On Apologising in Negative and Positive Politeness Cultures
Author
This book investigates how speakers of English, Polish and Russian deal with offensive situations. It reveals culture-specific perceptions of what counts as an apology and what constitutes politeness. It offers a critical discussion of Brown and Levinson's theory and provides counterevidence to the correlation between indirectness and politeness underlying their theory. Their theory is applied to two languages that rely less heavily on indirectness in conveying politeness than does English, and to a speech act that does not become more polite through indirectness. An analysis of the face considerations involved in apologising shows that in contrast to disarming apologies, remedial apologies are mainly directed towards positive face needs, which are crucial for the restoration of social equilibrium and maintenance of relationships. The data show that while English apologies are characterised by a relatively strong focus on both interlocutors’ negative face, Polish apologies display a particular concern for positive face. For Russian speakers, in contrast, apologies seem to involve a lower degree of face threat than they do in the other two languages.
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 191] 2009. x, 296 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Abbreviations, figures, tables | pp. ix–x
-
Preface | pp. 1–6
-
Chapter 1. Cross-cultural pragmatics | pp. 7–22
-
Chapter 2. The culture-specificity of politeness | pp. 23–44
-
Chapter 3. The speech act of apologising | pp. 45–60
-
Chapter 4. Literature review | pp. 61–66
-
Chapter 5. Methodological considerations | pp. 67–80
-
Chapter 6. Data collection | pp. 81–92
-
Chapter 7. Illocutionary Force Indicating Devices: IFIDs | pp. 93–130
-
Chapter 8. Accounts | pp. 131–178
-
Chapter 9. Positive politeness apology strategies | pp. 179–204
-
Chapter 10. On the culture-specificity of apologies | pp. 205–258
-
Chapter 11. Conclusion | pp. 259–268
-
Appendices | pp. 269–274
-
Notes | pp. 275–278
-
-
Index | pp. 295–296
“The book as a whole provides a theoretically-motivated and thorough comparison of the speech act of apologizing in English, Polish, and Russian. It makes an important contribution both to knowledge about apologies in these specific languages, as well as to theoretical debates in cross-cultural pragmatics. Incorporation of insights from the field of intercultural communication, discussion of the cultural values that inform speech act behavior, and qualitative analysis of apology realization are some clear strengths of the volume.”
Rachel L. Shively, Illinois State University, Multilingua V.30 (2011)
“Ogiermann’s work is brilliant. [...] In addition to the solid theoretical foundation on which the study is based, the meticulously conducted study resulted in a large corpus of data from all three languages. [...] This work, then, is a valuable contribution to the interrelated fields of pragmatics, cross-cultural pragmatics, and linguistic politeness. The rich data and detailed analysis in two understudied languages provide important baseline data for future studies. In addition to being a must-read for any researcher in the above-listed specializations, it will serve as an excellent introduction to pragmatic theory for graduate students getting started in the field.”
Lisa Dewaard Dykstra, Clemson University, in The Modern Language Journal 95 (2011)
“The book is a serious contribution to cross-linguistic studies in a variety of aspects. The author succeeds in reviving Brown and Levinson’s theory by attempting to apply it for the analysis of politeness strategies in languages which seem to disprove its underlying principles. Ogiermann’s study is both insightful and illuminating, offering those interested in cross-cultural pragmatics impressive material on two Slavic languages which have not been given sufficient linguistic attention in what Eastern European pragmatists call ‘Western’ linguistics. And most importantly, it proves that contrary to what is generally believed by Anglo-Saxon linguistics (including Brown and Levinson’s theory) which views apologies as negative face strategies, Ogiermann’s study offers ample evidence for the central role of positive face in the performance of remedial apologies, a finding which yet again attempts to break away from the ethnocentric character of cross-linguistic research. For that reason alone, the book is a valuable and long-awaited contribution to the discussion on politeness strategies across languages.”
Witoslaw Awedyk, Quotee Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland.
“This book has merits for varied audiences of different levels of expertise in linguistics and culture studies. [...] Ogiermann’s research is evidently clearly defined and well documented, with her quantitative data meticulously analysed. [...] Eva Ogiermann’s book is a relevant must-read, which offers seminal claims and boosts motivation for further investigations.”
