A Semiotic Approach to Fictive Interaction as a Representational Strategy in Communicative Meaning Construction

Brandt, Line

doi:10.1075/pbns.170.05bra

Part of

Mental Spaces in Discourse and Interaction
Edited by Todd Oakley and Anders Hougaard
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 170] 2008
► pp. 109–148

A Semiotic Approach to Fictive Interaction as a Representational Strategy in Communicative Meaning Construction

Line Brandt

Published online: 6 March 2008

https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.170.05bra

Cited by

Cited by 15 other publications

Order by:

Baranyiné Kóczy, Judit

2018. Reference Point Constructions. In Nature, Metaphor, Culture [Cultural Linguistics, ], ► pp. 189 ff.

Brandt, Line

2009. Subjectivity in the act of representing: The case for subjective motion and change. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8:4 ► pp. 573 ff.

Brandt, Line

2014. Metaphor and the Communicative Mind. SSRN Electronic Journal

Fonseca, Paula, Esther Pascual & Todd Oakley

2020. “Hi, Mr. President!”. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18:1 ► pp. 180 ff.

Jarque, Maria Josep & Esther Pascual

2021. From gesture- and sign-in-interaction to grammar: Fictive questions for relative clauses in signed languages. Languages and Modalities 1 ► pp. 81 ff.

OAKLEY, TODD & VERA TOBIN

2014. The whole is sometimes less than the sum of its parts: toward a theory of document acts. Language and Cognition 6:1 ► pp. 79 ff.

Pan, Yun

2019. Meaning construction in interactive academic talk. Pragmatics & Cognition 26:2-3 ► pp. 414 ff.

Pascual, Esther & Sergeiy Sandler

2016. Fictive interaction and the conversation frame. In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55], ► pp. 3 ff.

PLESHAKOVA, ANNA

2014. Strike, accident, risk, and counter-factuality: hidden meanings of the post-Soviet Russian news discourse of the 1990s via conceptual blending. Language and Cognition 6:3 ► pp. 301 ff.

Wilson, Anna

2020. It’s Time to Do News Again. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 68:4 ► pp. 379 ff.

Xiang, Mingjian

2016. Real, imaginary, or fictive?. In The Conversation Frame [Human Cognitive Processing, 55], ► pp. 63 ff.

Xiang, Mingjian & Esther Pascual

2022. Debate with zhuangzi. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 137 ff.

[no author supplied]

2014. Fictive Interaction [Human Cognitive Processing, 47],

[no author supplied]

2018. The Poetics of Time – Metaphors and Blends in Language and Literature [Figurative Thought and Language, 3],

[no author supplied]

2023. Fictive questions in the Zhuangzi [Figurative Thought and Language, 18],

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.