On Apologising in Negative and Positive Politeness Cultures

Author

Eva Ogiermann | University of Portsmouth

Hardbound – Available

ISBN 9789027254351 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00

e-Book –

ISBN 9789027288899 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00

This book investigates how speakers of English, Polish and Russian deal with offensive situations. It reveals culture-specific perceptions of what counts as an apology and what constitutes politeness. It offers a critical discussion of Brown and Levinson's theory and provides counterevidence to the correlation between indirectness and politeness underlying their theory. Their theory is applied to two languages that rely less heavily on indirectness in conveying politeness than does English, and to a speech act that does not become more polite through indirectness. An analysis of the face considerations involved in apologising shows that in contrast to disarming apologies, remedial apologies are mainly directed towards positive face needs, which are crucial for the restoration of social equilibrium and maintenance of relationships. The data show that while English apologies are characterised by a relatively strong focus on both interlocutors’ negative face, Polish apologies display a particular concern for positive face. For Russian speakers, in contrast, apologies seem to involve a lower degree of face threat than they do in the other two languages.

[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 191] 2009. x, 296 pp.

Publishing status: Available

https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.191

Table of Contents

Abbreviations, figures, tables | pp. ix–x

Preface | pp. 1–6

Chapter 1. Cross-cultural pragmatics | pp. 7–22

Chapter 2. The culture-specificity of politeness | pp. 23–44

Chapter 3. The speech act of apologising | pp. 45–60

Chapter 4. Literature review | pp. 61–66

Chapter 5. Methodological considerations | pp. 67–80

Chapter 6. Data collection | pp. 81–92

Chapter 7. Illocutionary Force Indicating Devices: IFIDs | pp. 93–130

Chapter 8. Accounts | pp. 131–178

Chapter 9. Positive politeness apology strategies | pp. 179–204

Chapter 10. On the culture-specificity of apologies | pp. 205–258

Chapter 11. Conclusion | pp. 259–268

Appendices | pp. 269–274

Notes | pp. 275–278

Index | pp. 295–296

“The book as a whole provides a theoretically-motivated and thorough comparison of the speech act of apologizing in English, Polish, and Russian. It makes an important contribution both to knowledge about apologies in these specific languages, as well as to theoretical debates in cross-cultural pragmatics. Incorporation of insights from the field of intercultural communication, discussion of the cultural values that inform speech act behavior, and qualitative analysis of apology realization are some clear strengths of the volume.”

Rachel L. Shively, Illinois State University, Multilingua V.30 (2011)

“Ogiermann’s work is brilliant. [...] In addition to the solid theoretical foundation on which the study is based, the meticulously conducted study resulted in a large corpus of data from all three languages. [...] This work, then, is a valuable contribution to the interrelated fields of pragmatics, cross-cultural pragmatics, and linguistic politeness. The rich data and detailed analysis in two understudied languages provide important baseline data for future studies. In addition to being a must-read for any researcher in the above-listed specializations, it will serve as an excellent introduction to pragmatic theory for graduate students getting started in the field.”

Lisa Dewaard Dykstra, Clemson University, in The Modern Language Journal 95 (2011)

“The book is a serious contribution to cross-linguistic studies in a variety of aspects. The author succeeds in reviving Brown and Levinson’s theory by attempting to apply it for the analysis of politeness strategies in languages which seem to disprove its underlying principles. Ogiermann’s study is both insightful and illuminating, offering those interested in cross-cultural pragmatics impressive material on two Slavic languages which have not been given sufficient linguistic attention in what Eastern European pragmatists call ‘Western’ linguistics. And most importantly, it proves that contrary to what is generally believed by Anglo-Saxon linguistics (including Brown and Levinson’s theory) which views apologies as negative face strategies, Ogiermann’s study offers ample evidence for the central role of positive face in the performance of remedial apologies, a finding which yet again attempts to break away from the ethnocentric character of cross-linguistic research. For that reason alone, the book is a valuable and long-awaited contribution to the discussion on politeness strategies across languages.”

Witoslaw Awedyk, Quotee Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland.

