A matter of tradition and good advice
Dialogue analysis and corpus pragmatics in Old Spanish texts
Based on a corpus of Old Spanish texts, the discourse traditions of counselling are analysed within the framework of diachronic corpus pragmatics and dialogue analysis. On a methodological level, the study distinguishes three types of pragmatics and offers a clear-cut distinction between language change and cultural changes in the realm of discourse traditions. In order to clearly define the different interaction patterns in these dialogues, the qualitative approach of traditional philology is combined with quantitative methods that extract lexical clusters which are typical of counselling dialogues. This combination proves to be fruitful in two ways: on the one hand, the philological interpretations have a strong explanatory power for the interpretation of the quantitative findings; on the other hand, corpus-driven quantitative methods have the merit of discovering “blind spots” of traditional hermeneutic interpretations.
References (56)
References
Corpus texts and tools
AntConc
(3.2.4u, Linux version). 2011. Computer software by Laurence Anthony. Tokyo: Waseda University. Online: [URL]
.
Cantar de mio Cid
. 1993. Edición, prólogo y notas de Alberto Montaner. 2nd ed. Barcelona: Crítica.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cantar de mio Cid
. 2013. Ed. by Matthew Bailey. University of Texas at Austin. Online: [URL]
.
Libro del Caballero Zifar
. 1990 (1982). Edición de Joaquín González Muela. Madrid: Clásicos Castalia.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Libro del Caballero Zifar
. Electronic text based on the edition by Joaquín González Muela, 1990. Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes. Online: [URL]
.
The Poem of My Cid
. 1991. Translated and with an Introduction and Commentary by Peter Such, and John Hodgkinson. 2nd ed. Warminster: Aris and Phillips.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Treecloud
(online version). 2007–2012. Computer software by Philippe Gambette, visualisation concept by Jean Véronis. Online: [URL]
.
Secondary sources
Althoff, Gerd. 1990. “Colloquium familiare – Colloquium secretum – Colloquium publicum: Beratung im politischen Leben des frühen Mittelalters.”
Frühmittelalterliche Studien
24: 145–167.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Amstutz, Delphine, and Philippe Gambette. 2010. “Utilisation de la visualisation en nuage arboré pour l’analyse littéraire.” In
JADT 2010: Statistical Analysis of Textual Data: Proceedings of 10th International Conference Journées d’Analyse statistique des Données Textuelles
, 9–11 June 2010 – Sapienza University of Rome, ed. by Sergio Bolasco, Isabella Chiari, and Luca Giuliano, 227–238. Milano: LED. Online: [URL]
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Andersen, Gisle. 2011. “Corpus-based Pragmatics I: Qualitative Studies.” In
Foundations of Pragmatics
, ed. by Wolfram Bublitz, and Neal R. Norrick, 587–627. Berlin/Boston, MA: De Gruyter Mouton.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bubenhofer, Noah. 2009.
Sprachgebrauchsmuster: Korpuslinguistik als Methode der Diskurs- und Kulturanalyse
. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coseriu, Eugenio. 1988.
Sprachkompetenz: Grundzüge der Theorie des Sprechens
. Tübingen: Francke.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Curtius, Ernst Robert. 1953.
Europäische Literatur und lateinisches Mittelalter
. 2nd ed. Tübingen/Basel: Francke.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Deist, Rosemarie. 2003.
Gender and Power: Counsellors and Their Masters in Antiquity and Medieval Courtly Romance
. Heidelberg: Winter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dunning, Ted. 1993. “Accurate Methods for the Statistics of Surprise and Coincidence.”
