Request Strategies
A comparative study in Mandarin Chinese and Korean
| Curtin University of Technology, Australia
| Curtin University of Technology, Australia
This book investigates request strategies in Mandarin Chinese and Korean, and is one of the first attempts to address cross-cultural strategies employed in the speech act of requests in two non-Western languages. The data, drawn from role-plays and naturally recorded conversations, complement each other in terms of exhaustiveness and authenticity.
This study explores the similarities and differences of the request patterns that emerged in the Chinese and Korean data, and the intricate relation between request strategies and social factors (such as power and distance). The findings raise questions about the influence of methodology on data, and the applicability of so called universals to East Asian languages. They also offer new insights into generally held ideas of directness and requesting behaviours in Chinese and Korean, and the problems of cross-cultural and cross-linguistic communication. This research is suggestive for the disciplines of cross-cultural pragmatics, cross-cultural communication, contrastive linguistics, applied linguistics and discourse analysis.
This study explores the similarities and differences of the request patterns that emerged in the Chinese and Korean data, and the intricate relation between request strategies and social factors (such as power and distance). The findings raise questions about the influence of methodology on data, and the applicability of so called universals to East Asian languages. They also offer new insights into generally held ideas of directness and requesting behaviours in Chinese and Korean, and the problems of cross-cultural and cross-linguistic communication. This research is suggestive for the disciplines of cross-cultural pragmatics, cross-cultural communication, contrastive linguistics, applied linguistics and discourse analysis.
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 177] 2008. xv, 320 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
|
Preface
|
xi–xii
|
|
Abbreviations, conventions and notations
|
xiii–xv
|
|
1. Introduction
|
1–6
|
|
2. Previous studies
|
7–32
|
|
3. Methodology
|
33–56
|
|
4. Individual situation comparisons
|
57–116
|
|
5. Comparisons of social variables
|
117–178
|
|
6. General discussion
|
180–207
|
|
7. Sequential analysis of turn-taking
|
209–292
|
|
8. Conclusions
|
293–297
|
|
Appendix: Request scenarios
|
299–306
|
|
References
|
307–311
|
|
Glossary of technical terms
|
313–316
|
|
Name index
|
317
|
|
Sunject index
|
319–320
|
“The major part of the book consists of a clear, systematic and very well organized description of a natural speech database. The exhaustive comparison, which addresses both linguistic and social aspects of the request situations, may serve as an excellent starting point for those who wish to get acquainted with socio-linguistic difference between East Asian cultures.”
Ann Kronrod, Tel-Aviv University, on Linguist List, Vol. 19-2304
Cited by
Cited by 15 other publications
Al-Shawesh, Marwan Yahya & Supyan Hussin
2015. Investigating the Request Strategies Among the Arab International Students and Malaysian Employees at a University in Malaysia.
SSRN Electronic Journal 
Ali, Ziyad & Helen Woodfield
2017.
In Current Issues in Intercultural Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 274],
► pp. 297 ff.
Baker, Olja
2021. Parliamentary directives in New Zealand and Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Languages in Contrast 21:1 ► pp. 28 ff.
Chan, Angela, Wei Zhang, Olga Zayts, Mary Hoi Yin Tang & Wai Keung Tam
2015. Directive-giving and grammatical forms.
Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 6:2 ► pp. 133 ff.
Li, Shuai
2019.
In Current Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 10],
► pp. 57 ff.
Mulo Farenkia, Bernard
2020.
In Heritage,
Nguyen, Thi Thuy Minh & Gia Anh Le Ho
2013. Requests and politeness in Vietnamese as a native language.
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 23:4 ► pp. 685 ff.
Parvaresh, Vahid
2018. ‘We Are Going to Do a Lot of Things for College Tuition’: Vague Language in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Debates.
Corpus Pragmatics 2:2 ► pp. 167 ff.
Rossi, Giovanni
2012. Bilateral and Unilateral Requests: The Use of Imperatives andMi X?Interrogatives in Italian.
Discourse Processes 49:5 ► pp. 426 ff.
Rossi, Giovanni
2014.
In Requesting in Social Interaction [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 26],
► pp. 303 ff.
Sabet, Peyman G. P., Samran Daneshfar & Grace Zhang
2021. Elastic language in academic emails: Communication between a PhD applicant and potential supervisors.
Australian Journal of Linguistics ► pp. 1 ff.
Szczepaniak-Kozak, Anna
2016.
In Classroom-Oriented Research [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ],
► pp. 197 ff.
Szczepaniak-Kozak, Anna, Ewa Bakinowska & Katerina Strani
2020. Measuring change in longitudinal research on pragmatic competence: A multinomial logistic model.
Biometrical Letters 57:2 ► pp. 195 ff.
Van Olmen, Daniël & Simone Heinold
2017.
In Imperatives and Directive Strategies [Studies in Language Companion Series, 184],
Zhang, Grace
2016. How elastic a little can be and how much a little can do in Chinese.
Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 7:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects & Metadata
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General