“This book has merits for varied audiences of different levels of expertise in linguistics and culture studies. [...] Ogiermann’s research is evidently clearly defined and well documented, with her quantitative data meticulously analysed. [...] Eva Ogiermann’s book is a relevant must-read, which offers seminal claims and boosts motivation for further investigations.”

Iwona Witczak-Plisiecka, University of Lodz, in Journal of Pragmatics, Issue 44(2012), pages 529-531

Cited by

Cited by 88 other publications

Order by:

Ahangar, Abbas Ali & Seddigheh Zeynali Dastuyi

2018. Apology Speech Act Realization in the Sarawani Balochi Dialect: A Case Study of Female University Students. Studia Linguistica 72:1 ► pp. 39 ff.

An, Yi, Hang Su & Mingyou Xiang

2022. Apology responses and gender differences in spoken British English. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 32:1 ► pp. 28 ff.

Baider, Fabienne H., Georgeta Cislaru & Chantal Claudel

2020. Researching Politeness: From the ‘Classical’ Approach to Discourse Analysis … and Back. Corpus Pragmatics 4:3 ► pp. 259 ff.

Banasik-Jemielniak, Natalia & Barbara Bokus

2019. Children’s Comprehension of Irony: Studies on Polish-Speaking Preschoolers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 48:5 ► pp. 1217 ff.

Banasik-Jemielniak, Natalia, Sandra Bosacki, Anna Mitrowska, Diana Wyrębek Walters, Katarzyna Wisiecka, Natalia Ewelina Copeland, Lara Wieland, Ljiljana Popovic, Jovana Piper, Aleksandra Siemieniuk & Valerio Capraro

2020. “Wonderful! We’ve just missed the bus.” – Parental use of irony and children’s irony comprehension. PLOS ONE 15:2 ► pp. e0228538 ff.

Barron, Anne

2021. Synchronic and Diachronic Pragmatic Variability. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 182 ff.

Bartali, Valentina

2022. Request realisation strategies in Italian: The influence of the variables of Distance and Weight of Imposition on strategy choice. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 18:1 ► pp. 55 ff.

Bella, Spyridoula

2022. A contrastive study of apologies performed by Greek native speakers and English learners of Greek as a foreign language. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 679 ff.

Bentley, Joshua M.

2012. Not the Best: What Rush Limbaugh's Apology to Sandra Fluke Reveals about Image Restoration Strategies on Commercial Radio. Journal of Radio & Audio Media 19:2 ► pp. 221 ff.

Cerulo, Karen A. & Janet M. Ruane

2014. Apologies of the Rich and Famous. Social Psychology Quarterly 77:2 ► pp. 123 ff.

Chejnová, Pavla

2022. Self-Praise in Czech Television Talk Shows. In Self-Praise Across Cultures and Contexts [Advances in (Im)politeness Studies, ], ► pp. 293 ff.

Constantinescu, Mihaela-Viorica

2018. A perspective on “impoliteness” in early modern Romanian court and diplomatic interactions. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 19:1 ► pp. 92 ff.

Degenhardt, Julia & Tobias Bernaisch

2022. Apologies in South Asian Varieties of English: A Corpus-Based Study on Indian and Sri Lankan English. Corpus Pragmatics 6:3 ► pp. 201 ff.

Denoyelle, Corinne

2021. La réalisation de l’excuse en moyen français : une recherche en pragmatique historique. Travaux de linguistique n° 81:2 ► pp. 145 ff.

Diani, Giuliana

2014. Politeness. In Corpus Pragmatics, ► pp. 169 ff.

Dębowska-Kozłowska, Kamila & Dale Hample

2022. “Agreement Builds and Disagreement Destroys:” How Polish Undergraduates and Graduates Understand Interpersonal Arguing. Argumentation 36:3 ► pp. 365 ff.

El-Dakhs, Dina Abdel Salam

2018. Investigating the apology strategies of Saudi learners of English. Pragmatics and Society 9:4 ► pp. 598 ff.

El-Dakhs, Dina Abdel Salam & Nermine Galal Ibrahim

2023. The realization of the speech acts of complaint and responding to complaint in Vodafone Egypt versus Vodafone UK. Language and Dialogue 13:3 ► pp. 336 ff.

