Article published in:
Constructing Collectivity: 'We' across languages and contexts
Edited by Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 239] 2014
► pp. 331350
References

References

Austin, John L.
1971. How to Do Things with Words . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bazzanella, Carla.
2002. “The significance of context in comprehension: The we case. Foundations of Science 7: 239-254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Peter and Fetzer, Anita.
2006. “Who are we and who are you? The strategic use of forms of address in political interviews. Text & Talk 26: 1-36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul and Schäffner, Christina
. 2002. “Introduction: Themes and principles in the analysis of political discourse.” In Politics as Text and Talk: Analytical Approaches to Political Discourse , PaulChilton and ChristinaSchäffner (eds), 1-41. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. and Wilkes-Gibbs, Deanna
. 1992. “Referring as a collaborative process.” In Intentions in Communication , Philip R.Cohen , JerryMorgan and Martha E.Pollack (eds), 463-493. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro.
2006. “Narrating the political self in a campaign for U.S. Congress. Language in Society 35: 467-497. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Fina, Anna
. 1995. “Pronominal choice, identity and solidarity in political discourse. Text 15: 379-410. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman.
1995. Media Discourse . London: Arnold.Google Scholar
1998. “Political discourse in the media: Analytical framework.” In Approaches to Media Discourse , AllanBell and PeterGarret (eds), 142-162. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita
. 2010. “Small stories in political discourse: The public self goes private.” In Narratives Revisited , ChristianHoffman (ed.), 163-183. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “«Here is the difference, here is the passion, here is the chance to be part of a great change»: Strategic context importation in political discourse.” In Contexts in Context: Parts Meet Whole? , AnitaFetzer and EtsukoOishi (eds), 115-146. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita and Weizman, Elda.
2006. “Political discourse as mediated and public discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 38(2): 143-153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita and Bull, Peter.
2008. “«I don’t mean you personally, forgive me, I mean generally»: The strategic use of pronouns in political interviews. Journal of Language and Politics 7(2): 271-289. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012. “Doing leadership in political speech: Semantic processes and pragmatic inferences. Discourse & Society 23(2): 127-144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold.
1994. Studies in Ethnomethodology . Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy.
1993. English Grammar: A Function-Based Introduction . Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving.
1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
1981. Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J.
1996. “The linguistic and cultural relativity of inference.” In Rethinking Linguistic Relativity , John J.Gumperz and Stephen C.Levinson (eds), 374-406. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Iñigo-Mora, Isabel.
2004. “On the use of the personal pronoun we in communities. Journal of Language and Politics 3: 27-52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janney, Richard W.
2002. “Cotext as context: Vague answers in court. Language & Communication 22(4): 457-475. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lauerbach, Gerda and Fetzer, Anita
. 2007. “Introduction.” In Political Discourse in the Media: Cross-Cultural Perspectives , AnitaFetzer and GerdaLauerbach (eds), 3-30. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mülhäusler, Peter and Harré, Rom.
1990. Pronouns and People: The linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Park, Joseph Sung-Yul and Bucholtz, Mary
. 2009. “Public transcripts: Entextualization and linguistic representation in institutional contexts. Text & Talk 5: 485-502. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula.
2012. “Collective aspects of subjectivity: The subject pronoun εμείς (‘we’) in Modern Greek.” In Subjectivity in Language and in Discourse , NicoleBaumgarten , Inke DuBois and JulianeHouse (eds), 33-65. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pyykkö, Ritta
. 2002. “Who is ‘us’ in Russian political discourse.” In Us and Others , AnnaDuszak (ed.), 233-248. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skarzynska, Krystyna
. 2002. “WE and THEY in Polish political discourse.” In Us and Others: Social Identities across Languages, Discourses and Cultures , AnnaDuszak (ed.), 249-264. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey.
1995. Lectures on Conversation (ed. by GailJefferson). Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John.
1969. Speech Acts . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, John.
1990. Politically Speaking: The Pragmatic Analysis of Political Language . Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

No author info given
2019.  In Discourse and Political Culture [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 86], Crossref logo
No author info given
2021.  In The Politics of Person Reference [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 320], Crossref logo
Armon, Rony & Ayelet Baram-Tsabari
2017. Our findings, my method: Framing science in televised interviews. Public Understanding of Science 26:8  pp. 986 ff. Crossref logo
Fetzer, Anita
2015.  In The Dynamics of Political Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 259],  pp. 245 ff. Crossref logo
Jaworska, Sylvia & Tigran Sogomonian
2019.  In Reference and Identity in Public Discourses [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 306],  pp. 181 ff. Crossref logo
Kleinke, Sonja, Nuria Hernández & Birte Bös
2018.  In The Discursive Construction of Identities On- and Offline [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 78],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Kranert, Michael
2017. ‘Today I offer you, and we offer the country a new vision’: The strategic use of first person pronouns in party conference speeches of the Third Way. Discourse & Society 28:2  pp. 182 ff. Crossref logo
Săftoiu, Răzvan
2015. Split voices in political discourse. Language and Dialogue 5:3  pp. 430 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.