Part of
Discourses in InteractionEdited by Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen, Marja-Liisa Helasvuo, Marjut Johansson and Mia Raitaniemi
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 203] 2010
► pp. 33–60
Edited by Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen, Marja-Liisa Helasvuo, Marjut Johansson and Mia Raitaniemi
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 203] 2010
► pp. 33–60
Communicative activity types as organisations in discourses and discourses in organisations
This paper outlines a ‘dialogical’ perspective on discourse, more precisely on spoken, interactional discourse . Its focus is on interaction and contexts. Central notions in a dialogical account of talk-in-interaction are those of ‘communicative project’ and ‘communicative activity type’. This implies a dynamic interpretation of what ‘organisation(s) in discourse’ are about.
Cited by
Cited by 19 other publications
Aijmer, Karin
2016. Pragmatic markers as constructions. The case of anyway. In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178], ► pp. 29 ff. 
Archer, Dawn, Piotr Jagodziński & Rebecca Jagodziński
2021. Activity Types and Genres. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 206 ff.
Arneback, Emma & Mona Blåsjö
2017. Doing interdisciplinarity in teacher education. Resources for learning through writing in two educational programmes. Education Inquiry 8:4 ► pp. 299 ff.
Asllani, Arben, Diane Halstead & Valerie A. Taylor
2020. A Text Mining Investigation of the Presence and Emotional Impact of Religious Language in Service Organizations’ Websites. Services Marketing Quarterly 41:1 ► pp. 68 ff.
Christensson, Johan
2020. Interactional role shift as communicative project in student teachers’ oral presentations. Multimodal Communication 9:2
Gerhardt, Cornelia & Elisabeth Reber
2019. Embodied Activities. In Embodied Activities in Face-to-face and Mediated Settings, ► pp. 3 ff.
Gundrosen, Stine, Ellen Andenæs, Petter Aadahl & Gøril Thomassen
2016. Team talk and team activity in simulated medical emergencies: a discourse analytical approach. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 24:1
Kluge, Anders
2019. Learning science with an interactive simulator: negotiating the practice-theory barrier. International Journal of Science Education 41:8 ► pp. 1071 ff.
Linell, Per
Mustajoki, Arto & Alla Baikulova
Mustajoki, Arto & Alla Baikulova
2022. Avoidance of cognitive efforts as a risk factor in interaction. Discourse Studies 24:3 ► pp. 269 ff.
Myrberg, Karin, Lars-Christer Hydén & Christina Samuelsson
2020. The mini-mental state examination (MMSE) from a language perspective: an analysis of test interaction. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 34:7 ► pp. 652 ff.
Riis-Johansen, Marit Olave
2020. «Sånn formelle ting som jeg bare måsi»: Kommunikative dilemma i presentasjonen av formalia i politiavhør. Nordic Journal of Studies in Policing 7:1 ► pp. 23 ff.
Roundy, Philip T.
2016. Start-up Community Narratives: The Discursive Construction of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. The Journal of Entrepreneurship 25:2 ► pp. 232 ff.
Simonsen, Line Maria
2021. Hybrid presence: Integrating interprofessional interactions with digital consultations. Nordicom Review 42:s4 ► pp. 22 ff.
Solli, Anne
2021. Appeals to Science: Recirculation of Online Claims in Socioscientific Reasoning. Research in Science Education 51:S2 ► pp. 983 ff.
Warnicke, Camilla & Charlotta Plejert
2018. The headset as an interactional resource in a video relay interpreting (VRI) setting. Interpreting. International Journal of Research and Practice in Interpreting 20:2 ► pp. 285 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2021. Fundamentals of Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 13 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.