The Pragmatics of Requests and Apologies

Developmental patterns of Mexican students

Author
Elizabeth Flores-Salgado | Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, México
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027256188 | EUR 95.00 | USD 143.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027285034 | EUR 95.00 | USD 143.00
 
Google Play logo
The purpose of this research is to analyse the pragmatic development of language groups at different proficiency levels and to investigate the relationship between interlanguage pragmatics and grammatical competence. For this study, 36 native Spanish speaking EFL learners at different proficiency levels were asked to respond in English to 24 different situations that called for the speech acts of request and apology. Results showed three important aspects. The first finding suggested that basic adult learners possess a pragmatic knowledge in their L1 that allows them to focus on the intended meaning and, in most cases, to assemble an utterance that conveys a pragmatic intention and satisfies the communicative demands of a social situation. The second finding revealed that there are two essential conditions to communicate a linguistic action: the knowledge of the relevant linguistic rules and the knowledge of how to use them appropriately and effectively in a specific context. The findings further suggested that advanced learners possess the grammatical knowledge to produce an illocutionary act, but they need to learn the specific L2 pragmatic conventions that enable them to know when to use these grammatical forms and under which circumstances.
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 212] 2011.  xi, 263 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
“The strengths of this volume lie in its comprehensive analyses, robust review of the literature, clear situation of the study in relation to prior work in the field, and insights regarding the acquisition process of pragmatic abilities. [...] The author is to be commended for making her study relevant not only for linguists but also for language teachers.”
“This book makes a contribution to research engaged in interlanguage pragmatic development. What appears remarkable is the emphasis the author gives to the importance of supporting second language learners in acquiring control over their L1 pragmatic knowledge by means of which it is possible to develop new representations of pragmalinguistic and sociopragmatic knowledge in the second language. Accordingly, the practical suggestions provided by the author in order to introduce innovative practices and activities related to the development of pragmatic ability in second language classrooms turn out to be highly valuable for a target audience not just of linguists but especially of language teachers and teaching material designers.”
Cited by

Cited by 28 other publications

Al Masaeed, Khaled , Naoko Taguchi & Mohammed Tamimi
2020. Proficiency effects on L2 Arabic refusals. Applied Pragmatics 2:1  pp. 26 ff. DOI logo
Al-Azraqi, Munira Ali, Albandari Awad Alqahtani & Dalal Alfuhaid
2024. Gender and Age Differences in Using Apology Strategies in Saudi Arabia. Sage Open 14:2 DOI logo
Ali, Ziyad & Helen Woodfield
2017. Chapter 13. A cross­sectional study of Syrian EFL learners’ pragmatic development. In Current Issues in Intercultural Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 274],  pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
Almalki, Ziad & Christian Jones
2022. ‘Why did you do that?’ The effects of instruction on recognition and production of informal second party complaints. The Language Learning Journal 50:4  pp. 443 ff. DOI logo
An, Yi, Hang Su & Mingyou Xiang
2022. Apology responses and gender differences in spoken British English. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 32:1  pp. 28 ff. DOI logo
Bartley, Leanne & Encarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio
2016. “Well, I think that my argument is…,” or modality in a learner corpus of English. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 29:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Bella, Spyridoula
2022. Offers by Greek FL learners. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 531 ff. DOI logo
Bella, Spyridoula
2022. A contrastive study of apologies performed by Greek native speakers and English learners of Greek as a foreign language. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 679 ff. DOI logo
Dashti Khavidaki, Mansooreh
2023. The Interplay of Contextual Variables and Language Proficiency in Request Realization. SAGE Open 13:4 DOI logo
Glynn, Dylan
2014. Techniques and tools. In Corpus Methods for Semantics [Human Cognitive Processing, 43],  pp. 307 ff. DOI logo
Lahodová, Marie
2020. Functional Plurality of Language in Contextualised Discourse,  pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Jianda & Wei Ren
2016. Apologies in Emails: Interactions Between Chinese EFL Learners and Their Foreign Peers. In Email Discourse Among Chinese Using English as a Lingua Franca,  pp. 205 ff. DOI logo
Lutzky, Ursula & Andrew Kehoe
2017. “I apologise for my poor blogging”: Searching for Apologies in the Birmingham Blog Corpus. Corpus Pragmatics 1:1  pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Marsily, Aurélie
2018. Directness vs. indirectness. Languages in Contrast 18:1  pp. 122 ff. DOI logo
Miura, Aika
2021. Extracting learner-specific pragmalinguistic features: a study of requestive speech acts produced by Japanese low-proficiency English learners. SN Social Sciences 1:6 DOI logo
Mondada, Lorenza & Marja-Leena Sorjonen
2016. Making multiple requests in French and Finnish convenience stores. Language in Society 45:5  pp. 733 ff. DOI logo
Morales Ruiz, Jenny
2023. Los reclamos por correo electrónico: efectos de la instrucción pragmática con enfoque por tareas en el español L2 Emails of complaints: the effects of task-based pragmatic instruction in L2 Spanish. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching 10:1  pp. 14 ff. DOI logo
Reagan, Derek & Caroline Payant
2018. Chapter 5. Task modality effects on Spanish learners’ interlanguage pragmatic development. In Task-Based Approaches to Teaching and Assessing Pragmatics [Task-Based Language Teaching, 10],  pp. 114 ff. DOI logo
Rieger, Caroline L.
2022. “I want a real apology”. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 553 ff. DOI logo
Rossi, Giovanni
2014. When do people not use language to make requests?*. In Requesting in Social Interaction [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 26],  pp. 303 ff. DOI logo
Rudneva, Ekaterina
2019. How Russians pre-request and seek assistance: a study of interaction in two communities of practice. Russian Linguistics 43:2  pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Schoppa, Dominik Jan
2022. Conceptualizing Illocutions in Context: A Variationist Perspective on the Meta-Illocutionary Lexicon. Corpus Pragmatics 6:1  pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena, Liisa Raevaara & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2017. Chapter 1. Imperative turns at talk. In Imperative Turns at Talk [Studies in Language and Social Interaction, 30],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Stavans, Anat & Ronit Webman Shafran
2018. The pragmatics of requests and refusals in multilingual settings. International Journal of Multilingualism 15:2  pp. 149 ff. DOI logo
Taguchi, Naoko
2018. Advanced Second Language Pragmatic Competence. In The Handbook of Advanced Proficiency in Second Language Acquisition,  pp. 505 ff. DOI logo
Vališová, Marie
2019. Řečové akty omluvy u českých studentů v angličtině (L2): vybrané výsledky pilotáže. In Výzkum v didaktice cizích jazyků II,  pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Önalan, Okan & Abdulvahit Çakır
2018. A Comparative Study on Speech Acts: Formal Complaints by Native Speakers and Turkish Learners of English. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics 4:2  pp. 239 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects

Main BIC Subject

CFG: Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis

Main BISAC Subject

LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2011022401 | Marc record