that may aid researchers interested in these communicative conduct issues in close relationships.”
Karen Tracy,
University of Colorado, Boulder, Journal of Communication, Volume 59 (2009).
“This is a significant and very welcome contribution to the growing research on linguistic politeness in that it is the first full-length study of impoliteness of its kind. There is a long tradition of research on 'politeness' but there is no full-length work on impoliteness available. Impoliteness in Interaction fills the research gap in the study of linguistic politeness, and is accessible to general students.”
Abhishek Kumar Kashyap,
Macquarie University, Language and Literature, Vol. 18:1 (2009)
“This is a challenging and insightful book which attempts to examine exactly what impoliteness is, what its function is in interaction and how we can go about analysing it. [...] This book is important in signalling a change in the direction of much politeness research. [...] This book challenged many of my presuppositions about impoliteness and is clearly part of a new discourse-oriented school of politeness and impoliteness research. It provides clear guidelines on how to analyse impoliteness and blazes a trail for a more data-drive type of politeness research.”
Sara Mills,
Sheffield Hallam University, Discourse and Society, Vol. 22:1 (2010)
Cited by
Cited by other publications
No author info given
2016.
In Mock Politeness in English and Italian [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 267],
No author info given
2016.
In Requests in American and British English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 265],
No author info given
2018.
In Cognitive Rhetoric [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 31],
No author info given
2018.
In Threatening in English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 284],
No author info given
2018. Typology of impoliteness strategies in the discourse of W. Shakespeare.
The Journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University Series: Foreign Philology. Methods of Foreign Language Teaching :87
No author info given
2019.
In Conversational Humour and (Im)politeness [Topics in Humor Research, 8],
No author info given
2020.
In Bonding through Context [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 314],
No author info given
2020.
In Manners, Norms and Transgressions in the History of English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 312],
No author info given
2020.
In Manners, Norms and Transgressions in the History of English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 312],
No author info given
2020.
In Politeness in Professional Contexts [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 311],
No author info given
2020.
In Politeness in Professional Contexts [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 311],
No author info given
2020.
In Politeness in Professional Contexts [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 311],
No author info given
2020. Aggression in media-sharing websites in the context of Greek political/parliamentary discourse in the years of the economic crisis.
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict
No author info given
2020. Dear friends, traitors and filthy dogs.
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict
No author info given
2020. Heterogeneous distribution of cultural conceptualizations and (im)politeness evaluations.
International Journal of Language and Culture 7:1
A. Locher, Miriam
2012.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Abhishek, Kumar Kashyap
2011. Book review: Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice.
Discourse & Society 22:6 ► pp. 817 ff.
Aijmer, Karin
2018.
In Positioning the Self and Others [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 292],
► pp. 177 ff.
Alemi, Minoo & Sajedeh Razaghi
2012. Politeness markers in English for business purposes textbook.
International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning 2:3
Allan, Keith
2016.
In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 4],
► pp. 397 ff.
Amri, Kais
2013. Contexte et théorie de l’impolitesse dans quelques comédies de Molière.
Multilinguales :2 ► pp. 155 ff.
Archer, Dawn
2014.
In Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 243],
► pp. 277 ff.
Arroyo, José Luis Blas
2013.
In Real Talk: Reality Television and Discourse Analysis in Action,
► pp. 218 ff.
Badarneh, Muhammad A.
2020. ‘Like a donkey carrying books’.
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Badarneh, Muhammad A., Kawakib Al-Momani & Fathi Migdadi
2017. Performing acts of impoliteness through code-switching to English in colloquial Jordanian Arabic interactions.
Pragmatics and Society 8:3
Badarneh, Muhammad A., Kawakib Al-Momani & Fathi Migdadi
2017. Performing acts of impoliteness through code-switching to English in colloquial Jordanian Arabic interactions.
Pragmatics and Society 8:4 ► pp. 571 ff.
Baider, Fabienne H., Georgeta Cislaru & Chantal Claudel
2020. Researching Politeness: From the ‘Classical’ Approach to Discourse Analysis … and Back.
Corpus Pragmatics
Bell, Nancy D.
2018.
In Pragmatics and its Interfaces [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 294],
► pp. 291 ff.
Bella, Spyridoula
2014. A contrastive study of apologies performed by Greek native speakers and English learners of Greek as a foreign language.
Pragmatics 24:4 ► pp. 679 ff.
Bella, Spyridoula
2019.
In From Speech Acts to Lay Understandings of Politeness,
► pp. 27 ff.
Blitvich, Pilar Garcés-Conejos & Nuria Lorenzo-Dus
2013.
