Cover not available
Part of
Evaluation in Context
Edited by Geoff Thompson † and Laura Alba-Juez
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 242] 2014
► pp. 345–366

Evaluative phraseological choice and speaker party/gender

A corpus-assisted comparative study of ‘register-idiosyncratic’ meaning in Congressional debate

ORCID logo
This chapter continues investigation into register-idiosyncratic features of evaluation in parliamentary debate (Miller 2007; Miller and Johnson 2009, to appear), reporting findings regarding the phraseology it is * time to/for/that in a corpus of US congressional speech on the Iraq war. Quantitative data are tested for saliency against both general and political corpora. Qualitative analysis focuses on the enactment of APPRAISAL systems (Martin and White 2005). Methodology involves “shunting” (Halliday 2002 [1961]: 45), and a focus on “coupling” (Martin 2000: 163–164) which affords attitude (Martin and White 2005: 62 ff.; Miller and Johnson, to appear). The chapter examines how appraisers’ choices are affected by party/gender, recognizing that choice may transcend register boundaries due to both the ‘repertoire’ of the individual and his/her ideologically saturated ‘reservoir’ of culturally specific ways of meaning (Martin 2010: 23).
Published online: 4 February 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.242.17mil
References (61)
References
Adams, Karen. 1999. “Deliberate dispute and the construction of oppositional stance.” Pragmatics 9 (2): 231–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aston, Guy and Burnard, Lou. 1998. The BNC Handbook. Exploring the British National Corpus with SARA. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University PressGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. “Discourse in the novel.” In The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin, Michael Holquist (ed), Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist (trans.), 259–422. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bayley, Paul. 2007. “Terror in political discourse from the Cold War to the unipolar world.” In Discourse and Contemporary Social Change, Norman Fairclough, Giuseppina Cortese and Patrizia Ardizzone (eds), 49–71. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika. 2008. Emotion Talk across Corpora. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, Monika and Martin, James R. (eds). 2010. New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bevitori, Cinzia. 2007. “En gendering conflict? A corpus-assisted analysis of women MPs’ positioning on the war in Iraq.” In (Re)volutions in Evaluation, Marina Dossena and Andreas Jucker (eds), Textus XX (1): 137–158.Google Scholar
2010. “Gendered discourses on war at the intersection between party affiliation and institutional role: The case of legislative Assemblies.” Invited speech at Gender and Language – BAAL Special Interest Group, Gender and Corpus Linguistics Event, University of Lancaster, 30 March 2010.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 2009. “A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14 (3): 275–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas and Conrad, Susan. 1999. “Lexical bundles in conversation and academic prose.” In Out of Corpora, Hilde Hasselgard and Signe Oksefjell (eds), 181–190. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan and Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: PearsonGoogle Scholar
Burnard, Lou and Todd, Tony. Xaira 1.25 (current release), Oxford: OUCS.
Cheng, Winnie. 2004. “// ♦ FRIENDS // (& LAdies and GENtlemen //: Some preliminary findings from a corpus of spoken public discourse in China.” In Applied Corpus Linguistics: A Multidimensional Perspective, Ulla Connor and Thomas A. Upton (eds), 35–52. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coffin, Caroline and O’Halloran, Kieran. 2005. “Finding the global groove: Theorising and analysing dynamic reader positioning using appraisal, corpus and a concordance.” Critical Discourse Studies 2 (2): 143–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. “The role of appraisal and corpora in detecting covert evaluation.” Functions of Language 13 (1): 77–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. 1991. “Corpus studies and probabilistic grammar.” In English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik, Karin Aijmer and Bengt Altenberg (eds), 30–43. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
