Cover not available
Part of
The Functional Perspective on Language and Discourse: Applications and implications
Edited by María de los Ángeles Gómez González, Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco Gonzálvez-García and Angela Downing
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 247] 2014
► pp. 243–260

Searle and Sinclair on communicative acts

A sketch of a research problem

| University of Trier, Germany

John Searle and John Sinclair have worked in very different academic traditions: analytic philosophy and empirical linguistics. Nevertheless, although they work with very different methodological and theoretical assumptions, they both tackle one of the deepest questions in the philosophy of language – the nature of units of meaning – and there are similarities in their models of communicative acts – speech acts and extended lexical units. It is therefore productive to study in how far the two approaches are complementary, and whether their different strengths can be combined. I will give brief examples of how Searle’s model could be strengthened by grounding it in empirical textual and ethnographic data, and therefore – conversely – how Sinclair’s model could be strengthened by giving it a social rationale.

Published online: 16 May 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.247.13stu
References
Austin, John L
1962  How to Do Things with Words . Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Simon
2010 “Review of John Searle Making the Social World. New Republic On-line Review .” [URL]. [Last accessed January 2012.]Google Scholar
Channell, Joanna
2000 “Corpus-based Analysis of Evaluative Lexis.” In Evaluation in Text , ed. by Susan Hunston and Geoffrey Thompson, 38–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Francis, Gill
1993 “A Corpus-driven Approach to Grammar.” In Text and Technology , ed. by Mona Baker, Gill Francis and Elena Tognini-Bonelli, 137–156. Amsterdam: John ­Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gazdar, Gerald
1979  Pragmatics . New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C
1983  Pragmatics . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pawley, Andrew and Frances H. Syder
1983 “Two Puzzles for Linguistic Theory.” In Language and Communication , ed. by Jack C. Richards and Richard W. Schmidt, 191–226. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl R
1994  The Myth of the Framework . London. Routledge.Google Scholar
Searle, John R
1965 “What Is a Speech Act?” In Philosophy in America , ed. by Max Black, 221–239. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
1969  Speech Acts . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1975a “Indirect Speech Acts.” In Syntax and Semantics, Vol 3: Speech Acts , ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 59–82. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1975b “A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts.” In Language, Mind and Knowledge , ed. by Keith Gunderson, 344–369. Minneapolis: University of Minesota Press. [Republished in several other places.]Google Scholar
1995  The Construction of Social Reality . London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
2005 “What Is an Institution?”. Available online at: [URL]. [URL]
2010a  The Making of the Social World . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2010b “Is Just Thinking Enough?” New York Review of Books , 11. November 2010.Google Scholar
n.d.) “Interview with John Searle by Julian Moore.” [URL]. [Last accessed January 2012.]
Sinclair, John McH
1966 “Indescribable English.” Summary in John McH. Sinclair and R. ­Malcolm Coulthard. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse , 151. London: Oxford ­University Press.Google Scholar
1991  Corpus, Concordance, Collocation . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1996 “The Search for Units of Meaning. ” Textus 9 (1): 75–106.Google Scholar
1998 “The Lexical Item.” In Contrastive Lexical Semantics , ed. by Edda Weigand, 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004  Trust the Text . London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2005 “The Phrase, the Whole Phrase and Nothing but the Phrase.” Plenary lecture, Phraseology 2005, Louvain-la-Neuve, October 2005.Google Scholar
2007 “Introduction.” In Michael Hoey, Michaela Mahlberg, Michael Stubbs and Wolfgang Teubert. Text, Discourse and Corpora , 1–5. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2008 “Borrowed Ideas.” In Language, People, Numbers , ed. by Andrea ­Gerbig, and Oliver Mason, 21–42. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John McH. and R. Malcolm Coulthard
1975  Towards an Analysis of Discourse . London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John McH., Susan Jones and Robert Daley
1970/2004  English Collocation Studies. The OSTI Report , ed. by Ramesh Krishnamurthy. London: Continuum. [Original mimeo report 1970, edited version published 2004.]Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael
2007 “Quantitative Data on Multi-word Sequences in English: The Case of the Word World.”In Michael Hoey, Michaela Mahlberg, Michael Stubbs and Wolfgang Teubert. Text, Discourse and Corpora , 163–189. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2009 “The Search for Units of Meaning: Sinclair on Empirical Semantics. ” Applied Linguistics 30 (1): 115–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Sequence and Order: The Neo-Firthian Tradition of Corpus Semantics.” In Corpus Perspectives on Patterns of Lexis , ed. by H. Hasselgård, J. Ebeling and S. Oksefjell, 13–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Su, Hang & Naixing Wei
2018. “I’m really sorry about what I said”. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 28:3 ► pp. 439 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.