This chapter explores the Hebrew anaxnu (‘we’) in Israeli political radio phone-in programs. Using the ‘we,’ participants create or refer to seven social groups: the conversation ‘we’; the program ‘we’; the delimited social ‘we’; the opposing general ‘we’, the open general ‘we’; the humanity ‘we’; and the vocal ‘we’. The functions of ‘we’ differ by participant: hosts use the conversation ‘we’ to manage interactions whereas callers use the general ‘we’ to create a public sphere. Using an extended excerpt, we illustrate a variant of the “fluidity of ‘we’” and its significance to the participants’ identity-displays. The first person plural therefore creates social groups in media interactions, both on the micro and macro societal levels.
2000. “Identity and political stability in an ethnically diverse state: A study of Bedouin Arab youth in Israel.” Social Identities6(1): 49–61.
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan and Finegan, Edward
. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education.
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Blondheim, Menachem and Hacohen, Gonen
. 2002. “Traditions of dispute: From negotiations of Talmudic texts to the arena of political discourse in the media.” Journal of Pragmatics34(10–11): 1569–1594.
Bull, Peter and Fetzer Anita
. 2006. “Who are we and who are you? The strategic use of forms of address in political interviews.” Text & Talk26(1): 3–37.
Cooley, Charles Horton
. 1909. Social Organization. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Dori-Hacohen, Gonen
. 2011. “Integrating and divisive discourses: The discourse in interactions with non-Jewish callers on Israeli radio phone-in programs.” Israel Studies in Language and Society3(2): 146–165.
Dori-Hacohen, Gonen
. 2012. ‘“With whom do I have the pleasure?’: Callers’ categories in political talk radio programs.” Journal of Pragmatics44(3): 280–297.
Elias, Norbert
. 1991. The Society of Individuals. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Fairclough, Norman
. 2001. Language and Power (2nd
edition). Longman Press.
Fitzgerald, Richard and Housley, William
. 2002. “Identity, categorization and sequential organization: The sequential and categorial flow of identity in a radio phone-in.” Discourse & Society13(5): 579–602.
Gavriely-Nuri, Dalia
. 2010. “The idiosyncratic language of Israeli ‘peace’: A cultural approach to critical discourse analysis (CCDA).” Discourse & Society21(5): 565–585.
Goffman, Erving
. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Habermas, Jürgen
. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hacohen, Gonen and Schegloff, Emmanuel A.
2006. “On the preference for minimization in referring to persons: Evidence from Hebrew conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics38(8): 1305–1312.
Helmbrecht, Johannes
. 2002. “Grammar and function of we.” InUs and others: Social Identities across Languages, Discourses and Cultures, Anna Duszak(ed.), 31–49. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Hazan, Haim
. 2001. Simulated Dreams: Israeli Youth and Virtual Zionism. New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Hutchby, Ian
. 1996. Confrontation Talk: Arguments, Asymmetries, and Power on Talk Radio. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Hutchby, Ian
. 2001. “‘Witnessing’: The use of first-hand knowledge in legitimating lay opinions on talk radio.” Discourse Studies34: 481–497.
Kama, Amit
. 2005. [in Hebrew]One Humane Unit, one the People of Israel: On Establishing Collective Identities in Ha’Aretz ‘Letters to the Editors.’ Tel-Aviv: Haim Herzog Institute for Communication, Society and Politics.
Katriel, Tamar
. 2004. Dialogic Moments: From Soul Talks to Talk Radio in Israeli Culture. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
Kohn, Ayelet
. 2001. [in Hebrew] “‘We’ and ‘everyone’: The representation of Israel’s multi-cultural society in the media.” Kesher30: 42–50.
Lerner, Gene and Kitzinger, Celia
. 2007. “Extraction and aggregation in the repair of individual and collective self-reference.” Discourse Studies9(4): 526–557.
2003. “‘What’s in a name?’: Vocatives in casual conversations and radio phone-in calls.” InCorpus Analysis: Language Structure and Language Use, Pepi Leistyna and Charles F. Meyer(eds), 153–185. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Mühlhäusler, Peter and Harré, Rom
. 1990. Pronouns and People: The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Noy, Chaim
(2006). A Narrative Community: Voices of Israeli Backpackers. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula
. 2012. “Collective aspects of subjectivity: The subject pronoun εμε?ς (‘we’) in Modern Greek.” InSubjectivity in Language and in Discourse, Nicole Baumgarten, Inke Du Bois and Juliane House(eds), 33–65. Leiden: Brill.
Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula
. this volume (1). “Contructing collectivity with ‘we’: An introduction.” InConstructing Collectivity: ‘We’ across Languages and Contexts, Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou(ed.). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula
. this volume (2). “Replying with the freestanding ‘we’ in Greek conversations.” InConstructing Collectivity: ‘We’ across Languages and Contexts, Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou(ed.). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Pomerantz, Anita
. 1984. “Pursuing a response.” InStructures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage(eds), 152–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pounds, Gabrina
. 2006. “Democratic participation and letters to the editor in Britain and Italy.” Discourse & Society17(1): 29–64.
Sacks, Harvey
. 1992. Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
1987. “Some sources of misunderstanding in talk-in-interaction.” Linguistics25: 201–218.
Schegloff, Emmanuel A., Jefferson, Gail and Sacks, Harvey
. 1977. “The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation.” Language53(2): 361–382.
Schütz, Alfred
. 1970. On Phenomenology and Social Relations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Silverstein, Michael
. 1976. “Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description.’ InMeaning in Anthropology, Henry A. Selby and Keith H. Basso(eds), 11–55. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
Tannen, Deborah
. 1988. “Hearing voices in conversation, fiction, and mixed genres.” InLinguistics in Context: Connecting Observation and Understanding, Deborah Tannen(ed.), 89–113. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Urban, George
. 1988. “The pronominal pragmatics of nuclear war discourse.” Multilingua7: 67–93.
2015. Negotiating Norms of Discussion in the Public Arena: The Use of Irony in Israeli Political Radio Phone-In Programs. Journal of Communication 65:6 ► pp. 909 ff.
2021. Multiaddressivity and Collective Addressivity in Vlog‐based Interactions between Diasporic and Nonmigrant Portuguese. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 31:1 ► pp. 97 ff.
LaCasse, Dora
2019. The persistence of expression: Clusivity, partial co-reference, and socioeconomic differentiation of first person plural subject pronoun expression in Spanish. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 12:1 ► pp. 65 ff.
2021. Balancing institutional authority and children’s agency. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders 10:2
Shavit, Nimrod & Benjamin H. Bailey
2015. Between the Procedural and the Substantial: Democratic Deliberation and the Interaction Order in “Occupy Middletown General Assembly”. Symbolic Interaction 38:1 ► pp. 103 ff.
Shrikant, Natasha
2018. The Discursive Construction of Race as a Professional Identity Category in Two Texas Chambers of Commerce. International Journal of Business Communication 55:1 ► pp. 94 ff.
Shrikant, Natasha
2018. “There’s no such thing as Asian”: A membership categorization analysis of cross-cultural adaptation in an Asian American business community. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication 11:4 ► pp. 286 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.