Despite the idiosyncratic properties of null-complement phenomena observed by Fillmore (1986), Lambrecht and Lemoine (2005), and others, many researchers have pursued large-scope, single-factor explanations of the distributional and interpretive restrictions on null complements – in particular, explanations based on Aktionsart (Rappaport Hovav and Levin 1998) and selectional restrictions (Resnik 1993, 1996). We argue instead for a limited implicational regularity tying the interpretation type of an omitted argument to the frame membership of its predicator. We show that our account is robust, that exceptions can be explained based on independently motivated principles, and that the proposed generalization can be motivated by reference to the discourse status of comparable overt arguments in both lexically and constructionally licensed omissions. Finally, we argue that successful generalizations in the realm of null complementation are likely to be narrow rather than broad in scope.
Brisson, Christine. 1994. “The Licensing of Unexpressed Objects in English Verbs.”CLS 30: 90–102.
Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. “The Case for Case.” In Universals in Linguistic Theory, ed. by Emmon Bach and Robert Harms, 1–88. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Fillmore, Charles J. 1982. “Frame Semantics.” In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, ed. by the Linguistic Society of Korea, 111–138. Hanshin, Seoul.
Fillmore, Charles J. 1985. “Frames and the Semantics of Understanding.”Quaderni di Semantica 6: 222–254.
Fillmore, Charles J. 1986. “Pragmatically Controlled Zero Anaphora.”BLS 12: 95–107.
Gillon, Brendan. 2012. “Implicit Complements: A Dilemma for Model-Theoretic S emantics.”Linguistics and Philosophy 35: 313–359. .
Goldberg, Adele. 2005. “Constructions, Lexical Semantics and the Correspondence Principle: Accounting for Generalizations and Subregularities in the Realization of Arguments.” In The Syntax of Aspect, ed. by Nomi Erteschik-Shir and Tova Rapoport, 212–236. Oxford: Oxford University Press. .
Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions at Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, Adele, and Farrell Ackerman. 2001. “The Pragmatics of Obligatory Adjuncts.”Language 77: 798–814. .
Gruber, Jeffrey. 1965. Studies in Lexical Relations. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T dissertation. Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg, and Ron Zacharski. 1993. “Referring Expressions in Discourse.”Language 69: 274–307.
Ioup, Georgette. 1975. “Some Universals of Quantifier Scope.” In Syntax and Semantics, vol. 4, ed. by John Kimball, 37–58. New York: Academic Press.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1997. The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lambrecht, Knud. 1995. “The Pragmatics of Case.” In Essays in Semantics and Pragmatics, ed. by Masayoshi Shibatani and Sandra A. Thompson, 145–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Michaelis, Laura A., and Hartwell S. Francis. 2007. “Lexical Subjects and the Conflation Strategy.” In Topics in the Grammar-Pragmatics Interface: Papers in Honor of Jeanette K. Gundel, ed. by Nancy Hedberg and Ronald Zacharski, 19–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mittwoch, Anita. 2005. “Unspecified Arguments in Episodic and Habitual Sentences.” In The Syntax of Aspect, ed. by Nomi Erteschik-Shir and Tova Rapoport, 237–254. Oxford: Oxford University Press. .
Rappaport Hovav, Malka, and Beth Levin. 1998. “Building Verb Meanings”. In The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors, ed. by Miriam Butt and Wilhelm Geuder, 97–134. Stanford: CSLI.
Resnik, Philip. 1993. Selection and Information: A Class-based Approach to Lexical Relationships. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.
Resnik, Philip. 1996. “Selectional Constraints: An Information-theoretic Model and its Computational Realization.”Cognition 61: 127–59. .
Ruppenhofer, Josef, 2004. The Interaction of Valence and Information Structure. Berkeley: University of California dissertation.
Ruppenhofer, Josef, Michael Ellsworth, R.L. MiriamPetruck, ChristopherR. Johnson, and Jan Scheffczyk. 2006. Frame Net II: Extended Theory and Practice. Berkeley, CA: ICSI. [URL].
Wright, Saundra, and Beth Levin. 2000. “Unspecified Object Contexts with Activity and Change of State Verbs.” Paper presented at the LSA Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL
Cited by (10)
Cited by ten other publications
Kim, Jong-Bok & Jeffrey T. Runner
2022. Pseudogapping in English: a direct interpretation approach. The Linguistic Review 39:3 ► pp. 457 ff.
NYKIEL, JOANNA & JONG-BOK KIM
2022. Fragments and structural identity on a direct interpretation approach. Journal of Linguistics 58:1 ► pp. 73 ff.
Ebeling, Signe Oksefjell
2021. To Score or to Score a Goal: Transitivity in Football Match Reports. English Studies 102:2 ► pp. 243 ff.
Isingoma, Bebwa
2021. Implicit Arguments in Ugandan English. English Studies at NBU 7:2 ► pp. 147 ff.
Boas, Hans C.
2020. Constructions in English Grammar. In The Handbook of English Linguistics, ► pp. 277 ff.
EU, JINSEUNG
2018. On the nature of object omission: indefiniteness as indeterminacy. English Language and Linguistics 22:3 ► pp. 523 ff.
Ruppenhofer, Josef & Laura A. Michaelis
2016. Frames, polarity and causation. Corpora 11:2 ► pp. 259 ff.
Michaelis, Laura A.
2015. Constructions License Verb Frames. In Perspectives on Complementation, ► pp. 7 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.