In Real Talk: Reality Television and Discourse Analysis in Action,
► pp. 9 ff.
Bobin, Joanna
2011.
In New Perspectives in Language, Discourse and Translation Studies [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ],
► pp. 165 ff.
Bonacchi, Silvia
2018.
In Handbuch Pragmatik,
► pp. 439 ff.
Borràs-Comes, Joan, Rafèu Sichel-Bazin & Pilar Prieto
2015. Vocative Intonation Preferences are Sensitive to Politeness Factors.
Language and Speech 58:1 ► pp. 68 ff.
Bortoluzzi, Maria & Elena Semino
2016. Face attack in Italian politics.
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 4:2 ► pp. 178 ff.
Bousfield, Derek
2014.
In The International Encyclopedia of Communication,
Bousfield, Derek
2015.
In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction,
► pp. 1 ff.
Boxer, Diana & Joseph Radice
2018. Bickering.
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 6:2 ► pp. 177 ff.
Brown, Lucien
2015.
In The Handbook of Korean Linguistics,
► pp. 303 ff.
Bryan, Eric Shane
2013. Indirect Aggression: A Pragmatic Analysis of the Quarrel of the Queens in Völsungasaga, Þiðreks Saga, and Das Nibelungenlied.
Neophilologus 97:2 ► pp. 349 ff.
Culpeper, Jonathan
2013.
In Handbook of Pragmatics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Culpeper, Jonathan
2015.
In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction,
► pp. 1 ff.
Culpeper, Jonathan
2016.
In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 4],
► pp. 421 ff.
Culpeper, Jonathan & Claire Hardaker
2017.
In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness,
► pp. 199 ff.
Culpeper, Jonathan, Michael Haugh & Valeria Sinkeviciute
2017.
In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness,
► pp. 323 ff.
Culpeper, Jonathan & Oliver Holmes
2013.
In Real Talk: Reality Television and Discourse Analysis in Action,
► pp. 169 ff.
Culpeper, Jonathan, Paul Iganski & Abe Sweiry
2017. Linguistic impoliteness and religiously aggravated hate crime in England and Wales.
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 5:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Danielewicz-Betz, Anna
2016.
In Communicating in Digital Age Corporations,
► pp. 139 ff.
Dekhissi, Laurie, F. Neveu, G. Bergounioux, M.-H. Côté, J.-M. Fournier, L. Hriba & S. Prévost
2016. DeComme t’es jalouse !àComment t’es belle !Variation dans l’emploi des exclamatives en français parlé.
SHS Web of Conferences 27 ► pp. 13004 ff.
Dervin, Fred & Monica Vlad
2010. Pour une cyberanthropologie de la communication interculturelle – Analyse d'interactions en ligne entre étudiants finlandais et roumains.
Alsic :Vol. 13
Dynel, Marta
2009. Beyond a Joke: Types of Conversational Humour.
Language and Linguistics Compass 3:5 ► pp. 1284 ff.
Dynel, Marta
2015.
In Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 256],
► pp. 157 ff.
Dynel, Marta
2018.
In The Pragmatics of Irony and Banter [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 30],
► pp. 41 ff.
Dynel, Marta
2018. Theoretically on Mock Politeness in English and Italian.
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 6:1 ► pp. 149 ff.
Eller, Monika
2018.
In The Discursive Construction of Identities On- and Offline [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 78],
► pp. 177 ff.
Fernández-Amaya, Lucía
2020. Managing conflict originated by feminism.
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8:1 ► pp. 88 ff.
Fernández-García, Francisco
2016. Mecanismos interaccionales al servicio de la descortesía en el debate político.
Spanish in Context 13:2 ► pp. 263 ff.
Formentelli, Maicol & John Hajek
2016. Address practices in academic interactions in a pluricentric language.
Pragmatics 26:4 ► pp. 631 ff.
Gavins, Joanna
2009. The year’s work in stylistics 2008.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 18:4 ► pp. 367 ff.
Gavins, Joanna & Paul Simpson
2015. Regina v John Terry: The discursive construction of an alleged racist event.
Discourse & Society 26:6 ► pp. 712 ff.
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra & Maria Vasilaki
2018. The personal and/as the political.
Internet Pragmatics 1:2 ► pp. 215 ff.
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra & Maria Vasilaki
2020.
In (Im)politeness and Moral Order in Online Interactions [Benjamins Current Topics, 107],
► pp. 11 ff.
Giles, Renuka M., Kathrin Rothermich & Marc D. Pell
2019. Differences in the Evaluation of Prosocial Lies: A Cross-Cultural Study of Canadian, Chinese, and German Adults.
Frontiers in Communication 4
Gong, Lili & Yongping Ran
2019. Review of Kádár, Dániel Z. (2017) Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction
.
Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 29:1 ► pp. 133 ff.
Handford, Michael & Almut Koester
2019. The construction of conflict talk across workplace contexts: (towards) a theory of conflictual compact.
Language Awareness 28:3 ► pp. 186 ff.
Harris, Sandra
2011.
In Politeness Across Cultures,
► pp. 258 ff.
Hassan, Bahaa-eddin A.
2019. Impolite viewer responses in Arabic political TV talk shows on YouTube.
Pragmatics 29:4 ► pp. 521 ff.
Haugh, Michael & Valeria Sinkeviciute
2018. Accusations and interpersonal conflict in televised multi-party interactions amongst speakers of (Argentinian and Peninsular) Spanish.
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 6:2 ► pp. 248 ff.
Holmes, Janet
2012.
In The Handbook of Intercultural Discourse and Communication,
► pp. 205 ff.
Horgan, Mervyn
2019. Everyday incivility and the urban interaction order.
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7:1 ► pp. 32 ff.
Horgan, Mervyn
2020. Urban interaction ritual.
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:1 ► pp. 116 ff.
Horst, Pim van der
2017. Doe zelf eens normaal, communistische smeris! : een vergelijking van ontoelaatbaar taalgebruik in de parlementen van Nederland en Tsjechië.
Brünner Beiträge zur Germanistik und Nordistik :1 ► pp. 129 ff.
House, Juliane
2012. (Im)politeness in cross-cultural encounters.
Language and Intercultural Communication 12:4 ► pp. 284 ff.
Hugou, Vincent
2011. « You little zit! » ou quand une sitcom américaine est génératrice d’insultes.
Anglophonia :15 (30) ► pp. 119 ff.
Hultgren, Anna Kristina
2019.
In Technology Mediated Service Encounters [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 300],
► pp. 97 ff.
Jobert, Manuel
2010. L’impolitesse linguistique : vers un nouveau paradigme de recherche ?.
Lexis :HS 2
Jucker, Andreas
2020.
In Politeness in the History of English,
Jucker, Andreas H. & Joanna Kopaczyk
2017.
In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness,
► pp. 433 ff.
Kienpointner, Manfred & Maria Stopfner
2017.
In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness,
► pp. 61 ff.
Kleinke, Sonja & Birte Bös
2015. Intergroup rudeness and the metapragmatics of its negotiation in online discussion fora.
Pragmatics 25:1 ► pp. 47 ff.
Koczogh, Helga Vanda
2014.
In The Evidential Basis of Linguistic Argumentation [Studies in Language Companion Series, 153],
► pp. 133 ff.
Kumar, Ritesh
2020. #shutdownjnu vs #standwithjnu.
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 8:1 ► pp. 29 ff.
Kádár, Dániel Z.
2014. Heckling — A mimetic-interpersonal perspective.
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 2:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini
2011.
In Politeness Across Cultures,
► pp. 1 ff.
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Juliane House
2019. Ritual frame and ‘politeness markers’.
Pragmatics and Society 10:4 ► pp. 639 ff.
Křížová, Kateřina, Markéta Kluková, Benjamin Bossaert, Pim van der Horst & Wilken Engelbrecht
2017.
In Capita Selecta z nizozemské lingvistiky,
Lee, Sungbom
2018. Flaming in Internet Forums on Abortion: A Contrastive Pragmatic Analysis.
Lanaguage Research 54:3 ► pp. 399 ff.
Li, Bingyun & Chaoqun Xie
2019. Betty J. Birner. 2013. Introduction to pragmatics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Pp. x + 344. CAN $48.95 (softcover)..
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 64:1 ► pp. 155 ff.
Locher, Miriam A.
2018.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Locher, Miriam A., Brook Bolander & Nicole Höhn
2015. Introducing relational work in Facebook and discussion boards.
Pragmatics 25:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria & Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2013.
In Real Talk: Reality Television and Discourse Analysis in Action,
► pp. 24 ff.
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Patricia Bou-Franch & Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2013.
In Real Talk: Reality Television and Discourse Analysis in Action,
► pp. 199 ff.
Loveday, Leo John
2018. The sarcastic implicatures of an ambivalent villain: Dahl’s Willy Wonka.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 27:2 ► pp. 86 ff.
Matusz, Łukasz
2017.
In Multiculturalism, Multilingualism and the Self [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ],
► pp. 33 ff.
McIntyre, Dan & Derek Bousfield
2017.
In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness,
► pp. 759 ff.
Mehrabi Boshrabadi, Abbas & Sepideh Bataghva Sarabi
2016. Cyber-communic
tion etiquette.