Farnia, Maryam & Hiba Qusay Abdul Sattar

2015. A Cross-Cultural Study of Iranians’ and Malays’ Expressions of Gratitude. Journal of Intercultural Communication 15:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Farnia, Maryam & Elham Yazdani

2018. Politeness Strategies in Remindings A Cross-cultural Study of Iranian EFL learners and Americans. Journal of Intercultural Communication 18:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Fernández-García, Francisco

2024. ¿Acercamiento solidario vs. distanciamiento respetuoso?. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 37:1 ► pp. 233 ff.

Gauci, Phyllisienne, Elisa Ghia & Sandro Caruana

2017. Chapter 14. The pragmatic competence of student-teachers of Italian L2. In Current Issues in Intercultural Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 274], ► pp. 323 ff.

Gawlik-Kobylińska, Małgorzata

2020. Self-reported communicative distance between Polish and English in formal and informal situational contexts. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 56:4 ► pp. 605 ff.

Ghanggo Ate, Yustinus & Charbel El-Khaissi

2023. Apologizing in Kodhi. Australian Journal of Linguistics 43:3 ► pp. 258 ff.

Harrington, Kieran

2023. Culture in English Language Teaching: Let the Language Do the Talking. In Demystifying Corpus Linguistics for English Language Teaching, ► pp. 163 ff.

Hatipoglu, Ciler

2016. Explicit apologies in L2 Turkish. In Second Language Acquisition of Turkish [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 59], ► pp. 221 ff.

Haugh, Michael & Jonathan Culpeper

2018. Integrative pragmatics and (im)politeness theory. In Pragmatics and its Interfaces [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 294], ► pp. 213 ff.

Hopkinson, Christopher

2017. APOLOGIES IN L1 AND LINGUA FRANCA ENGLISH: A CONTRASTIVE PRAGMATIC STUDY OF TRIPADVISOR RESPONSES. Discourse and Interaction 10:1 ► pp. 49 ff.

Hopkinson, Christopher

2018. Chapter 8. Saving face online. In Persuasion in Public Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 79], ► pp. 181 ff.

House, Juliane & Dániel Z. Kádár

2023. Cross‐Cultural Pragmatics. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff.

Ilyinova, E. Yu., O. S. Volkova & V. A. Litvinova

2021. Discursive Strategies of Indirect Apology in English-Language Personal Communication. Discourse 7:4 ► pp. 131 ff.

Jalali, Sara & Seyyed Hatam Tamimi Sa'd

2013. Culture in ELT: A probe into Iranian EFL teachers' perspectives. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning 3:3

Jansegers, Marlies, Chantal Melis & Jennie Elenor Arrington Báez

2023. Diverging Grammaticalization Patterns across Spanish Varieties: The Case of perdón in Mexican and Peninsular Spanish. Languages 9:1 ► pp. 13 ff.

Katinaitė, Donata & Inga Hilbig

2021. Lithuanian Refusals and Politeness. Respectus Philologicus :39 (44)

Kusevska, Marija, Biljana Ivanovska, Nina Daskalovska & Tatjana Ulanska

2016. Profiling Pragmatic Competence of Foreign Language Learners. Romanian Journal of English Studies 13:1 ► pp. 79 ff.

Lach Mirghani, Katarzyna

2022. Thank you, sorry and please: English politeness markers in Polish. Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies :38(3) ► pp. 98 ff.

Limberg, Holger

2016. Teaching how to apologize: EFL textbooks and pragmatic input. Language Teaching Research 20:6 ► pp. 700 ff.

Lin, Ming-Fang, Miao-Hsia Chang & Yu-Fang Wang

2021. “How Dare You Have Another Relationship!”: An analysis of cross-cultural and interlanguage corrections . International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 59:4 ► pp. 449 ff.

Liu, Jianda & Wei Ren

2016. Apologies in Emails: Interactions Between Chinese EFL Learners and Their Foreign Peers. In Email Discourse Among Chinese Using English as a Lingua Franca, ► pp. 205 ff.

