Powerless language
Hedges as cues for interpersonal functions
This paper brings together two different approaches to the analysis of hedges. They are viewed in linguistics as procedural cues relating to the propositional or phrasal contents and their cognitive counterparts. In social psychology, they are interpreted at an interpersonal level as powerlessness markers attributing lack of control and power to the speaker. A comparison of these approaches resulted in the finding that some usages of hedges can be interpreted as unintended interpersonal implicatures weakening speaker traits and persuasive force. A further function is intentional and strategic as in political speech. A third usage is appropriate fuzziness caused by hedges, whereby the hedged expression exhibits accuracy higher than an explicit statement.
References
Austin, John L
1962 How to Do Things with Words. The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ayaß, Ruth
2008 Kommunikation und Geschlecht. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer
Blankenship, Kevin, and Thomas Holtgraves
2005 “
The Role of Different Markers of Linguistic Powerlessness in Persuasion.”
Journal of Language and Social Psychology24(1): 3–24.
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1994 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambrige: Cambrige University Press.
Caffi, Claudia
2007 Mitigation. Boston: Elsevier.
Caffi, Claudia
2010 “Weakening or Strengthening? A Case of Enantiosemy in Plato’s Gorgias.” In
New Approaches to Hedging, ed. by
Gunther Kaltenböck,
Wiltrud Mihatsch, and
Stefan Schneider, 181–202. Bingley: Emerald.
Chambers, Jack K
2003 Sociolinguistic Theory: Linguistic Variation and its Social Significance. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Channell, Joanna
1994 Vague language. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Durik, Amanda, M., M. Anne Britt, Rebecca Reynolds, and Jennifer Storey
2008 “
The Effects of Hedges in Persuasive Arguments: A Nuanced Analysis of Language.”
Journal of Language and Social Psychology27(1): 217–234.
Eckert, Penelope, and Sally McConnell-Ginet
2003 Language and Gender. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Fetzer, Anita
2010 “Hedges in Context: Form and Function of sort of and kind of.” In
New Approaches to Hedging, ed. by
Gunther Kaltenböck,
Wiltrud Mihatsch, and
Stefan Schneider, 1–13. Bingley: Emerald.
Fiske, Susan
2004 Social Beings: Core Motives in Social Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Fraser, Bruce
2010 “Pragmatic Competence: The Case of Hedging.” In
Approaches to Hedging, ed. by
Gunther Kaltenböck,
Wiltrud Mihatsch, and
Stefan Schneider, 15–34. Bingley: Emerald.
Gibbons, Pamela, Jon Busch, and James Bradac
1991 “Powerful versus Powerless Language: Consequences for Persuasion, Impression Formation, and Cognitive Response.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology10(2): 115–133.
Giles, Howard, Justine Coupland, and Nik Coupland
1991 “Accommodation Theory: Communication, Context, and Consequence.” In
Contexts of Accommodation, ed. by
Howard Giles,
Justine Coupland, and
Nik Coupland, 1–68. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Gräßel, Ulrike
1991 Sprachverhalten und Geschlecht: Eine empirische Studie zu geschlechtsspezifischem Sprachverhalten in Fernsehdiskussionen. Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus.
Halmari, Helena, and Tuija Virtanen
Holmes, Janet
2005 “Power and Discourse at Work: Is Gender Relevant?” In
Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by
Michelle Lazar, 31–60. London: Palgrave.
Holtgraves, Thomas
2002 Language as Social Action: Social Psychology and Language Use.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Holtgraves, Thomas
2006 “Conversation Memory: Intentions, Politeness and the Social Context.” In
Language and Memory: Aspects of Knowledge Representation, ed. by
Hanna
Pishwa, 409–424. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Holtgraves, Thomas, and Benjamin Lasky
1999 “
Linguistic Power and Persuasion.”
Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(2): 196–205.
Hosman, Lawrence
1989 “The Evaluative Consequences of Hedges, Hesitations, and Intensifiers: Powerful and Powerless Speech Styles.” Human Communication Research15(3): 383–406.
Hosman, Lawrence
To appear. “
Powerful and Powerless Speech Styles and their Relationship to Perceived Dominance and Control.”
Hosman, Lawrence, Thomas Huebner, and Susan Siltanen
2002 “The Impact of Power-of-Speech Style, Argument Strength, and Need for Cognition on Impression Formation, Cognitive Responses, and Persuasion.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology21(4): 361–379.
Hosman, Lawrence, and Susan Siltanen
2006 “Powerful and Powerless Language Forms: Their Consequences for Impression Formation, Attribution of Control of Self and Control of Others, Cognitive Responses and Message Memory.
” Journal of Language and Social Psychology25(1): 33–46.
