Article published in:
The Functional Perspective on Language and Discourse: Applications and implications
Edited by María de los Ángeles Gómez González, Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco Gonzálvez-García and Angela Downing
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 247] 2014
► pp. 57–86

Contrastive corpus annotation in the CONTRANOT project

Issues and problems

| Complutense University of Madrid, Spain
| Complutense University of Madrid, Spain
| Complutense University of Madrid, Spain
| Complutense University of Madrid, Spain
| Complutense University of Madrid, Spain
In this paper we outline a number of issues and problems which arise during the process of contrastive human-coded corpus annotation of certain semantic and discourse categories within the framework of the CONTRANOT project, aimed at the creation and validation of contrastive functional descriptions through corpus analysis and annotation. Human-coded corpus annotation is a preliminary step for the training of computer algorithms which allow the automation of the annotation of large corpora, but it can also serve as a mechanism for testing aspects of linguistic theories empirically, such as theory formation and theory-redefinition, as well as enriching theories with quantitative information. The work reported in this paper focuses on the annotation of the category of Thematisation, on the one hand, and on Modality, on the other, to illustrate the challenges researchers have to face when confronted with the task of developing well-designed and reliable annotation procedures for complex linguistic phenomena in a contrastive manner. We describe the annotation tasks and procedures developed so far, which include the design of annotation schemas on the basis of available linguistic theories and the testing of their reliability through agreement studies. We also evaluate and discuss the results of the annotations on the basis of their relevance for the theoretical characterisation of the investigated phenomena. We expect that our work will have an impact in the area of contrastive textual analysis, and that it will pave the way for the development of automated annotation systems for computational applications.
Published online: 16 May 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.247.04lav
References
Arús, Jorge, Julia Lavid, and Lara Moratón
2012 “Annotating Thematic Features in English and Spanish: A Contrastive Corpus-based Study. ” Linguistics and the Human Sciences 6: 173–192.Google Scholar
Carretero, Marta, and Juan Rafael Zamorano-Mansilla
2010 “Annotating English and Spanish corpora for the categories of epistemic and deontic modality.” Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Modality in English. Madrid, Universidad Complutense, 9–11 September.
Carretero, Marta, and Maite Taboada
In press. “The Annotation of Appraisal: How Attitude and Epistemic Modality Overlap in English and Spanish Consumer Reviews.” In Thinking Modally: English and Contrastive Studies on Modality ed. by Juan Rafael Zamorano-Mansilla, E. Domínguez-Romero, C. Maíz-Arévalo, and M. V. Martín de la Rosa Bern Peter Lang
Collins, Peter
2009  Modals and Quasi–modals in English . Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Hermerén, Lars
1978  On Modality in English: the Study of the Semantics of the Modals . Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Hovy, Eduard, and Julia Lavid
2010 “Towards a Science of Corpus Annotation: A New Methodological Challenges for Corpus Linguistics. ” International Journal of Translation 22 (1): 13–36.Google Scholar
Lavid, Julia
2012 “Corpus Analysis and Annotation in CONTRANOT: Linguistic and Methodological Challenges.” In Encoding the Past, Decoding the Future: Corpora in the 21st Century , ed. by Isabel Moskowich, and Begoña Crespo, 205–220. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars. Google Scholar
Lavid, Julia, Jorge Arús, and Juan Rafael Zamorano-Mansilla
2010  Systemic Functional Grammar of Spanish: A Contrastive Study with English . London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lavid, Julia, Jorge Arús, and Lara Moratón
2010a “Towards an Annotated English–­­Spanish Corpus with SFL–based Textual Features.” Paper presented at the 37th International ­Systemic–Functional Congress. Vancouver, Canada.
2010b “Investigating Thematic Meaning in English and Spanish: A Methodological Proposal.” Paper presented at the 22nd European Systemic–Functional Linguistics Conference and Workshop. University of Primorska (Koper, ­Eslovenia). To be published in G. O’Grady, et al. (eds.). Choice in Language: Applications in Text Analysis . London: Equinox.Google Scholar
McEnery, Anthony, R. Xiao, and Y. Tono
2006  Corpus-based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book . New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan
2001  Epistemic Modality, Language and Conceptualisation: A Cognitive–Pragmatic Perspective . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Frank R
1990  Modality and the English Modals . London: Longman.Google Scholar
Perkins, Michael R
1983  Modal Expressions in English . London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
Reidsma, Dennis, and Jean Carletta
2008 “Reliability Measurement without Limits. ” Computational Linguistics 34 (3): 319–326. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silva–Corvalán, Carmen
1995 “Contextual Conditions for the Interpretation of ‘Poder’ and ‘Deber’ in Spanish.” In Modality in Grammar and Discourse , ed. by Joan Bybee, and Suzanne Fleischman, 67–105. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taboada, Maite and Marta Carretero
2012 “Labelling Evaluative Language in English and Spanish: The Case of Attitude in Consumer Reviews.” Linguistics and the Human Sciences 6: 275–295 . CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wärnsby, Anna
2006  (De)coding Modality. The Case of Must, May, Måste and Kan . (Lund Studies in English, 113). Lund: Lund University.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Lavid, Julia, Jorge Arús, Bernard DeClerck & Veronique Hoste
2015. Creation of a High-quality, Register-diversified Parallel (English-Spanish) Corpus for Linguistic and Computational Investigations. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 198 ► pp. 249 ff. Crossref logo
López, Julia Lavid
2019.  In Parallel Corpora for Contrastive and Translation Studies [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 90], ► pp. 159 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 may 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.