Locher, Miriam A. & Martin Luginbühl

2019. Discussions on Swiss and German Politeness in Online Sources. In From Speech Acts to Lay Understandings of Politeness, ► pp. 250 ff.

Lu, Xinyi

2022. The pragmatic strategies of apology in WeChat communication. BCP Social Sciences & Humanities 17 ► pp. 93 ff.

Lutzky, Ursula & Andrew Kehoe

2017. “I apologise for my poor blogging”: Searching for Apologies in the Birmingham Blog Corpus. Corpus Pragmatics 1:1 ► pp. 37 ff.

Margerie, Hélène & Philippe Muller

2019. Excuse me vs. (I’m) sorry as two contrasting markers of interlocutive relations. Corela :17-2

Martínez García, Carlos & Gonzalo Resa Heras

2022. El enunciado lo siento como disculpa: análisis diacrónico. Dicenda. Estudios de lengua y literatura españolas 40 ► pp. 85 ff.

McConachy, Troy & Helen Spencer-Oatey

2021. Cross-Cultural and Intercultural Pragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 733 ff.

Mohammadi, Mohammad & Seyyed Hatam Tamimi Sa'd

2013. Native speakers' assessment of (im)politeness of non-native speakers' requests. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning 3:4

Murphy, James

2015. Revisiting the apology as a speech act. Journal of Language and Politics 14:2 ► pp. 175 ff.

Murphy, James

2019. Apologising. In The Discursive Construction of Blame, ► pp. 201 ff.

Navera, Jocelyn A. S. & Leah Gustilo

2022. Knowledge types and presuppositions. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 32:2 ► pp. 274 ff.

Ogiermann, Eva

2015. Apology Discourse. In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, ► pp. 1 ff.

Ogiermann, Eva & Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich

2019. Im/politeness between the Analyst and Participant Perspectives: An Overview of the Field. In From Speech Acts to Lay Understandings of Politeness, ► pp. 1 ff.

Ogiermann, Eva & Małgorzata Suszczyńska

2011. On Im/politeness Behind the Iron Curtain. In Politeness Across Cultures, ► pp. 194 ff.

Orsini-Jones, Marina & Fiona Lee

2018. Conclusion. In Intercultural Communicative Competence for Global Citizenship, ► pp. 93 ff.

Orsini-Jones, Marina & Fiona Lee

2018. Emerging Online Politeness Patterns. In Intercultural Communicative Competence for Global Citizenship, ► pp. 63 ff.

Orsini-Jones, Marina & Fiona Lee

2018. CoCo Research Questions and Answers. In Intercultural Communicative Competence for Global Citizenship, ► pp. 53 ff.

Orthaber, Sara

2023. On (Im)politeness. In (Im)politeness at a Slovenian Call Centre [Advances in (Im)politeness Studies, ], ► pp. 11 ff.

Orthaber, Sara

2023. Routine Calls for Information and Request Emails. In (Im)politeness at a Slovenian Call Centre [Advances in (Im)politeness Studies, ], ► pp. 97 ff.

Rieger, Caroline L.

2022. “I want a real apology”. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 553 ff.

Rudneva, Ekaterina

2019. How Russians pre-request and seek assistance: a study of interaction in two communities of practice. Russian Linguistics 43:2 ► pp. 127 ff.

Salam El-Dakhs, Dina Abdel , Mervat M. Ahmed, Jawaher Nasser AlHaqbani & Afrah Alenezi

2023. How do Alexandrians and Najdis Apologize? A Variational Pragmatic Study of Arabic. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies ► pp. 147 ff.

Santamaría-García, Carmen

2018. Connected Learners. In Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Technology-Enhanced Language Learning [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ], ► pp. 83 ff.

Sarfo-Kantankah, Kwabena Sarfo

2021. I withdraw and apologise but…: Ghanaian parliamentary apologies, the issue of sincerity and acceptance. Journal of Pragmatics 180 ► pp. 1 ff.

Sifianou, Maria & Spiridoula Bella

2019. Twitter, Politeness, Self-Presentation. In Analyzing Digital Discourse, ► pp. 341 ff.

Sifianou, Maria & Garcés-Conejos Blitvich

2017. (Im)politeness and Cultural Variation. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ► pp. 571 ff.

