On Apologising in Negative and Positive Politeness Cultures
Author
This book investigates how speakers of English, Polish and Russian deal with offensive situations. It reveals culture-specific perceptions of what counts as an apology and what constitutes politeness. It offers a critical discussion of Brown and Levinson's theory and provides counterevidence to the correlation between indirectness and politeness underlying their theory. Their theory is applied to two languages that rely less heavily on indirectness in conveying politeness than does English, and to a speech act that does not become more polite through indirectness. An analysis of the face considerations involved in apologising shows that in contrast to disarming apologies, remedial apologies are mainly directed towards positive face needs, which are crucial for the restoration of social equilibrium and maintenance of relationships. The data show that while English apologies are characterised by a relatively strong focus on both interlocutors’ negative face, Polish apologies display a particular concern for positive face. For Russian speakers, in contrast, apologies seem to involve a lower degree of face threat than they do in the other two languages.
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 191] 2009. x, 296 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Abbreviations, figures, tables | pp. ix–x
-
Preface | pp. 1–6
-
Chapter 1. Cross-cultural pragmatics | pp. 7–22
-
Chapter 2. The culture-specificity of politeness | pp. 23–44
-
Chapter 3. The speech act of apologising | pp. 45–60
-
Chapter 4. Literature review | pp. 61–66
-
Chapter 5. Methodological considerations | pp. 67–80
-
Chapter 6. Data collection | pp. 81–92
-
Chapter 7. Illocutionary Force Indicating Devices: IFIDs | pp. 93–130
-
Chapter 8. Accounts | pp. 131–178
-
Chapter 9. Positive politeness apology strategies | pp. 179–204
-
Chapter 10. On the culture-specificity of apologies | pp. 205–258
-
Chapter 11. Conclusion | pp. 259–268
-
Appendices | pp. 269–274
-
Notes | pp. 275–278
-
-
Index | pp. 295–296
“The book as a whole provides a theoretically-motivated and thorough comparison of the speech act of apologizing in English, Polish, and Russian. It makes an important contribution both to knowledge about apologies in these specific languages, as well as to theoretical debates in cross-cultural pragmatics. Incorporation of insights from the field of intercultural communication, discussion of the cultural values that inform speech act behavior, and qualitative analysis of apology realization are some clear strengths of the volume.”
Rachel L. Shively, Illinois State University, Multilingua V.30 (2011)
“Ogiermann’s work is brilliant. [...] In addition to the solid theoretical foundation on which the study is based, the meticulously conducted study resulted in a large corpus of data from all three languages. [...] This work, then, is a valuable contribution to the interrelated fields of pragmatics, cross-cultural pragmatics, and linguistic politeness. The rich data and detailed analysis in two understudied languages provide important baseline data for future studies. In addition to being a must-read for any researcher in the above-listed specializations, it will serve as an excellent introduction to pragmatic theory for graduate students getting started in the field.”
Lisa Dewaard Dykstra, Clemson University, in The Modern Language Journal 95 (2011)
“The book is a serious contribution to cross-linguistic studies in a variety of aspects. The author succeeds in reviving Brown and Levinson’s theory by attempting to apply it for the analysis of politeness strategies in languages which seem to disprove its underlying principles. Ogiermann’s study is both insightful and illuminating, offering those interested in cross-cultural pragmatics impressive material on two Slavic languages which have not been given sufficient linguistic attention in what Eastern European pragmatists call ‘Western’ linguistics. And most importantly, it proves that contrary to what is generally believed by Anglo-Saxon linguistics (including Brown and Levinson’s theory) which views apologies as negative face strategies, Ogiermann’s study offers ample evidence for the central role of positive face in the performance of remedial apologies, a finding which yet again attempts to break away from the ethnocentric character of cross-linguistic research. For that reason alone, the book is a valuable and long-awaited contribution to the discussion on politeness strategies across languages.”
Witoslaw Awedyk, Quotee Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland.
“This book has merits for varied audiences of different levels of expertise in linguistics and culture studies. [...] Ogiermann’s research is evidently clearly defined and well documented, with her quantitative data meticulously analysed. [...] Eva Ogiermann’s book is a relevant must-read, which offers seminal claims and boosts motivation for further investigations.”
Iwona Witczak-Plisiecka, University of Lodz, in Journal of Pragmatics, Issue 44(2012), pages 529-531
Cited by
Cited by 74 other publications
Martínez García, Carlos & Gonzalo Resa Heras
Ahangar, Abbas Ali & Seddigheh Zeynali Dastuyi
An, Yi, Hang Su & Mingyou Xiang
2022. Apology responses and gender differences in spoken British English. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 32:1 ► pp. 28 ff. 
