Article published in:
Contrastive Rhetoric: Reaching to intercultural rhetoricEdited by Ulla Connor, Ed Nagelhout and William Rozycki
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 169] 2008
► pp. 277–298
A conversation on contrastive rhetoric: Dwight Atkinson and Paul Kei Matsuda talk about issues, conceptualizations, and the future of contrastive rhetoric
Paul Kei Matsuda | Arizona State University
Dwight Atkinson | Purdue University
This conversation took place on the evening of September 25, 2004, in an old house on an island in Maine. Because contrastive rhetoric (CR) may be at a crucial point in its history – and one which invites fundamental rethinking – we decided to match this exploratory moment with an equally exploratory genre: the academic conversation. Our intent was not to come to univocal agreement or to state a general theory; instead, we sought to develop our thoughts and feelings about CR through friendly but serious dialogue. It should be clear that both of us have complex feelings about CR. We thought that this was an opportune place from which to begin to examine its future possibilities and implications.
Published online: 09 January 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.169.18mat
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.169.18mat
Cited by
Cited by 9 other publications
Jones, Natasha N., Kristen R. Moore & Rebecca Walton
Liu, Xinghua & Clare Furneaux
Liu, Xinghua & Clare Furneaux
Paiz, Joshua M. & James E. Coda
Walton, Rebecca
Wang, Junhua
Wang, Junhua & Pinfan Zhu
Xu, Zhichang
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 may 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.