Iwona Witczak-Plisiecka, University of Lodz, in Journal of Pragmatics, Issue 44(2012), pages 529-531
Cited by
Cited by 74 other publications
Martínez García, Carlos & Gonzalo Resa Heras
2022. El enunciado lo siento como disculpa: análisis diacrónico. Dicenda. Estudios de lengua y literatura españolas 40 ► pp. 85 ff. 
Ahangar, Abbas Ali & Seddigheh Zeynali Dastuyi
2018. Apology Speech Act Realization in the Sarawani Balochi Dialect: A Case Study of Female University Students. Studia Linguistica 72:1 ► pp. 39 ff.
An, Yi, Hang Su & Mingyou Xiang
2022. Apology responses and gender differences in spoken British English. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 32:1 ► pp. 28 ff.
Baider, Fabienne H., Georgeta Cislaru & Chantal Claudel
2020. Researching Politeness: From the ‘Classical’ Approach to Discourse Analysis … and Back. Corpus Pragmatics 4:3 ► pp. 259 ff.
Banasik-Jemielniak, Natalia & Barbara Bokus
2019. Children’s Comprehension of Irony: Studies on Polish-Speaking Preschoolers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 48:5 ► pp. 1217 ff.
Banasik-Jemielniak, Natalia, Sandra Bosacki, Anna Mitrowska, Diana Wyrębek Walters, Katarzyna Wisiecka, Natalia Ewelina Copeland, Lara Wieland, Ljiljana Popovic, Jovana Piper, Aleksandra Siemieniuk & Valerio Capraro
2020. “Wonderful! We’ve just missed the bus.” – Parental use of irony and children’s irony comprehension. PLOS ONE 15:2 ► pp. e0228538 ff.
Barron, Anne
2021. Synchronic and Diachronic Pragmatic Variability. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 182 ff.
Bartali, Valentina
2022. Request realisation strategies in Italian: The influence of the variables of Distance and Weight of Imposition on strategy choice. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 18:1 ► pp. 55 ff.
Bella, Spyridoula
2022. A contrastive study of apologies performed by Greek native speakers and English learners of Greek as a foreign language. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 679 ff.
Bentley, Joshua M.
2012. Not the Best: What Rush Limbaugh's Apology to Sandra Fluke Reveals about Image Restoration Strategies on Commercial Radio. Journal of Radio & Audio Media 19:2 ► pp. 221 ff.
Cerulo, Karen A. & Janet M. Ruane
2014. Apologies of the Rich and Famous. Social Psychology Quarterly 77:2 ► pp. 123 ff.
Chejnová, Pavla
2022. Self-Praise in Czech Television Talk Shows. In Self-Praise Across Cultures and Contexts [Advances in (Im)politeness Studies, ], ► pp. 293 ff.
Constantinescu, Mihaela-Viorica
2018. A perspective on “impoliteness” in early modern Romanian court and diplomatic interactions. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 19:1 ► pp. 92 ff.
Degenhardt, Julia & Tobias Bernaisch
2022. Apologies in South Asian Varieties of English: A Corpus-Based Study on Indian and Sri Lankan English. Corpus Pragmatics 6:3 ► pp. 201 ff.
Diani, Giuliana
2014. Politeness. In Corpus Pragmatics, ► pp. 169 ff.
Dębowska-Kozłowska, Kamila & Dale Hample
2022. “Agreement Builds and Disagreement Destroys:” How Polish Undergraduates and Graduates Understand Interpersonal Arguing. Argumentation 36:3 ► pp. 365 ff.
El-Dakhs, Dina Abdel Salam
2018. Investigating the apology strategies of Saudi learners of English. Pragmatics and Society 9:4 ► pp. 598 ff.
Gauci, Phyllisienne, Elisa Ghia & Sandro Caruana
2017. Chapter 14. The pragmatic competence of student-teachers of Italian L2. In Current Issues in Intercultural Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 274], ► pp. 323 ff.
Gawlik-Kobylińska, Małgorzata
2020. Self-reported communicative distance between Polish and English in formal and informal situational contexts. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 56:4 ► pp. 605 ff.
Harrington, Kieran
2023. Culture in English Language Teaching: Let the Language Do the Talking. In Demystifying Corpus Linguistics for English Language Teaching, ► pp. 163 ff.
