Article published in:Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Academic Discourse
Edited by Eija Suomela-Salmi and Fred Dervin
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 193] 2009
► pp. 83–108
Polyphony in academic discourse
A cross-cultural perspective on historical discourse
The study presented in this paper is based on an analysis of openings of historical research articles in English and in Italian and uses openings in economics research articles for disciplinary comparison. The paper starts by outlining some basic assumptions of this “double” cross-cultural perspective: in the context of an approach to writer’s identity based on the notion of multiple identities, its focus lies on both national and disciplinary communities. Including consideration of both textual rhetoric and language features, the study explores the way the writer’s voice interacts with other voices – in particular discourse actors, i.e. historical characters and witnesses - in the opening of the research article, across disciplines and across national academic cultures. Attention is also paid to the more or less explicit presence of the writer’s voice in stating the purpose of the article.
Published online: 19 November 2009
Cited by 5 other publications
Kozubíková Šandová, Jana
Vassileva, Irena G.
Zibalas, Deividas & Jolanta Šinkūnienė
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.