Part of
Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics
Edited by Irma Taavitsainen, Andreas H. Jucker and Jukka Tuominen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 243] 2014
► pp. 133154
References (33)
References
Corpora
C-ORAL-ROM: Integrated Reference Corpora for Spoken Romance Languages . 2005. Ed. by Emanuela Cresti, and Massimo Moneglia. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LIP = Lessico di frequenza dell’italiano parlato . 1993. Ed. by Tullio De Mauro, Federico Mancini, Massimo Vedovelli, and Miriam Voghera. Milano: ETASLibri.Google Scholar
LIZ = Letteratura Italiana Zanichelli , version 4.0. 2001. CD-ROM, ed. by Pasquale Stoppelli, and Eugenio Picchi. Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar
OVI = Opera del Vocabolario Italiano . 1965–. Tesoro della Lingua Italiana delle Origini . Firenze: Consiglio nazionale delle Ricerche/Accademia della Crusca. Online: [URL] .
Tutto La Stampa compact . 1996–1998. CD-ROM. Torino: La Stampa.Google Scholar
Secondary sources
Beeching, Kate. 2009. “Protocatalepsis and the Etymology of Hedging and Boosting Particles.” In Current Trends in Diachronic Semantics and Pragmatics , ed. by Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen, and Jacqueline Visconti, 81–105. Bingley: Emerald.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beltrami, Pietro G., and Andrea Boccellari. 2006. “Banche dati e dizionari on-line: Il Tesoro della Lingua Italiana delle Origini e la banca dati dell’italiano antico dell’ Opera del Vocabolario Italiano.” In Nuovi media e lessicografia storica: Atti del colloquio in occasione del settantesimo compleanno di Max Pfister , ed. by Wolfgang Schweickard, 3–14. Tübingen: Niemeyer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brems, Lieselotte, Lobke Ghesquière, and Freek Van de Velde (eds). 2012. Intersections of Intersubjectivity , special issue of English Text Construction 5 (1).Google Scholar
Caffi, Claudia. 2007. Mitigation . Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
D’Hondt, Ulrique, and Tine Defour. 2012. “At the Crossroads of Grammaticalization and Pragmaticalization: A Diachronic Cross-linguistic Case Study on Vraiment and Really.” Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 113 (2): 169–190.Google Scholar
De Cesare, Anna-Maria. 2002. Intensification, modalisation et focalisation: Les différents effets des adverbes proprio, davvero et veramente. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Defour, Tine. 2010. “The Semantic-pragmatic Development of Well from the Viewpoint of (Inter)subjectification.” In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization , ed. by Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte and Hubert Cuyckens, 155–195. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Detges, Ulrich. 2006. “From Speaker to Subject: The Obligatorization of the Old French Subject Pronouns.” In La linguistique au coeur: Valence verbale, grammaticalisation et corpus , ed. by Hanne Leth Andersen, Merete Birkelund, and Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen, 75–103. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark.Google Scholar
Fanego, Teresa. 2010. “Paths in the Development of Elaborative Discourse Markers: Evidence from Spanish.” In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization , ed. by Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte and Hubert Cuyckens, 197–237. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard, and Jacqueline Visconti. 2009. “Current Trends in Diachronic Semantics and Pragmatics.” In Current Trends in Diachronic Semantics and Pragmatics , ed. by Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen, and Jacqueline Visconti, 1–19. Bingley: Emerald.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Helbig, Gerhard, and Agnes Helbig. 1993. Lexikon deutscher Modalwörter . Berlin: Langenscheidt.Google Scholar
Held, Gudrun. 1988. “Italienisch: Partikelforschung/Particelle e modalità.” In Lexikon der Romanistischen Linguistik, vol. 4: Italienisch, Korsisch, Sardisch , ed. by Günter Holtus, Michael Metzeltin, and Christian Schmitt, 63–75. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees. 1989. “Layers and Operators in Functional Grammar.” Journal of Linguistics 25 (1): 127–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. 1997. “The Discourse Marker Well in the History of English.” English Language and Linguistics 1 (1): 91–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
López-Couso, María José. 2010. “Subjectification and Intersubjectification.” In Historical Pragmatics , ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, and Irma Taavitsainen, 127–163. Berlin/Boston, MA: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics , vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ramat, Paolo, and Davide Ricca. 1998. “Sentence Adverbs in the Languages of Europe.” In Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe , ed. by Johan van der Auwera, 187–275. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ricca, Davide. 2010. “Il sintagma avverbiale.” In Grammatica dell’italiano antico , ed. by Giampaolo Salvi, and Lorenzo Renzi, 715–754. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Somolinos, Amalia. 2011. “Assertion de la vérité et engagement du locuteur: L’évolution de voirement et de vraiment en français (XIIe-XVIIe siècle).” Langages 184: 91–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salvi, Giampaolo, and Lorenzo Renzi (eds). 2010. Grammatica dell’italiano antico . Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Smith, Sara W., and Andreas H. Jucker. 2000. Actually and Other Markers of an Apparent Discrepancy between Propositional Attitudes of Conversational Partners.” In Pragmatic Markers and Propositional Attitude , ed. by Gisle Andersen, and Thorstein Fretheim, 207–237. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, and Susan Fitzmaurice. 2007. “Historical Pragmatics: What It Is and How to Do It.” In Methods in Historical Pragmatics , ed. by Susan M. Fitzmaurice, and Irma Taavitsainen, 11–36. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, and Andreas H. Jucker. 2007. “Speech Act Verbs and Speech Acts in the History of English.” In Methods in Historical Pragmatics , ed. by Susan M. Fitzmaurice, and Irma Taavitsainen, 107–138. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2010a. “Dialogic Contexts as Motivations for Syntactic Change.” In Studies in the History of the English Language, vol. V: Variation and Change in English Grammar and Lexicon: Contemporary Approaches , ed. by Robert A. Cloutier, Anne-Marie Hamilton-Brehm, and William A. Kretzschmar, 11–27. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010b. “(Inter)subjectivity and (Inter)subjectification: A Reassessment.” In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization , ed. by Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte and Hubert Cuyckens, 29–71. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Intersubjectification and Clause Periphery.” English Text Construction 5 (1): 7–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, and Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Waltereit, Richard. 2006. “The Rise of Discourse Markers in Italian: A Specific Type of Language Change.” In Approaches to Discourse Particles , ed. by Kerstin Fischer, 61–76. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

De Cristofaro, Elisa, Linda Badan & Adriana Belletti
2024. Discourse markers in L1 and L2 Italian: A cartographic analysis of the sentence-internal position. Second Language Research 40:3  pp. 643 ff. DOI logo
Esteve Ramos, María José
2021. Chapter 11. “This ingenious hypothe∫is hath a great appearance of truth”. In “All families and genera”,  pp. 210 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.