Hatipoglu, Ciler
2016. Explicit apologies in L2 Turkish. In Second Language Acquisition of Turkish [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 59], ► pp. 221 ff.
Haugh, Michael & Jonathan Culpeper
2018. Integrative pragmatics and (im)politeness theory. In Pragmatics and its Interfaces [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 294], ► pp. 213 ff.
Hopkinson, Christopher
2017. APOLOGIES IN L1 AND LINGUA FRANCA ENGLISH: A CONTRASTIVE PRAGMATIC STUDY OF TRIPADVISOR RESPONSES. Discourse and Interaction 10:1 ► pp. 49 ff.
Hopkinson, Christopher
2018. Chapter 8. Saving face online. In Persuasion in Public Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 79], ► pp. 181 ff.
House, Juliane & Dániel Z. Kádár
2023. Cross‐Cultural Pragmatics. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff.
Ilyinova, E. Yu., O. S. Volkova & V. A. Litvinova
2021. Discursive Strategies of Indirect Apology in English-Language Personal Communication. Discourse 7:4 ► pp. 131 ff.
Jalali, Sara & Seyyed Hatam Tamimi Sa'd
2013. Culture in ELT: A probe into Iranian EFL teachers' perspectives. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning 3:3
Katinaitė, Donata & Inga Hilbig
2021. Lithuanian Refusals and Politeness. Respectus Philologicus :39 (44)
Kusevska, Marija, Biljana Ivanovska, Nina Daskalovska & Tatjana Ulanska
2016. Profiling Pragmatic Competence of Foreign Language Learners. Romanian Journal of English Studies 13:1 ► pp. 79 ff.
Limberg, Holger
2016. Teaching how to apologize: EFL textbooks and pragmatic input. Language Teaching Research 20:6 ► pp. 700 ff.
Lin, Ming-Fang, Miao-Hsia Chang & Yu-Fang Wang
2021. “How Dare You Have Another Relationship!”: An analysis of cross-cultural and interlanguage corrections
. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 59:4 ► pp. 449 ff.
Liu, Jianda & Wei Ren
2016. Apologies in Emails: Interactions Between Chinese EFL Learners and Their Foreign Peers. In Email Discourse Among Chinese Using English as a Lingua Franca, ► pp. 205 ff.
Locher, Miriam A. & Martin Luginbühl
2019. Discussions on Swiss and German Politeness in Online Sources. In From Speech Acts to Lay Understandings of Politeness, ► pp. 250 ff.
Lu, Xinyi
2022. The pragmatic strategies of apology in WeChat communication. BCP Social Sciences & Humanities 17 ► pp. 93 ff.
Lutzky, Ursula & Andrew Kehoe
2017. “I apologise for my poor blogging”: Searching for Apologies in the Birmingham Blog Corpus. Corpus Pragmatics 1:1 ► pp. 37 ff.
Margerie, Hélène & Philippe Muller
2019. Excuse me vs. (I’m) sorry as two contrasting markers of interlocutive relations. Corela :17-2
McConachy, Troy & Helen Spencer-Oatey
2021. Cross-Cultural and Intercultural Pragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 733 ff.
Mohammadi, Mohammad & Seyyed Hatam Tamimi Sa'd
2013. Native speakers' assessment of (im)politeness of non-native speakers' requests. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning 3:4
Murphy, James
Murphy, James
2019. Apologising. In The Discursive Construction of Blame, ► pp. 201 ff.
Navera, Jocelyn A. S. & Leah Gustilo
2022. Knowledge types and presuppositions. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 32:2 ► pp. 274 ff.
Ogiermann, Eva
2015. Apology Discourse. In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, ► pp. 1 ff.
Ogiermann, Eva & Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2019. Im/politeness between the Analyst and Participant Perspectives: An Overview of the Field. In From Speech Acts to Lay Understandings of Politeness, ► pp. 1 ff.
Ogiermann, Eva & Małgorzata Suszczyńska
2011. On Im/politeness Behind the Iron Curtain. In Politeness Across Cultures, ► pp. 194 ff.
Orsini-Jones, Marina & Fiona Lee
2018. Conclusion. In Intercultural Communicative Competence for Global Citizenship, ► pp. 93 ff.
Orsini-Jones, Marina & Fiona Lee
2018. Emerging Online Politeness Patterns. In Intercultural Communicative Competence for Global Citizenship, ► pp. 63 ff.
