Article published in:Linguistic Approaches to Emotions in Context
Edited by Fabienne H. Baider and Georgeta Cislaru
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 241] 2014
► pp. 39–70
Passion, a forgotten feeling
When contemporary sciences and humanities use the term emotion while discussing human mental-sentient dynamics, they usually don’t question its supposed status of a conceptual universal. Yet, despite its frequent usage, the term is surprisingly ambiguous, and its universality status is highly dubious. For instance, it shows not to be particularly adequate for the analysis of the Croatian Church Slavonic (acr. CCS) lexis that expresses phenomena linked to the human mental-sentient dynamics. Instead, this lexis seems to be in concordance with the concepts pertaining to the medieval paradigm relying on the Latin terms passio (Eng. equivalent: passion) and affectus (Eng. equivalent affect). The paradigm is articulated in the most interesting way by Thomas Aquinas (Summa theologiae, acr. ST Ia.IIae.22–48) and unfortunately almost forgotten or unwarrantably confounded with the paradigm of emotions.The third option in conceptualizing human mental-sentient dynamics (besides those that rely on emotions on one hand, and passions and affect on the other) argues that the concept FEEL is the most convincing universal candidate. Namely, the researchers of the Natural Semantic Metalanguage (acr. NSM) hypothesis present substantial theoretical evidence and ample amounts of corroborating data from typologically different languages of the world that back up such a proposal. This paper benefits from this finding, since the word FEEL, and NSM in general, proved to be an adequate tool for delineating similarities and differences between concepts of ‘emotion’, Lat. ‘passio’ and Lat. ‘affectus’.
Published online: 13 March 2014
. Summa theologiae. http://www.corpusthomisticum.org/ (17 September 2011).
. De veritate. http://www.corpusthomisticum.org/qdv25.html (17 September 2011).
Cornelius, Randolph R.
1649 Les Passions de l’ame. Paris: Chez Henry Le Gras; http://net.cgu.edu/philosophy/descartes/Passions_Letters.html (17 September 2011, with English translation also available)
Goddard, Cliff, and Anna Wierzbicka.
Goddard, Cliff, and Anna Wierzbicka
Kuhn, Thomas S.
Lombardo, Nicholas E.
Lewis, Michael, Jeannette M. Haviland-Jones, and Lisa Feldman Barrett
Mallory, James P., and Douglas Q. Adams
2010 “Poloaj crkvenoslavenskoga jezika u hrvatskoj srednjovjekovnoj kulturi.” In Свети Наум Охридски и словенската духовна, културна и писмена традиција (организиран по повод 1100-годишнината од смртта на св. Наум Охридски). Зборник на трудови од Меѓународниот научен собир. Охрид, 4–7 ноември , , ed. by Ilija Velev, Aco Girevski, Liljana Makarijoska, Ilija Piperkoski, and Kostadina Mokrova, 229–238.Скопје: Универзитет “Св. Кирил и Методи“.
Scherer, Klaus. R., Angela Schorr, and Tom Johnstone
Shweder, Richard A., Jonathan Haidt, Randall Horton, and Craig Joseph
Solomon, Robert C.
Strongman, Kenneth T.
VandenBos, Gary R.
2012(a) “Dobro i zlo – dva lica ljubavi (značenjska raščlamba hrvatskih crkvenoslavenskih leksema osnova izvedenih iz korijena ljub-).” In Poj eljno! Iskazivanje i poimanje emocija u hrvatskoj pisanoj kulturi srednjega i novoga vijeka, ed. by Amir Kapetanović, 25–85 . Zagreb: Institut za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovlje.
Cited by other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.