2002 [1961]. “Categories of the theory of grammar.” In On Grammar, Vol. 1 in The collected works of M. A. K. Halliday, Jonathan J. Webster (ed), 37–94. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday M.A.K. 2002 [1984]). “On the ineffability of grammatical categories.” In On Grammar, Vol. 1 in The collected works of M. A. K. Halliday, Jonathan J. Webster (ed), 291–322. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. 2002 [1985]. “Dimensions of discourse analysis: Grammar.” In On Grammar, Vol. 1 in The collected works of M. A. K. Halliday, Jonathan J. Webster (ed), 261–286. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2002 [1996]. “On grammar and grammatics.” In On Grammar , Vol. 1 in The collected works of M. A. K. Halliday, Jonathan J. Webster (ed), 384–417. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2007 [1960]. “Linguistics and its application to language teaching.” In Language and Education , Vol. 9 in The collected works of M. A. K. Halliday, Jonathan J. Webster (ed), 135–173. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. and Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M. 2004. Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd edition). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1984. “Ways of saying: ways of meaning.” In Language as Social Semiotic, Vol. 1, The Semiotics of Culture and Language, Robin P. Fawcett, M.A. K. Halliday, Sydney M. Lamb and Adam Makkai (eds), 105–162. London and Dover: Pinter.Google Scholar
Hunston Susan. 2003. “Lexis, wordform and complementation pattern. A corpus study.” Functions of Language 10 (1): 31–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunston, Susan. 2004. “Counting the uncountable: Problems of identifying evaluation in a text and in a corpus.” In Corpora and Discourse, Alan Partington, John Morley and Louann Haarman (eds), 157–188. Bern: Peter LangGoogle Scholar
Hunston, Susan and Francis, Gill. 2000. Pattern Grammar. A Corpus-Driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2008. “Academic clusters: text patterning in published and postgraduate writing.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 18 (1): 41–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knight, Naomi K. 2010. “Wrinkling complexity: Concepts of identity and affiliation in humour.” In New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation, Monika Bednarek and James R. Martin (eds), 35–58. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Knox, John S., Pattama Patpong and Yupaporn Piriyasilpa. 2010. “ Khao naa nung: A multimodal analysis of Thai-language newspaper front pages.” In New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation, Monika Bednarek and James R. Martin (eds), 80–110. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lemke, Jay L. 1990. “Technical discourse and technocratic ideology.” In Learning, Keeping and Using Language: Selected Papers from the 8th AILA World Congress of Applied Linguistics, Vol. II, M.A.K. Halliday, J. Gibbons and H. Nicholas (eds), 435–460. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marín Arrese, Juana I. 2011. “Stancetaking, dialogicality and inter/subjectivity: An alternative proposal for the analysis of the multifunctionality of Engagement resources.” Paper delivered to Int-Eval – International Workshop on the Evaluative Function of Language: Evaluation Across Text Types And Cultures, at the Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Madrid, 6-8 October.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. 2000. “Beyond exchange: APPRAISAL systems in English.” In Evaluation in Text, Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson (eds), 142–175. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2010. “Semantic variation: Modelling realisation, instantiation and individuation in social semiosis.” In New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation, Monica Bednarek and James R. Martin (eds), 1–34. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. and White, Peter R.R. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M. 1993. “Register in the Round.” In Register Analysis: Theory and Practice, Mohsen Ghadessy (ed) , 221–291. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Miller, Donna R. 1996. “ Ratio v. oratio, A critical excursion into the rhetoric of anti-rhetoric.” In Il discorso persuasivo, Quaderni Linguistici del Dipartimento di Scienze Politiche dell’Università di Trieste, n. 1, Donna R. Miller and Nicoletta Vasta (eds), 75–110. Padova: Cedam.Google Scholar
1999. “Meaning up for grabs: value-orientation patterns in British parliamentary debate on Europe.” In Language and Ideology: Selected Papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference, vol. I, Jeff Verschueren (ed), 386–404. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association.Google Scholar
2000. “On computing appraisal in a corpus of parliamentary debate, or, ticklish trawling.” Paper delivered to the Systemic Functional Linguistics European Conference and Workshop, Glasgow, 19-22 July.Google Scholar
2004. “‘Truth, justice and the American Way’: The APPRAISAL SYSTEM of JUDGEMENT in the U.S. House debate on the impeachment of the President, 1998.” In Cross-cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse, Paul Bayley (ed), 271–300. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. “From concordance to text: Appraising ‘giving’ in Alma Mater donation requests.” In System and Corpus: Exploring Connections, Geoff Thompson and Susan Hunston (eds), 248–268. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