Orsini-Jones, Marina & Fiona Lee
2018. CoCo Research Questions and Answers. In Intercultural Communicative Competence for Global Citizenship, ► pp. 53 ff.
Rieger, Caroline L.
2022. “I want a real apology”. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 553 ff.
Rudneva, Ekaterina
2019. How Russians pre-request and seek assistance: a study of interaction in two communities of practice. Russian Linguistics 43:2 ► pp. 127 ff.
Santamaría-García, Carmen
2018. Connected Learners. In Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Technology-Enhanced Language Learning [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ], ► pp. 83 ff.
Sarfo-Kantankah, Kwabena Sarfo
2021. I withdraw and apologise but…: Ghanaian parliamentary apologies, the issue of sincerity and acceptance. Journal of Pragmatics 180 ► pp. 1 ff.
Sifianou, Maria & Spiridoula Bella
2019. Twitter, Politeness, Self-Presentation. In Analyzing Digital Discourse, ► pp. 341 ff.
Sifianou, Maria & Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2017. (Im)politeness and Cultural Variation. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ► pp. 571 ff.
Silec-Plessis, Tatjana
2020. Ipomedon and the elusive nature of blunders in the courtly literature of medieval England. In Manners, Norms and Transgressions in the History of English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 312], ► pp. 26 ff.
Szczepaniak-Kozak, Anna
2016. Interlanguage Pragmatics of EFL Advanced Learners: Insights from a Longitudinal Study into the Development of the Speech Act of Request in the Polish Context. In Classroom-Oriented Research [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 197 ff.
Szczepaniak-Kozak, Anna
2021. Pragmatic accent: Sociolinguistic and pragmalinguistic examples. In Angewandte Linguistik – Neue Herausforderungen und Konzepte, ► pp. 57 ff.
Tajeddin, Zia, Minoo Alemi & Sajedeh Razzaghi
2014. Cross-cultural Perceptions of Impoliteness by Native English Speakers and EFL Learners: The Case of Apology Speech Act. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research 43:4 ► pp. 304 ff.
Tamimi Sa'd, Seyyed Hatam & Mohammad Mohammadi
2014. A cross-sectional study of request perspective use among Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning 3:5
Taylor, Charlotte
2016. Mock politeness and culture: Perceptions and practice in UK and Italian data. Intercultural Pragmatics 13:4 ► pp. 463 ff.
Tereszkiewicz, Anna
2019. Responding to customer complaints on English and Polish corporate
profiles on Twitter. Pragmatics and Society 10:2 ► pp. 205 ff.
Tereszkiewicz, Anna
2021. Rejecting consumer complaints in customer encounters on Twitter - the case of English and Polish brand communication. Journal of Politeness Research 17:2 ► pp. 189 ff.
Thielemann, Nadine, Regina Göke & Zlatoslava Savych
2021. Motzen und Moral. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 66:1 ► pp. 140 ff.
Unceta Gómez, Luis
2014. Pedir perdón en latín. El acto de habla de la disculpa en las obras de Plauto y Terencio. Emerita 82:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
Vuković, Milica & Vesna Bratić
Wang, Qian, Cindy Sing-Bik Ngai & Rita Gill Singh
2021. A Discursive Analysis of Crisis Response Strategies in CEO Apologies—Drawing on Linguistic Insights from the Appraisal Framework. Management Communication Quarterly 35:4 ► pp. 602 ff.
Weizman, Elda
2022. Explicitating Irony in a Cross-Cultural Perspective: Discursive Practices in Online Op-eds in French and in Hebrew. Contrastive Pragmatics ► pp. 1 ff.
Yang, Na & Jiabei Hu
[no author supplied]
2010. Publications Received. Language in Society 39:4 ► pp. 587 ff.
[no author supplied]
2011. PUBLICATIONS RECEIVED. Language in Society 40:1 ► pp. 135 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2019. Argumentation Mining [Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies, ],
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2021. Fundamentals of Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 13 ff.
[no author supplied]
2021. Approaches and Methods in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 567 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CFG: Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General