The Pragmatics of Requests and Apologies

Developmental patterns of Mexican students

| Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, México
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027256188 | EUR 95.00 | USD 143.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027285034 | EUR 95.00 | USD 143.00
 
The purpose of this research is to analyse the pragmatic development of language groups at different proficiency levels and to investigate the relationship between interlanguage pragmatics and grammatical competence. For this study, 36 native Spanish speaking EFL learners at different proficiency levels were asked to respond in English to 24 different situations that called for the speech acts of request and apology. Results showed three important aspects. The first finding suggested that basic adult learners possess a pragmatic knowledge in their L1 that allows them to focus on the intended meaning and, in most cases, to assemble an utterance that conveys a pragmatic intention and satisfies the communicative demands of a social situation. The second finding revealed that there are two essential conditions to communicate a linguistic action: the knowledge of the relevant linguistic rules and the knowledge of how to use them appropriately and effectively in a specific context. The findings further suggested that advanced learners possess the grammatical knowledge to produce an illocutionary act, but they need to learn the specific L2 pragmatic conventions that enable them to know when to use these grammatical forms and under which circumstances.
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 212]  2011.  xi, 263 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
Acknowledgments
xi
List of tables
ix–x
1. Introduction
1–4
2. Acquisitional issues in pragmatics
5–46
3. Methodology
47–62
4. Analysis of results
63–176
5. Summary of findings
177–204
6. Conclusions
205–218
References
219–224
Appendix 1
225–226
Appendix 2
227–230
Appendix 3
231–246
Appendix 4
247–258
Name index
259–260
Subject index
261–263
“The strengths of this volume lie in its comprehensive analyses, robust review of the literature, clear situation of the study in relation to prior work in the field, and insights regarding the acquisition process of pragmatic abilities. [...] The author is to be commended for making her study relevant not only for linguists but also for language teachers.”
“This book makes a contribution to research engaged in interlanguage pragmatic development. What appears remarkable is the emphasis the author gives to the importance of supporting second language learners in acquiring control over their L1 pragmatic knowledge by means of which it is possible to develop new representations of pragmalinguistic and sociopragmatic knowledge in the second language. Accordingly, the practical suggestions provided by the author in order to introduce innovative practices and activities related to the development of pragmatic ability in second language classrooms turn out to be highly valuable for a target audience not just of linguists but especially of language teachers and teaching material designers.”
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Ali, Ziyad & Helen Woodfield
2017.  In Current Issues in Intercultural Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 274],  pp. 297 ff. Crossref logo
Bartley, Leanne & Encarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio
2016. “Well, I think that my argument is…,” or modality in a learner corpus of English. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 29:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Bella, Spyridoula
2014. A contrastive study of apologies performed by Greek native speakers and English learners of Greek as a foreign language. Pragmatics 24:4  pp. 679 ff. Crossref logo
Bella, Spyridoula
2016. Offers by Greek FL learners. Pragmatics 26:4  pp. 531 ff. Crossref logo
Glynn, Dylan
2014.  In Corpus Methods for Semantics [Human Cognitive Processing, 43],  pp. 307 ff. Crossref logo
Liu, Jianda & Wei Ren
2016.  In Email Discourse Among Chinese Using English as a Lingua Franca,  pp. 205 ff. Crossref logo
Lutzky, Ursula & Andrew Kehoe
2017. “I apologise for my poor blogging”: Searching for Apologies in the Birmingham Blog Corpus. Corpus Pragmatics 1:1  pp. 37 ff. Crossref logo
Marsily, Aurélie
2018. Directness vs. indirectness. Languages in Contrast 18:1  pp. 122 ff. Crossref logo
Masaeed, Khaled Al, Naoko Taguchi & Mohammed Tamimi
2020. Proficiency effects on L2 Arabic refusals. Applied Pragmatics 2:1  pp. 26 ff. Crossref logo
Mondada, Lorenza & Marja-Leena Sorjonen
2016. Making multiple requests in French and Finnish convenience stores. Language in Society 45:5  pp. 733 ff. Crossref logo
Reagan, Derek & Caroline Payant
2018.  In Task-Based Approaches to Teaching and Assessing Pragmatics [Task-Based Language Teaching, 10],  pp. 114 ff. Crossref logo
Rieger, Caroline L.
2017. “I want a real apology”. Pragmatics 27:4  pp. 553 ff. Crossref logo
Rossi, Giovanni
2014.  In Requesting in Social Interaction [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 26],  pp. 303 ff. Crossref logo
Rudneva, Ekaterina
2019. How Russians pre-request and seek assistance: a study of interaction in two communities of practice. Russian Linguistics 43:2  pp. 127 ff. Crossref logo
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena, Liisa Raevaara & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2017.  In Imperative Turns at Talk [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 30],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Stavans, Anat & Ronit Webman Shafran
2018. The pragmatics of requests and refusals in multilingual settings. International Journal of Multilingualism 15:2  pp. 149 ff. Crossref logo
Taguchi, Naoko
2018.  In The Handbook of Advanced Proficiency in Second Language Acquisition,  pp. 505 ff. Crossref logo
Önalan, Okan & Abdulvahit Çakır
2018. A Comparative Study on Speech Acts: Formal Complaints by Native Speakers and Turkish Learners of English. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics 4:2  pp. 239 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 may 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2011022401