Article published in:
Linguistic Approaches to Emotions in Context
Edited by Fabienne H. Baider and Georgeta Cislaru
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 241] 2014
► pp. 137–158

The expression of emotions in conditionals

A study of Modern Greek political speech

| School of English, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
The aim of this paper is to examine the ways that emotions are communicated in conditionals employed in Greek political speeches. In particular, it is suggested that conditional constructions along with their conjunctions, such as the markers an (if) and ean (if) carry a particular emotional load in the Greek political context. Based on Athanasiadou and Dirven’ s (1996) typology of if-clauses, a sample of conditionals was analysed. The findings show a prevalence of the pragmatic conditional type; a conditional type with an intense conversational nature which carries specific illocutionary acts, such as warning, request or advice, accompanied most of the time by negative emotions, such as anger, dislike, contempt, irritation, alarm, intimidation and pride. In other words, the choice of the pragmatic type in combination with certain conjunctions is associated with specific negative emotions which consequently generate reactions such as sarcasm, irony, scaremongering, cajolery and fake politeness. Overall, the paper discusses devices through which conditional constructions reflect emotions.
Published online: 13 March 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.241.09lam
References

References

Athanasiadou, Angeliki, and René Dirven.
1996 “Typology of if-clauses.” In Cognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods. The Expansion of a New Paradigm in Linguistics, ed. by Eugene H. Casad, 609–654. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Athanasiadou, Angeliki and René Dirven.
2000 “Pragmatic conditionals.” In Constructions in Cognitive Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference Amsterdam 1997, ed. by Ad Foolen and Frederike van der Leek, 1–26. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Babiniotis, Georgios
2009 Etymological Dictionary of Modern Greek, 1st Edition. Lexicology Centre Print.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian M.
1995 Justice as Impartiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Bruce, John M., and Clyde Wilcox.
1998 “The changing politics of gun control.” In The Sentimental Citizen: Emotion in Democratic Politics, ed. by George E. Marcus. USA: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul
2004 Analyzing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
Cislaru, Georgia
2012 “Emotions as a rhetorical tool in political discourse.” In Rhetoric and Politics: Central/Eastern European Perspectives, ed. by Maria Zaleska, 107–126. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1986 Conditionals: a typology. In On Conditionals ed. by Elizatbeth C, Traugott, Alice Meulen, Charles A. Ferguson and Snitzer Reilly Judy, 77–99. Cambridge-London: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara, and Eve Sweetser.
2005 Mental Spaces in Grammar: Conditional Constructions (ambridge Studies in Linguistics 108). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Damasio, Antonio
1995 [1994], L’Erreur de Descartes, Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Dirven, Ren
é, and Angeliki Athanasiadou. 2005 “IF and it’s near synonyms in different contextual uses.” In Life in Language. Studies in Honor of Wolfgang Kuehlwein, ed. by Andreas Schuth, Kristine Horner, and Jean-Jacques Weber, 97–120. Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael, and K. Alexander
1978 Language as social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
James, William
1884 “What is an emotion?” Mind 9: 188–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltan.
2000 Metaphor and emotion: Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán.
2002 Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán, Gary B. Palmer and René Dirven.
2002 “Language and emotion: The interplay of conceptualization with physiology and culture”. In Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast ed. by René, Dirven and Ralf Pörings, 133–159. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George
1987 Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 The Political Mind: A Cognitive Scientist’s Guide to Your Brain and It’s Politics. Penguin (Non-Classics), Reprint edition.Google Scholar
Lampropoulou Martha
2009 Conditionality in Greek Political Speech: An empirical analysis. MA Dissertation. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.Google Scholar
LDC
1975 Leuven Drama Corpus.Google Scholar
Marcus, George, E.
2002 The Sentimental Citizen: Emotion in Democratic Politics. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania University.Google Scholar
Oatley, Keith, and Philip N. Johnson-Laird
1987 “Towards a cognitive theory of emotions.” Cognition & Emotion 1: 29–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Online Dictionary of Standard Modern Greek
. 2006–2008. Center of Greek Language, Portal 12 th of October 2012 <www.greek-language.gr>Google Scholar
Ortony, Andrew, Gerald Clore, and Collins Allan.
1990 The Cognitive Structure of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parrott, Gerrod, W.
2001 Emotions in Social Psychology. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven, Martin A. Nowak and James L. Lee
2008 “The logic of indirect speech.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(3): 833–838. <www​.pnas​.org​_cgi​_doi​_10​.1073​_pnas​.0707192105> CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor
1975 “Cognitive reference points.” Cognitive Psychology 7 (4): 532–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1978 Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Syntax of Modern Greek 2008.Google Scholar
Συντακτικό της Νας Ελληνικλς
Α΄ ΒΒ και ΓΓ Γυμνασίου 2008 Συγγραφικ ομδα ΚΕΜΕ. Οργανισμς Εκδ?σεων Διδακτικ?ν Βιβλ?ων Αθ?να, 143–145.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1976 “Semantic causative types.” In Syntax and Semantics 6: The Grammar of Causative Constructions , ed. by Shibatani Masayoshi, 43–116. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tomkins, Silvan, S. and Robert Mc Carter.
1964 “What and where are the primary affects: Some evidence for a theory.” Perceptual and Motor Skills 18: 119–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomkins, Silvan, S.
1984 “Affect theory.” In Approaches to Emotion, ed. by Klaus R. Scherer and Paul Ekman, 163–195. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Wardhaugh, Ronald
1986 An Introduction to Sociolinguistics, (2nd edition.). Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Weiner, Bernard, and Sandra Graham.
1984 “An attributional approach to emotional development.” In Emotions, Cognition, and Behavior, ed. by Carrole E. Izard, Jerom Kagan, and Robert B. Zajonc, 167–191. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Fronhofer, Nina-Maria
2019.  In Emotion in Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 302], ► pp. 213 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.