Representing inequality in language
Words as social categorizers of experience
Using large, computerized corpora, this study aims to provide lexico-grammatical evidence for patterns or constructions in language pertaining to domains such as “power”, “dominance”, “inequality” or “status”. The study will specifically focus on the verbal uses of brook and countenance, lemmas that are pivotal to the domains in question and whose semantic and pragmatic meanings will be associated with discourses of inequality and supremacy, subordination and authorization. The verbal lemmas will turn out less as markers of energy transfer (as might be expected from the prototypical constructional meaning of transitive clauses in which they ordinarily occur) than as markers of perceived social implications, with a clear focus on the constructing and representational nature of their uses. In addition to offering a contribution to language-dependent “dominance”, “inequality”, “power”, “status” research, this paper will also demonstrate the indispensable use of corpus-linguistic methods within a predominantly functional framework (drawing its main inspirations from current research in neo-Firthian linguistics, Frame Semantics and Cognitive Linguistics in particular).
References (41)
References
Atkins, Sue, Charles J. Fillmore, and Christopher R. Johnson. 2003. “Lexicographic Relevance: Selecting Information from Corpus Evidence.” International Journal of Lexicography16(3): 251–280. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bartlett, Tom. 2012. Analysing Power in Language. A Practical Guide. London and New York: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Becker, Howard S. (ed). 1964. The Other Side: Perspectives on Deviance. New York: The Free Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cameron, Deborah. 2001. Working with Spoken Discourse. London: Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cole, David R., and Linda J. Graham (eds). 2012. The Power in/of Language. Oxford:
Wiley-Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clear, Jeremy. 1993. “From Firth Principles: Computational Tools for the Study of Collocation.” In Text and Technology. In Honour of John Sinclair, ed. by Mona Baker, Gill Francis, and Elena Tognini-Bonelli, 271–292. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Conley, John M., and William M. O’Barr. 1998. Just Words. Law, Language, and Power. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coupland, Nikolas. 2001. “Age in Social and Sociolinguistic Theory.” In Sociolinguistics and Social Theory, ed. by Nikolas Coupland, Srikant Sarangi and Chistopher N. Candlin, 185–211. Harlow, UK: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Facchinetti, Roberta (ed). 2012. English Dictionaries as Cultural Mines. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak. 1997. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Discourse as Social Interaction. Discourse Studies, vol. 2, ed. by Teun van Dijk, 258–284. Thousand Oaks, CA, London and New Delhi: Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fiedler, Klaus, and Peter Freytag. 2009. “Attribution Theories Wired into Linguistic Categories.” In Language and Social Cognition. Expression of the Social Mind, ed. by Hanna Pishwa, 349–369. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, Charles J. 1982. “Frame Semantics.” In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, ed. by The Linguistic Society of Korea, 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Firth, John Rupert. 1957. “The Technique of Semantics.” In Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951, John Rupert Firth, 7–33. London: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Foucault, Michel. 1966. Les mots et les choses. Une archéologie des sciences humaines. Paris:
Gallimard.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Foucault, Michel. 1969. L’archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Foucault, Michel. 1971. L’ordre du discours. Paris: Gallimard.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goffman, Erving. 1961. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, Adele E. 2011. “Meaning Arises from Words, Context, and Phrasal Constructions.” Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik59(4): 317–329. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gumperz, John J. 1986. “Interactional Sociolinguistics in the Study of Schooling.” In The Social Construction of Literacy, ed. by Jenny Cook-Gumperz, 45–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd ed.London: Arnold.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jaworski, Adam, and Nikolas Coupland. 2006. “Introduction. Perspectives on Discourse Analysis.” In The Discourse Reader, ed. by Adam Jaworski, and Nikolas Coupland, 1–37. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lindquist, Hans. 2009. Corpus Linguistics and the Description of English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Louw, Bill. 1993. “Irony in the Text or Insincerity in the Writer? – The Diagnostic Potential of Semantic Prosodies.” In Text and Technology. In Honour of John Sinclair, ed. by Mona Baker, Gill Francis, and Elena Tognini-Bonelli, 157–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mead, George Herbert. 1934. Mind, Self and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Poynton, Cate. 1989. Language and Gender: Making the Difference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reddy, Michael J. 1979. “The Conduit Metaphor – A Case of Frame Conflict in Our Language about Language.” In Metaphor and Thought, ed. by A. Ortony, 284–324. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Simpson, Paul, and Andrea Mayr. 2010. Language and Power: A Resourcebook for Students. London and New York: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sinclair, John. 1996a. “The Empty Lexicon.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics1(1): 99–119. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sinclair, John. 1996b. “The Search for Units of Meaning.” TextusIX: 75–106.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stewart, Dominic. 2010. Semantic Prosody: A Critical Evaluation. London and New York: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stubbs, Michael. 2001. Words and Phrases. Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. Oxford and Malden, MA: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Talmy, Leonard. 1988. “Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition.” Cognitive Science12: 49–100. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Williams, Raymond. 1976. Keywords. A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. London: Fontana.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilson, Steven R. 2002. Seeking and Resisting Compliance: Why People Say What They Do When Trying to Influence Others. Thousand Oaks, CA, London and New Delhi: Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wodak, Ruth. 2005. “Sprache und Politik – Sprache in der Politik – Sprache/Sprechen über (Sprache in/über) Politik: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen diskursanalytischer Vorgehensweisen.” Aptum2: 135–153.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Schulze, Rainer
2015.
The Significance of ‘the Social’ in Contemporary Linguistics. In
The Exercise of Power in Communication,
► pp. 17 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.