Article published in:
Evaluation in Context
Edited by Geoff Thompson † and Laura Alba-Juez
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 242] 2014
► pp. 179194
André, Carine, Ghio, Alain, Cavé, Christian and Teston, Bernard.
1995-2003 PERCEVAL: PERCeption EVALuation Auditive & Visuelle, Université d’Aix-en-Provence. Available at http://​aune​.lpl​.univ​-aix​.fr​/~lpldev​/perceval .
Alba-Juez, Laura.
2009Perspectives on Discourse Analysis. Theory and Practice. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars PublishingGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Mary E. and Pierrehumbert, Janet.
1986“Intonational structure in Japanese and English”. Phonology Yearbook 3: 255–255. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul and Weenink, David.
2010Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer.   Available at http://​www​.fon​.hum​.uva​.nl​/praat/
Brown, Penelope and Levinson, Stephen C.
1987Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Aoju.
2003“Reaction time as an indicator of discrete intonational contrasts in English”. Eurospeech 2003 Genève. Available at http://​www​.let​.ru​.nl​/gep​/carlos​/AojuEurospeech2003​.pdf Google Scholar
Cruttenden, Alan.
1986Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, David.
1969Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Pijper, Jan R.
1983Modelling British English Intonation. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Dolson, Mark.
1994“The pitch of speech as a function of linguistic community”. Music Perception 11: 321–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Hartwig and Laver, John.
1994Menschen und ihre Stimmen: Aspekte der vokalen Kommunikation. Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.Google Scholar
Estebas-Vilaplana, Eva.
2009Teach Yourself English Pronunciation. A Coruña: Netbiblo. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Estebas-Vilaplana, Eva and Prieto, Pilar.
2008“La notación prosódica del español: una revisión del Sp_ToBI.” Estudios de Fonética Experimental 17: 265–265.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce.
1990“Perspectives on politeness”. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 219–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbon, Dafydd.
1998“German intonation”. In Intonation Systems, Daniel Hirst and Albert di Cristo (eds), 78–95. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Georgia M.
1989Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul.
1975“Logic and conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics III: Speech Acts, Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan (eds), 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos.
2004The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K.
1967Intonation and Grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert.
1994“Constraints on the gradient variability of pitch range, or, Pitch level 4 lives!” In Phonological Structure and Phonetic Form. Papers in Laboratory Phonology III, Paul A. Keating (ed.), 42–63. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert and Morton, Rachel.
1997“The perception of intonational emphasis: continuous or categorical?Journal of Phonetics 25: 313–313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey.
1983Principles of Pragmatics. Singapore: Longman.Google Scholar
Méndez, Jorge.
2009“El scaling tonal como herramienta prosódica de distinción fonológica: un caso de español caraqueño”. (Trabajo de Fin de Módulo). Madrid: CSIC.Google Scholar
Mennen, Ineke, Chen, Aoju and Karlsson, Fredrik.
2010“Characterising the internal structure of learner intonation and its development over time”. In Proceedings of New Sounds 2010: The sixth international symposium on the acquisition of second language speech. Poznan University.Google Scholar
Mennen, Ineke, Schaeffler, Felix and Docherty, Gerard.
2007“Pitching it differently: a comparison of the pitch ranges of German and English speakers”. In Proceedings of the XVIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Jürgen Trouvain and William J. Barry (eds), 1769–1772. Saarbrücken, Germany. Pirrot GmbH: Dudweiler.Google Scholar
2008“A methodological study into the linguistic dimensions of pitch range differences between German and English”. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Speech Prosody. Campinas (Brasil), 527–530.Google Scholar
Navarro Tomás, Tomás.
1974Manual de Entonación Española. Madrid: Guadarrama. (First edition 1944. New York: Spanish Institute in the United States).Google Scholar
O’Connor, Joseph D. and Arnold, Gordon.
1973The Intonation of Colloquial English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet.
1980The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. MIT, Massachusetts: PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Quilis, Antonio.
1993Tratado de Fonología y Fonética Españolas. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Savino, Michaelina and Grice, Martine.
2007“The role of pitch range in realising pragmatic contrasts: the case of two question types in Italian”. In Proceedings of the XVIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Jürgen Trouvain and William J. Barry (eds.), 1037–1040. Saarbrücken, Germany. Pirrot GmbH: Dudweiler.Google Scholar
Scherer, Klaus R.
2000“A cross-cultural investigation of emotion inferences from voice and speech: implications for speech technology”. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Vol. 2, B. Yuan, T. Huang, and X. Tang (eds.), 379–382. Beijing: China Military Friendship Publish.Google Scholar
Van Bezooijen, Renee.
1995“Sociocultural aspects of pitch differences between Japanese and Dutch women”. Language and Speech 38: 253–65.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vanrell, Maria del Mar.
2006The Phonological Role of Tonal Scaling in Majorcan Catalan Interrogatives. (Research Project). Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
2007“Effect of utterance length on F0 scaling”. In Proceedings of the XVIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Jürgen Trouvain and William J. Barry (eds.), 1165–1168. Saarbrücken, Germany. Pirrot GmbH: Dudweiler.Google Scholar
Wells, John C.
2006English Intonation: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Alvarado, Covadonga Sánchez & Meghan Armstrong
2022. Prosodic Marking of Object Focus in L2 Spanish. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 15:1  pp. 211 ff. Crossref logo
Bogach, Natalia, Elena Boitsova, Sergey Chernonog, Anton Lamtev, Maria Lesnichaya, Iurii Lezhenin, Andrey Novopashenny, Roman Svechnikov, Daria Tsikach, Konstantin Vasiliev, Evgeny Pyshkin & John Blake
2021. Speech Processing for Language Learning: A Practical Approach to Computer-Assisted Pronunciation Teaching. Electronics 10:3  pp. 235 ff. Crossref logo
Kučiš, Vlasta & Simona Majhenič
2018. Cultural and stress-related manifestations of political controversial language in the European Parliament from the view of interpreters. Babel. Revue internationale de la traduction / International Journal of Translation 64:1  pp. 33 ff. Crossref logo
Pennington, Martha C. & Pamela Rogerson-Revell
2019.  In English Pronunciation Teaching and Research,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Sánchez-Alvarado, Covadonga, Alba Arias, Eduardo García Fernández, Isaac McAlister & Meghan E. Armstrong
2018.  In Contemporary Trends in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 15],  pp. 281 ff. Crossref logo
Sánchez-Mompeán, Sofía
2019.  In Reassessing Dubbing [Benjamins Translation Library, 148],  pp. 192 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 07 november 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.