Interactive Technology and Smart Education 13:2 ► pp. 86 ff.
tion etiquette.
Interactive Technology and Smart Education 13:2 ► pp. 86 ff. Miller-Ott, Aimee E. & Lynne Kelly
2017. A Politeness Theory Analysis of Cell-Phone Usage in the Presence of Friends.
Communication Studies 68:2 ► pp. 190 ff.
Mills, Sara
2017.
In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness,
► pp. 41 ff.
Mkhitaryan, Yelena & Sona Tumanyan
2015. On Differences in the Use of Hedging in English and Armenian Academic Discourse.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 197 ► pp. 2506 ff.
Morady Moghaddam, Mostafa
2019.
In Further Advances in Pragmatics and Philosophy: Part 2 Theories and Applications [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 20],
► pp. 469 ff.
Morady Moghaddam, Mostafa
2019.
In The Praxis of Indirect Reports [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 21],
► pp. 21 ff.
Morady Moghaddam, Mostafa
2019.
In The Praxis of Indirect Reports [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 21],
► pp. 137 ff.
Mostoufi, Khorshid
2014. Manipulative Language and Loss of Identity in Harold Pinter's The Birthday Party: A Pragmatic Study.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 134 ► pp. 146 ff.
Mugford, Gerrard
2014. Examining first-order localised politeness: Mexicanpositive impolitenesspractices.
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 2:1 ► pp. 99 ff.
Márquez Reiter, Rosina
2016. Marina Terkourafi (ed.) 2015.Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Im/politeness..
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 4:1 ► pp. 148 ff.
Márquez Reiter, Rosina, Kristina Ganchenko & Anna Charalambidou
2016. Requests and counters in Russian traffic police officer-citizen encounters.
Pragmatics and Society 7:4 ► pp. 512 ff.
Nevala, Minna & Anni Sairio
2017.
In Exploring Future Paths for Historical Sociolinguistics [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 7],
► pp. 109 ff.
Nijakowska, Joanna
2014.
In Classroom-oriented Research [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ],
► pp. 139 ff.
Nowak, Bartholomäus
2019.
In Political Discourse in Central, Eastern and Balkan Europe [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 84],
► pp. 147 ff.
Ogiermann, Eva & Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2019.
In From Speech Acts to Lay Understandings of Politeness,
► pp. 1 ff.
O’Connell, Daniel C. & Sabine Kowal
2012.
In Dialogical Genres,
► pp. 3 ff.
Pacheco Baldó, Rosa María
2019. Impoliteness Strategies and Social Characteristics. An Analysis of Films in Peninsular Spanish and American English Speakers at Work.
Journal of Intercultural Communication Research 48:6 ► pp. 608 ff.
Paternoster, Annick
2012. Inappropriate inspectors: Impoliteness and overpoliteness in Ian Rankin’s and Andrea Camilleri’s crime series.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 21:3 ► pp. 311 ff.
Payne‐Woolridge, Ruth
2010. Classroom behaviour and facework: balancing threats and enhancements.
Classroom Discourse 1:2 ► pp. 167 ff.
Perelmutter, Renee
2015.
In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Im/politeness [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 14],
► pp. 149 ff.
Pillière, Linda
2018.
In The Pragmatics of Irony and Banter [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 30],
► pp. 141 ff.
Raizen, Adina, Nikos Vergis & Kiel Christianson
2015.
In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Im/politeness [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 14],
► pp. 213 ff.
Ren, Wei
2019. Emancipating (im)politeness research and increasing its impact.
Acta Linguistica Academica 66:2 ► pp. 289 ff.
Renkema, Jan & Christoph Schubert
2018.
In Introduction to Discourse Studies,
Rieger, Caroline L.
2017. “I want a real apology”.
Pragmatics 27:4 ► pp. 553 ff.
Rizka, Budi, Lismalinda, Adnan, Moriyanti & Faisal
2020. JOKOWI VS PRABOWO: THE POLITENESS AND ITS VIOLATION IN POLITICAL COMMUNICATION OF INDONESIAN PRESIDENT CANDIDATES.
Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews 8:3 ► pp. 31 ff.
Rusieshvili, Manana
2011.
In Politeness Across Cultures,
► pp. 149 ff.
Sadeghi, Mansoureh Sadat
2017. The Difference in Negative Interactive Pattern and Impoliteness Discourse in Iranian Incompatible Couples: the Role of Gender.
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction 15:2 ► pp. 356 ff.
Santamaría-García, Carmen
2017. Emotional and Educational Consequences of (Im)politeness in Teacher–Student Interaction at Higher Education.
Corpus Pragmatics 1:3 ► pp. 233 ff.