Hosman, Lawrence, and Susan Siltanen
2011 “Hedges, Tag Questions, Message Processing, and Persuasion.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology30(3): 341–34.
Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo
2007 “Negativity Bias in Language: A Cognitive-Affective Model of Emotive Intensifiers.” Cognitive Linguistics18(3): 417–443.
Jucker, Andreas, Sara W. Smith, and Tanja Lüdge
2003 “Interactive Aspects of Vagueness in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1737–1769.
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Wiltrud Mihatsch, and Stefan Schneider
2010 „Introduction.“ In
New Approaches to Hedging, ed. by
Gunther Kaltenböck,
Wiltrud Mihatsch, and
Stefan
Schneider, 1–13. Bingley: Emerald.
Klann-Delius, Gisela
2005 Sprache und Geschlecht. Stuttgart: Metzler.
Lakoff, George
1972 “
Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts.”
Linguistic Society Papers, 183–228. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Lakoff, Robin
1973 “Language and Woman’s Place.” Language in Society2: 45–80.
Locher, Miriam
2004 Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreement in Oral Communication. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Markkanen, Raija, and Hartmut Schröder
1997 “Hedges: A Challenge for Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis.” In
Hedging and Discourse: Approaches to the Analysis of a Pragmatic Phenomenon in Academic Texts, ed. by
Raija Markkanen, and
Hartmut Schröder, 4–18. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Mulholland, Joan
1994 Handbook of Persuasive Tactics: A Practical Language Guide. London and New York: Routledge.
Ng, Sik Hung, and James Bradac
1993.
Power in Language: Verbal Communication and Social Influence. Newbury Park, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Ng, Sik Hung, and S.A. Reid
2001 “Power.” In
The New Handbook of Language and Social Psychology, ed. by
Peter Robinson, and
Howard Giles, 357–370. New York: Wiley& Sons.
Petty, Richard E., and John T. Cacioppo
1986 Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Pishwa, Hanna
2003 “Accurate Fuzziness as Constructive Reduction in Communication.” In
Text, Context, Concepts, ed. by
Cornelia Zelinsky-Wibbelt, 299–332. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Planalp, Sally
1999 Communicating Emotion: Social, Moral, and Cultural Processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Raven, Bertram, Joseph Schwarzwald, and Meni Koslowsky
1998 “
Conceptualizing and Measuring a Power/Interaction Model of Interpersonal Influence.”
Journal of Applied Social Psychology 28(4): 307–332.
Rowland, Tim
2007 “‘Well Maybe not Exactly, but It’s around Fifty Basically’: Vague Language in Mathematics Classrooms.” In
Vague Language Explored, ed. by
Joan Cutting, 79–96. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Schneider, Stefan
2010 “Mitigation.” In
Interpersonal Pragmatics, ed. by
Miriam A. Locher, and
Sage L. Graham, 253–269. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Schulz von Thun, Friedemann
200643.
Miteinander reden: Störungen und Klärungen.
Hamburg: Rowohlt.
Schwarz-Friesel, Monika
2010 “Expressive Bedeutung und E-Implikaturen – Zur Relevanz konzeptueller Bewertungen bei indirekten Sprechakten: Das Streichbarkeitskriterium und seine kognitive Realität.” In
Kultura kak Tekst (Kultur als Text), ed. by
William Rudnitzky, (ed.), 12–17. SGT.
Shepard, Carolyn A, Howard Giles, and Beth A. Le Poire
2001 “Communication Accommodation Theory.” In
The New Handbook of Language and Social Psychology, ed. by
W. Peter Robinson, and
Howard Giles, 33–55. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Siakaluk, Paul D., Lori Buchanan, and Chris Westbury
2003 “
The Effect of Semantic Distance in Yes/No and Go/No-go Semantic Categorization Tasks.”
Memory & Cognition 31: 100–113.
Simpson, Paul, and Andrea Mayr
2010 Language and Power: A Resource Book for Students. London and New York: Routledge.
Talbot, Mary
2010 Language and Gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Thimm, Caja, and Lenelis Kruse
1991 “
Dominanz, Macht und Status als Elemente sprachlicher Interaktion: ein Literaturbericht.” MSUniversität Heidelberg/Mannheim.
Thornborrow, Joanna
2001 Power Talk: Language and Interaction in Institutional Discourse: Representation and Interaction in Discourse. London: Longman.
Turner, John
2005 “Explaining the Nature of Power: A Three-Process Theory.” European Journal of Social Psychology35: 1–22.
Virtanen, Tuija, and Helena Halmari
Wilson, Steven R
2002 Seeking and Resisting Compliance: Why People Say What They Do When Trying to Influence Others. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Pishwa, Hanna
2015.
Information Source as Persuasive Power in Political Interviews: the Case of Obama. In
The Exercise of Power in Communication,
► pp. 130 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.