Cover not available
Part of
The Functional Perspective on Language and Discourse: Applications and implications
Edited by María de los Ángeles Gómez González, Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco Gonzálvez-García and Angela Downing
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 247] 2014
► pp. 19–36

Developing comprehensive criteria of adequacy

The challenge of hybridity

Butler (2009a, b) argues that an adequate model of the language system should accommodate cognitive, sociocultural, discoursal, acquisitional, typological and diachronic dimensions, and observational evidence from corpora, experiments and intuition. This paper asks if such reconciliation is possible. It argues that language is composed of accreted subsystems that render the linguistic system inherently complex in each dimension. This hybridity explains the difficulty in constructing Butler’s macro-model, but also indicates how it might be done. Subsystems that add complexity in one dimension are often explained by another, e.g. sub-patterns for English plural formation arose for sociocultural reasons (Classical borrowing); typological exception groups (e.g. Director General) have a diachronic explanation. Thus, future modelling will benefit from the flexibility to cross-refer between dimensions.

Published online: 16 May 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.247.02wra
References
Antia, Bassey E
2007a “Introduction. LSP Studies: Factoring in Indeterminacy.” In Indeterminacy in terminology and LSP , ed. by Bassey E. Antia, xiii–xxii. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed) 2007b  Indeterminacy in Terminology and LSP . Amsterdam: John ­Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark
1976  Word Formation in Generative Grammar . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1976 “Meaning and memory. ” Forum Linguisticum 1: 1–14.Google Scholar
Butler, Christopher S
2009a “The Lexical Constructional Model: Genesis, Strengths and Challenges.” In Deconstructing constructions , ed. by Christopher S. Butler, and Javier Martín Arista, 117–151. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009b “Criteria of Adequacy in Functional Linguistics. ” Folia Linguistica 43 (1): 1–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carrier, David
2000  The Aesthetics of Comics . University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew
1994 “Inflection Classes, Gender, and the Principle of Contrast. ” Language 70: 737–788. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Winnie, Chris Greaves, John McH Sinclair, and Martin Warren
2009 “Uncovering the Extent of the Phraseological Tendency: Towards a Systematic Analysis of Concgrams. ” Applied Linguistics 30 (2): 236–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam A
1957  Syntactic Structures . The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Corson, David
1995  Using English Words . Dortrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay, and Mary C. O’Connor
1988 “Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of “Let Alone”. ” Language 64 (3): 501–538. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson
2003 “Social Interaction and Grammar.” In The New Psychology of Language (vol 2: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure) , ed. by Michael Tomasello, 119–144. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gazdar, Gerald
1980 “Pragmatics and Logical Form. ” Journal of Pragmatics 4 (1): 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grace, George W
2002 “Collateral Damage from Linguistics? 3: The Role of Culture-centrism.” Ethnolinguistic Notes 4: 23. Available at: [URL].Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K
1987/2003 “Language and the Order of Nature.” In The Linguistics of Writing: Arguments between Language and Literature , ed. by Colin MacCabe, Nigel Fabb, Derek Attridge, and Alan Durant, 135–154. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Reprinted in Halliday, Michael A. K. (2003) (ed. J. Webster). On Language and Linguistics, 116–138. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hanks, Patrick
2013  Lexical Analysis: Norms and Exploitations . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hurford, James R
2007  The Origins of Meaning . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kalmár, Ivan
1985 “Are there really no primitive languages?” In Literacy, Language and Learning: The Nature and Consequences of Reading and Writing , ed. by David R. Olson, Nancy Torrance, and Angela Hildyard, 148–166. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger
1990 “How to Do Things with Junk: Exaptation in Language Evolution. ” Journal of Linguistics 26: 79–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linell, Per
1982  The Written Language Bias in Linguistics . Linköping: University of Linköping.Google Scholar
Olson, David R
1977 “From Utterance to Text: The Bias of Language in Speech and Writing. ” Harvard Educational Review 47 (3): 257–281.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey
1998 Review of “From Grammar to Science: New Foundations for General Linguistics” by Victor H. Yngve. Computational Linguistics 24 (1): 173–176.Google Scholar
Sánchez-Martínez, Felipe, Forcada, Mikel L., and Andy Way
2009 “Hybrid Rule-based – ­Example-based MT: Feeding Apertium with Sub-sentential Translation Units.” In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Example-Based Machine Translation, Dublin, 11–18. Available at: [URL].
Thurston, William R
1989 “How Exoteric Languages Build a Lexicon: Esoterogeny in West New Britain.” In VICAL 1: Oceanic Languages. Papers from the Fifth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, Auckland, New Zealand, January 1988, ed. by Ray Harlow, and Robin Hooper, 555–579. Auckland: Linguistic Society of New Zealand.Google Scholar
Tiramulesh, K. V
1991 “Why You Can’t Repunch Bill: An Inquiry into the Pragmatics of “Re-words” in English. ” Journal of Pragmatics 16: 249–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
2011  Sociolinguistic Typology: Social Determinants of Linguistic Complexity . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wray, Alison
2002  Formulaic Language and the Lexicon . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008a  Formulaic Language: Pushing the Boundaries . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2008b “The Puzzle of Language Learning: From Child’s Play to ‘Linguaphobia’. ” Language Teaching 41 (2): 255–273.Google Scholar
Wray, Alison, Stephen Cox, Michael Lincoln, and Judy Tryggvason
2004 “A Formulaic Approach to Translation at the Post Office: Reading the Signs. ” Language and Communication 24 (1): 59–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wray, Alison, and George W. Grace
2007 “The Consequences of Talking to Strangers: Evolutionary Corollaries of Socio-cultural Influences on Linguistic Form.” Lingua 117 (3): 543–578 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Butler, Christopher S.
2019. Does functional linguistics have a ‘fundamental unity’?. Functions of Language 26:1 ► pp. 64 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.