2007. “Towards a typology of evaluation in parliamentary debate: From theory to practice – and back again.” In (Re)volutions in Evaluation, Marina Dossena and Andreas Jucker (eds), Textus XX (1): 159–180.Google Scholar
Miller, Donna R. and Johnson, Jane Helen. 2009. “Strict vs. nurturant parents? A corpus-assisted study of congressional positioning on the war in Iraq.” In Corpus Assisted Discourse Studies on the Iraq Conflict: Wording the War, John Morley and Paul Bayley (eds), 34 – 73. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2009. “Phraseological choice as ‘register-idiosyncratic’ evaluative meaning? A corpus-assisted comparative study of Congressional debate.” Paper delivered to the Corpus Linguistics Conference at The University of Liverpool, 21–23 July.Google Scholar
(to appear). “Formulaic choice as ‘register-idiosyncratic’ evaluative meaning? A corpus-assisted comparative study of Congressional debate.” In ‘Choice': Critical Considerations in Systemic Functional Linguistics, Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett and Gerald O’Grady (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Morley, John and Bayley, Paul (eds). 2009. Corpus Assisted Discourse Studies on the Iraq Conflict: Wording the War. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Murphy, Amanda. 2009. “Editorials and opinion articles in the CorDis corpus.” In Corpus Assisted Discourse Studies on the Iraq Conflict: Wording the War, John Morley and Paul Bayley (eds), 186–207. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Page, Ruth E. 2003. “An analysis of APPRAISAL in childbirth narratives with special consideration of gender and storytelling style.” Text 23 (2): 211–237.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partington, Alan. 2004. “Corpora and discourse, a most congruous beast.” In Corpora and Discourse, Alan Partington, John Morley and Louann Haarman (eds), 11–20. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2008. “The armchair and the machine: Corpus-assisted discourse research.” In Corpora for University Language Teachers, Carol Taylor Torsello, Katherine Ackerley, Erik Castello (eds), 189–213. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Partington, Alan and Morley, John. 2004. “At the heart of ideology: Word and cluster/bundle frequency in political debate.” In Practical Applications in Language and Computers, Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (ed), 179–192. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Scott, Michael. 2008. WordSmith Tools version 5, Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John. 1996. “The search for units of meaning.” Textus 9 (1): 75–106.Google Scholar
Slembrouck, Stef. 1992. “The parliamentary Hansard ‘verbatim’ report: The written construction of spoken discourse.” Languages and Literature 1 (2): 101–119.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff. 2001. “Corpus, comparison, culture: Doing the same things differently in different languages.” In The Use of Small Corpora in the Teaching of Language, Mohsen Ghadessy, Alex Henry and Robert L. Roseberry (eds), 311–334. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Reprinted in Corpus Linguistics: Critical Concepts in Linguistics. Vol. 5, Wolfgang Teubert and Ramesh Krishnamurthy (eds), 68–87. 2007. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2004. Introducing Functional Grammar (2 nd edition). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
2008. “Review of Monika Bednarek, Emotion Talk across Corpora.” Linguistics and the Human Sciences 3 (3): 399–404.Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff and Hunston, Susan (eds). 2006. System and Corpus: Exploring Connections. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Tucker, Gordon. 2006. “Between lexis and grammar: Towards a systemic functional approach to phraseology.” In Continuing Discourse on Language: A Functional Perspective, Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen, Ruqaiya Hasan and Jonathan J. Webster (eds), 953–977. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
White, Peter R.R. 2003. “Beyond modality and hedging: A dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance.” Text [special issue on Appraisal], 23 (2): 259–284.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele, Cléirigh, Chris, Dwyer, Paul and Martin, James R. 2010. “The coupling of gesture and phonology.” In New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation, Monika Bednarek and James R. Martin (eds), 219–236. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Zhao, Sumin. 2010. “Intersemiotic relations as logogenetic patterns: Towards the restoration of the time dimension in hypertext description.” In New Discourse on Language: Functional Perspectives on Multimodality, Identity, and Affiliation, Monika Bednarek and James R. Martin (eds), 195–218. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.