Baider, Fabienne H., Georgeta Cislaru & Chantal Claudel
Banasik-Jemielniak, Natalia & Barbara Bokus
Banasik-Jemielniak, Natalia, Sandra Bosacki, Anna Mitrowska, Diana Wyrębek Walters, Katarzyna Wisiecka, Natalia Ewelina Copeland, Lara Wieland, Ljiljana Popovic, Jovana Piper, Aleksandra Siemieniuk & Valerio Capraro
Barron, Anne
Bartali, Valentina
Bella, Spyridoula
2022. A contrastive study of apologies performed by Greek native speakers and English learners of Greek as a foreign language. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 679 ff. 
Bentley, Joshua M.
Cerulo, Karen A. & Janet M. Ruane
Chejnová, Pavla
Constantinescu, Mihaela-Viorica
2018. A perspective on “impoliteness” in early modern Romanian court and diplomatic interactions. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 19:1 ► pp. 92 ff. 
Degenhardt, Julia & Tobias Bernaisch
Dębowska-Kozłowska, Kamila & Dale Hample
El-Dakhs, Dina Abdel Salam
2018. Investigating the apology strategies of Saudi learners of English. Pragmatics and Society 9:4 ► pp. 598 ff. 
Gauci, Phyllisienne, Elisa Ghia & Sandro Caruana
2017. Chapter 14. The pragmatic competence of student-teachers of Italian L2. In Current Issues in Intercultural Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 274], ► pp. 323 ff. 
Gawlik-Kobylińska, Małgorzata
Harrington, Kieran
Hatipoglu, Ciler
2016. Explicit apologies in L2 Turkish. In Second Language Acquisition of Turkish [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 59], ► pp. 221 ff. 
Haugh, Michael & Jonathan Culpeper
2018. Integrative pragmatics and (im)politeness theory. In Pragmatics and its Interfaces [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 294], ► pp. 213 ff. 
Hopkinson, Christopher
Hopkinson, Christopher
2018. Chapter 8. Saving face online. In Persuasion in Public Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 79], ► pp. 181 ff. 
House, Juliane & Dániel Z. Kádár
Ilyinova, E. Yu., O. S. Volkova & V. A. Litvinova
Jalali, Sara & Seyyed Hatam Tamimi Sa'd
Katinaitė, Donata & Inga Hilbig
Kusevska, Marija, Biljana Ivanovska, Nina Daskalovska & Tatjana Ulanska
Limberg, Holger
Lin, Ming-Fang, Miao-Hsia Chang & Yu-Fang Wang
Liu, Jianda & Wei Ren
Locher, Miriam A. & Martin Luginbühl
Lu, Xinyi
Lutzky, Ursula & Andrew Kehoe
Margerie, Hélène & Philippe Muller
McConachy, Troy & Helen Spencer-Oatey
Mohammadi, Mohammad & Seyyed Hatam Tamimi Sa'd
Murphy, James
Navera, Jocelyn A. S. & Leah Gustilo
2022. Knowledge types and presuppositions. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 32:2 ► pp. 274 ff. 
Ogiermann, Eva
Ogiermann, Eva & Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
Ogiermann, Eva & Małgorzata Suszczyńska
Orsini-Jones, Marina & Fiona Lee
Orsini-Jones, Marina & Fiona Lee
Orsini-Jones, Marina & Fiona Lee
Rieger, Caroline L.
2022. “I want a real apology”. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 553 ff. 
Rudneva, Ekaterina
Santamaría-García, Carmen
Sarfo-Kantankah, Kwabena Sarfo
Sifianou, Maria & Spiridoula Bella
Sifianou, Maria & Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
Silec-Plessis, Tatjana
2020. Ipomedon and the elusive nature of blunders in the courtly literature of medieval England. In Manners, Norms and Transgressions in the History of English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 312], ► pp. 26 ff. 
Szczepaniak-Kozak, Anna
Szczepaniak-Kozak, Anna
Tajeddin, Zia, Minoo Alemi & Sajedeh Razzaghi
Tamimi Sa'd, Seyyed Hatam & Mohammad Mohammadi
Taylor, Charlotte
Tereszkiewicz, Anna
2019. Responding to customer complaints on English and Polish corporate
profiles on Twitter. Pragmatics and Society 10:2 ► pp. 205 ff. 
Tereszkiewicz, Anna
Thielemann, Nadine, Regina Göke & Zlatoslava Savych
Unceta Gómez, Luis
Vuković, Milica & Vesna Bratić
Wang, Qian, Cindy Sing-Bik Ngai & Rita Gill Singh
Weizman, Elda
Yang, Na & Jiabei Hu
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CFG: Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General