Scharloth, Joachim
2018.
In Sprachliche Gewalt,
► pp. 7 ff.
Schröder, Ulrike
2018. Face as an interactional construct in the context of connectedness and separateness.
Pragmatics 28:4 ► pp. 547 ff.
Semino, Elena
2014. Pragmatic failure, mind style and characterisation in fiction about autism.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 23:2 ► pp. 141 ff.
Sharifian, Farzad & Tahmineh Tayebi
2017.
In Advances in Cultural Linguistics [Cultural Linguistics, ],
► pp. 389 ff.
Sifianou, Maria
2010. Derek Bousfield & Miriam A. Locher (eds.), Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2008. Pp viii, 346. Hb $125.00..
Language in Society 39:1 ► pp. 119 ff.
Sifianou, Maria & Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2017.
In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness,
► pp. 571 ff.
Silva, Daniel
2017.
In Language and Violence [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 279],
► pp. 1 ff.
SIMONIN, Olivier
2018. Sens implicite, implicatures et principes d’inférence.
Corela :HS-25
Sinkeviciute, Valeria
2015. “There’s definitely gonna be some serious carnage in this house” or how to be genuinely impolite inBig BrotherUK.
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3:2 ► pp. 317 ff.
Sinkeviciute, Valeria
2018. “Ya bloody drongo!!!”.
Internet Pragmatics 1:2 ► pp. 271 ff.
Sinkeviciute, Valeria
2020.
In (Im)politeness and Moral Order in Online Interactions [Benjamins Current Topics, 107],
► pp. 67 ff.
Sorlin, Sandrine
2016.
In Language and Manipulation in House of Cards,
► pp. 1 ff.
Sorlin, Sandrine
2016.
In Language and Manipulation in House of Cards,
► pp. 107 ff.
Stamouli, Eirini
2020. Who’s afraid of aggression.
Translation and Translanguaging in Multilingual Contexts 6:1 ► pp. 9 ff.
Tajeddin, Zia, Minoo Alemi & Sajedeh Razzaghi
2014. Cross-cultural Perceptions of Impoliteness by Native English Speakers and EFL Learners: The Case of Apology Speech Act.
Journal of Intercultural Communication Research 43:4 ► pp. 304 ff.
Tajeddin, Zia & Maryam Pezeshki
2014. Acquisition of Politeness Markers in an EFL Context: Impact of Input Enhancement and Output Tasks.
RELC Journal 45:3 ► pp. 269 ff.
Taylor, Charlotte
2015. Beyond sarcasm: The metalanguage and structures of mock politeness.
Journal of Pragmatics 87 ► pp. 127 ff.
Terry, Adeline
2020. Euphemistic dysphemisms and dysphemistic euphemisms as means to convey irony and banter.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 29:1 ► pp. 57 ff.
Turbide, Olivier & Marty Laforest
2015. Interview politique et construction interactionnelle de l’impolitesse. L’efficacité de la parole conflictuelle pour un public absent.
Semen :40
Vaughan, Elaine & Brian Clancy
2011. The pragmatics of Irish English.
English Today 27:2 ► pp. 47 ff.
Vergis, Nikos & Marina Terkourafi
2015. The Role of the Speaker’s Emotional State in Im/politeness Assessments.
Journal of Language and Social Psychology 34:3 ► pp. 316 ff.
Vogel, Carl
2014.
In Recent Advances of Neural Network Models and Applications [Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 26],
► pp. 395 ff.
Vogel, Carl
2014. Denoting Offence.
Cognitive Computation 6:4 ► pp. 628 ff.
Vogel, Carl
2015.
In Conflict and Multimodal Communication,
► pp. 223 ff.
Wee, Lionel
2015. Adding insult to inquiry.
Pragmatics and Society 6:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Witczak-Plisiecka, Iwona
2012. On Apologising in Negative and Positive Politeness Cultures.
Journal of Pragmatics 44:4 ► pp. 529 ff.
Woch, Agnieszka
2019. Le rôle du mot dans le discours des campagnes sociétales.
Białostockie Archiwum Językowe 19 ► pp. 403 ff.
Xiaofei, Ren, Li Lanlan, Zhang Chuanrui, Lu Jing & Liu Feng
2014. Corpus stylistics of drama in drama translation studies: (Im)politeness in two Chinese versions of Miller’s Death of a Salesman.
Babel 60:4 ► pp. 425 ff.
Zawiszová, Halina
2018.
In On ´doing friendship´ in and through talk: Exploring conversational interactions of Japanese young people,
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 02 july 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number: 2007031921