Computational Linguistics
19 (1): 61–74.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Felder, Ekkehard, Marcus Müller, and Friedemann Vogel. 2012. “Korpuspragmatik: Paradigma zwischen Handlung, Gesellschaft und Kognition.” In
Korpuspragmatik: Thematische Korpora als Basis diskurslinguistischer Analysen
, ed. by Ekkehard Felder, Marcus Müller, and Friedemann Vogel, 3–30. Berlin/Boston, MA: De Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fetzer, Anita. 2011. “Pragmatics as a Linguistic Concept.” In
Foundations of Pragmatics
, ed. by Wolfram Bublitz, and Neal R. Norrick, 23–50. Berlin/Boston, MA: De Gruyter Mouton.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fleischman, Suzanne. 2000. “Methodologies and Ideologies in Historical Linguistics: On Working with Older Languages.” In
Textual Parameters in Older Languages
, ed. by Susan C. Herring, Pieter van Reenen, and Lene Schøsler, 33–58. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fritz, Gerd. 1995. “Topics in the History of Dialogue Forms.” In
Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English
, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, 469–498. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gambette, Philippe, and Jean Véronis. 2010. “Visualising a Text with a Tree Cloud.” In
Classification as a Tool for Research: Proceedings of the 11th IFCS Biennial Conference and 33rd Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation e.V.
, Dresden, March 13–18, 2009, ed. by Hermann Locarek-Junge, and Claus Weihs, 561–570. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. Online: [URL]
.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grzybek, Peter. 2007. “Semiotik und Phraseologie.” In
Phraseologie: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung
, ed. by Harald Burger, Dmitrij Dobrovol’skij, Peter Kühn, and Neal R. Norrick, 188–208. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harney, Michael. 1993.
Kinship and Polity in the “Poema de mio Cid”
. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hindelang, Götz. 1977. “Jemanden um Rat fragen.”
Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik
5 (1): 34–44. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacob, Daniel, and Johannes Kabatek (eds). 2001.
Lengua medieval y tradiciones discursivas en la Península Ibérica: Descripción gramatical – pragmática histórica – metodología
. Frankfurt am Main/Madrid: Vervuert.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacobs, Andreas, and Andreas H. Jucker. 1995. “The Historical Perspective in Pragmatics.” In
Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English
, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, 3–33. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kallmeyer, Werner. 1985. “Handlungskonstitution im Gespräch: Dupont und sein Experte führen ein Beratungsgespräch.” In
Grammatik, Konversation, Interaktion
, ed. by Elisabeth Gülich, and Thomas Kotschi, 81–122. Tübingen: Niemeyer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kallmeyer, Werner. 2000. “Beraten und Betreuen: Zur gesprächsanalytischen Untersuchung von helfenden Interaktionen.”
Zeitschrift für qualitative Bildungs-, Beratungs- und Sozialforschung
1 (2): 227–252.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koch, Peter. 1997. “Diskurstraditionen: Zu ihrem sprachtheoretischen Status und zu ihrer Dynamik.” In
Gattungen mittelalterlicher Schriftlichkeit
, ed. by Barbara Frank, Thomas Haye, and Doris Tophinke, 43–79. Tübingen: Narr.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kytö, Merja. 2010. “Data in Historical Pragmatics.” In
Historical Pragmatics
, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, and Irma Taavitsainen, 33–67. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lebsanft, Franz. 2005. “Kommunikationsprinzipien, Texttraditionen, Geschichte.” In
Historische Pragmatik und historische Varietätenlinguistik in den romanischen Sprachen
, ed. by Angela Schrott, and Harald Völker, 25–44. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leech, Geoffrey N. 1983.
Principles of Pragmatics
. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Locher, Miriam A., and Holger Limberg. 2012. “Introduction to Advice in Discourse.” In
Advice in Discourse
, ed. by Holger Limberg, and Miriam A. Locher, 1–27. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Manning, Christopher D., and Hinrich Schütze. 1999.
Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing
. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marcos Marín, Francisco. 1992. “Spanisch: Periodisierung/Periodización.” In
Lexikon der Romanistischen Linguistik, vol. VI/1: Aragonesisch/Navarresisch, Spanisch, Asturianisch/Leonesisch
, ed. by Günter Holtus, Michael Metzeltin, and Christian Schmitt, 602–607. Tübingen: Niemeyer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Milfull, Inge B. 2004. “Advice: Performative Expression in Middle Scots.” In
Anglistentag 2003: Proceedings
, ed. by Christoph Bode, Sebastian Domsch, and Hans Sauer, 57–70. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Piccus, Jules. 1962. “Consejos y consejeros en el Libro del Cauallero Zifar.”
Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica
16: 16–30.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rayson, Paul, and Roger Garside. 2000. “Comparing Corpora Using Frequency Profiling.” In
Proceedings of the Workshop on Comparing Corpora, Held in Conjunction with the 38th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2000)
, ed. by Adam Kilgarriff, and Tony Berber Sardinha, 1–6. New Brunswick, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ridruejo, Emilio. 2002. “Para un programa de pragmática histórica del español.” In
Actas del V Congreso Internacional de Historia de la Lengua Española
, ed. by María Teresa Echenique Elizondo, and Juan P. Sánchez Méndez, 159–177. Madrid: Gredos.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rieger, Dietmar. 1998. “‘E trait sos meillors omes ab un consel’: Émotion, mise en scène et ‘consilium’ féodal dans Girart de Roussillon.”
Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie
114 (4): 628–650. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scharloth, Joachim, and Noah Bubenhofer. 2012. “Datengeleitete Korpuspragmatik: Korpusvergleich als Methode der Stilanalyse.” In
Korpuspragmatik: Thematische Korpora als Basis diskurslinguistischer Analysen
, ed. by Ekkehard Felder, Marcus Müller, and Friedemann Vogel, 195–230. Berlin/Boston, MA: De Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schrott, Angela. 2006.
Fragen und Antworten in historischen Kontexten: Ein Beitrag zur historischen Dialoganalyse und zur historischen Pragmatik am Beispiel altspanischer literarischer Texte
. Habilitationsschrift, Ruhr-Universität Bochum.
Schrott, Angela. 2011. “Von der Lebendigkeit der Heiligenleben: Traditionen der Dialoggestaltung bei Gonzalo de Berceo.” In
Redeszenen in der mittelalterlichen Großepik: Komparatistische Perspektiven
, ed. by Monika Unzeitig, Nine Miedema, and Franz Hundsnurscher, 193–212. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schrott, Angela. Forthcoming. “Consejos y consejeros: Tradiciones del consejo como secuencia ilocutiva en textos medievales.” In
Actas del XXVI Congreso Internacional de Lingüística y Filología Románicas
(Valencia, 6–11 September 2010), ed. by E. Casanova Herrero, and C. Calvo Rigual. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.
Schrott, Angela, and Harald Völker. 2005. “Historische Pragmatik und historische Varietätenlinguistik: Traditionen, Methoden und Modelle in der Romanistik.” In
Historische Pragmatik und historische Varietätenlinguistik in den romanischen Sprachen
, ed. by Angela Schrott, and Harald Völker, 1–22. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Searle, John R. 1969.
Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stubbs, Michael. 2010. “Three Concepts of Keywords.” In
Keyness in Texts
, ed. by Marina Bondi, and Mike Scott, 21–42. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taavitsainen, Irma, and Susan Fitzmaurice. 2007. “Historical Pragmatics: What It Is and How to Do It.” In
Methods in Historical Pragmatics
, ed. by Susan M. Fitzmaurice, and Irma Taavitsainen, 11–36. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taavitsainen, Irma, and Andreas H. Jucker. 2010. “Trends and Developments in Historical Pragmatics.” In
Historical Pragmatics
, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, and Irma Taavitsainen, 3–30. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Verschueren, Jef. 1995. “The Pragmatic Perspective.” In
Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual
, ed. by Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, and Jan Blommaert, 1–19. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Verschueren, Jef. 1999.
Understanding Pragmatics
. London: Arnold.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wynne, Martin. 2008. “Searching and Concordancing.” In
Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook
, vol. 1, ed. by Anke Lüdeling, and Merja Kytö, 706–737. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Jucker, Andreas H.
2018.
Historische Pragmatik. In
Handbuch Pragmatik,
► pp. 132 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.