Silec-Plessis, Tatjana

2020. Ipomedon and the elusive nature of blunders in the courtly literature of medieval England. In Manners, Norms and Transgressions in the History of English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 312], ► pp. 26 ff.

Su, Hang & Xiaofei Lu

2023. Local grammars and intercultural speech act studies: A study of apologies in four English varieties. Intercultural Pragmatics 20:4 ► pp. 377 ff.

Szczepaniak-Kozak, Anna

2016. Interlanguage Pragmatics of EFL Advanced Learners: Insights from a Longitudinal Study into the Development of the Speech Act of Request in the Polish Context. In Classroom-Oriented Research [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 197 ff.

Szczepaniak-Kozak, Anna

2021. Pragmatic accent: Sociolinguistic and pragmalinguistic examples. In Angewandte Linguistik – Neue Herausforderungen und Konzepte, ► pp. 57 ff.

Tajeddin, Zia, Minoo Alemi & Sajedeh Razzaghi

2014. Cross-cultural Perceptions of Impoliteness by Native English Speakers and EFL Learners: The Case of Apology Speech Act. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research 43:4 ► pp. 304 ff.

Tamimi Sa'd, Seyyed Hatam & Mohammad Mohammadi

2014. A cross-sectional study of request perspective use among Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning 3:5

Taylor, Charlotte

2016. Mock politeness and culture: Perceptions and practice in UK and Italian data. Intercultural Pragmatics 13:4 ► pp. 463 ff.

Tereszkiewicz, Anna

2019. Responding to customer complaints on English and Polish corporate profiles on Twitter. Pragmatics and Society 10:2 ► pp. 205 ff.

Tereszkiewicz, Anna

2021. Rejecting consumer complaints in customer encounters on Twitter - the case of English and Polish brand communication. Journal of Politeness Research 17:2 ► pp. 189 ff.

Thaler, Marion & Christine Elsweiler

2023. The Role of Gender in the Realisation of Apologies in Local Council Meetings: A Variational Pragmatic Approach in British and New Zealand English. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 71:3 ► pp. 217 ff.

Thielemann, Nadine, Regina Göke & Zlatoslava Savych

2021. Motzen und Moral. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 66:1 ► pp. 140 ff.

Unceta Gómez, Luis

2014. Pedir perdón en latín. El acto de habla de la disculpa en las obras de Plauto y Terencio. Emerita 82:1 ► pp. 69 ff.

Vuković, Milica & Vesna Bratić

2015. Balkan War of Apologies. Journal of Language and Politics 14:4 ► pp. 552 ff.

Wang, Qian, Cindy Sing-Bik Ngai & Rita Gill Singh

2021. A Discursive Analysis of Crisis Response Strategies in CEO Apologies—Drawing on Linguistic Insights from the Appraisal Framework. Management Communication Quarterly 35:4 ► pp. 602 ff.

Xiang, Mingyou, Mian Jia & Xiaohui Bu

2024. Speech Acts. In Introduction to Pragmatics [Peking University Linguistics Research, 9], ► pp. 75 ff.

Yang, Na & Jiabei Hu

2023. Getting involved or acting in defence. Pragmatics and Society 14:3 ► pp. 410 ff.

Zlov, Vladislav & Jordan Zlatev

2023. A cognitive-semiotic approach to impoliteness: Effects of conventionality and semiotic system on judgements of impoliteness by Russian and Swedish speakers. Journal of Politeness Research 0:0

[no author supplied]

2010. Publications Received. Language in Society 39:4 ► pp. 587 ff.

[no author supplied]

2011. PUBLICATIONS RECEIVED. Language in Society 40:1 ► pp. 135 ff.

[no author supplied]

2016. Mock Politeness in English and Italian [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 267],

[no author supplied]

2019. Argumentation Mining [Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies, ],

[no author supplied]

2020. Understanding Conversational Joking [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 310],

[no author supplied]

2021. Fundamentals of Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 13 ff.

[no author supplied]

2021. Approaches and Methods in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 567 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects