Article published in:
Contexts of Subordination: Cognitive, typological and discourse perspectives
Edited by Laura Visapää, Jyrki Kalliokoski and Helena Sorva
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 249] 2014
► pp. 116
References
Auer, Peter
2000“Pre- and post-positioning of wenn-clauses in spoken and written German.” In Cause – Condition – Concession – Contrast. Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives [Topics in English Linguistics 33], ed. by E. Couper-Kuhlen, and B. Kortmann, 173–204. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins, and William Pagliuca
1994The Evolution of Grammar. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1984“How people use adverbial clauses.” BLS 10: 437–449.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
2008“Subordination, Coordination: Form, Semantics, Pragmatics.” In Subordination and Coordination in North Asian Languages, ed. by Edward J. Vaida, 1–16. 
Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Sandra A. Thompson
2000“Concessive Patterns in Conversation.” In Cause – Condition – Concession – Contrast. Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives [Topics in English Linguistics 33], ed. by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Berndt 
Kortmann, 381–410. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia
2003Subordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2008“Asymmetric Events, Subordination, and Grammatical Categories.” In Asymmetric Events, ed. by Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, 151–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
1990Typology and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1995“Autonomy and Functionalist Linguistics.” Language 71: 490–532. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W., and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
(eds) 2009The Semantics of Clause-Linking. A Cross-Linguistic Typology. Explorations in Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles
1985Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press/Bradford.Google Scholar
Fabricius-Hansen, Cathrine, and Wiebke Ramm
(eds) 2008, ‘Subordination’ versus ‘Coordination’ in Sentence and Text: A Cross-linguistic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia
1993Grammar in Interaction. Adverbial Clauses in American English Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1987“Beyond Foreground and Background.” In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse, ed. by Russell S. Tomlin, 175–188. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1990Syntax. A Functional-Typological Introduction, Vol. II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, and Alessandro Duranti
(eds) 1992Rethinking Context. Cambridge: 
Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haiman, John, and Sandra A. Thompson
1984““Subordination” in Universal Grammar.” BLS 10: 510–523.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, Auli, Maria Vilkuna, Riitta Korhonen, Vesa Koivisto, Tarja Riitta Heinonen, and Irja Alho
(eds) 2004Iso suomen kielioppi ( The Comprehensive Grammar of Finnish ). 
Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K., and Ruqaiya Hasan
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2004“Coordinating Constructions: an Overview.” In Coordinating Constructions, ed. by Martin Haspelmath, 3–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil, and Bernard Comrie
(eds) 2005The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa
1993“Are Relative Clauses Either Restrictive or Non-restrictive? A Study of Relative Clauses in the Finnish Pear Stories.” In Case and Other Functional Categories in Finnish syntax, ed. by Anders Holmberg, and Urpo Nikanne, 163–176. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa, and Ritva Laury
2008 “Finnish Relative Clauses in Conversation: Main Clauses as Emergent Formulas.” Handout. UCSB Linguistics Department Colloquium , May 5, 2008.
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa
2009 “Relative Clause Structures in Context.” Handout. International Pragmatics Conference , Melbourne, July 2009, Panel on Clause combining in Discourse.
Herlin, Ilona
1997Suomen kielen koska-konjunktion merkitys ja merkityksenkehitys [Suomi 183]. Helsinki: SKS.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul
1987“Emergent Grammar”. BLS 13: 139–157.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul, and Elizabeth Traugott
2003Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul, and Sandra A. Thompson
2008“Projectability and Clause Combining in Interaction.” In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifunctionality of Conjunctions, ed. by Ritva Laury, 99–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoey, Michael
2001Textual Interaction. An Introduction to Written Discourse Analysis. 
London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kalliokoski, Jyrki
1989Ja. Rinnastus ja rinnastuskonjunktion käyttö. [ Ja. Coordination and the Use the Coordinating Conjunction in Finnish ]. Helsinki: SKS.Google Scholar
2010“A Discourse Perspective to Subordination.” In Langues finno-ougriennes: Aspects grammaticaux et typologiques [Cahiers d’etudes hongroises 15], ed. by 
Patrick Renaud, 91–101. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo
2008“Clause Combining and Sequenced Actions: The Estonian Complementizer and Pragmatic Particle et.” In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifunctionality of Conjunctions, ed. by R. Laury, 125–152. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koivisto, Aino, Ritva Laury, and Eeva-Leena Seppänen
2011. “Syntactic and Actional Characteristics of Finnish että-Clauses.” In Subordination in Conversation. A Cross-linguistic Perspective, ed. by Ritva Laury, and Ryoko Suzuki, 69–102. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
1993Nominalizations [Theoretical linguistics series]. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Berndt
1997Adverbial Subordinators. Typology and History of Adverbial Subordinators Based on European Languages. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol 2: Descriptive Application. California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2008“Subordination in Cognitive Grammar.” In Asymmetric Events, ed. by Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, 137–149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laury, Ritva
(ed.) 2008Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifunctionality of Conjunctions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laury, Ritva, and Ryoko Suzuki
(eds) 2011Subordination in Conversation. A cross-linguistic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laury, Ritva, and Eeva-Leena Seppänen
2008“Clause Combining, Interaction, Evidentiality, Participation Structure, and the Conjunction-Particle Continuum: The Finnish että.” In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining, ed. by Ritva Laury, 153–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1988“Towards a Typology of Clause Linkage.” In Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse, ed. by John Haiman, and Sandra A. Thompson, 181–225. 
Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Longacre, Robert
2007“Sentences as Combination of Predications.” In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. II: Complex Constructions, ed. by Timothy Shopen, 372–420. New edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mann, William, and Sandra A. Thompson
1988“Rhetorical Structure Theory. Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organization.” Text 8: 243–281.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian, and Sandra A. Thompson
1988“The Structure of Discourse and ‘Subordination’.” In Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse [Volume 18 of Typological Studies in Language], ed. by John Haiman, and Sandra A. Thompson, 275–329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pawley, Andrew, and Frances H. Syder
2000“The One-clause-at-a-time Hypothesis.” In Perspectives on Fluency, ed. by H. Riggenbach, 164–199. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michi­gan Press.Google Scholar
Ramsay, Violeta
1987“The Functional Distribution of Preposed and Postposed “If” and “When” Clauses in Written Discourse.” In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse, ed. by Russell S. Tomlin, 383–408. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rudolph, Elizabeth
1996Contrast. Adversative and Concessive Expressions on Sentence and Text Level. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sanders, Ted, Wilbert Spooren, and Leo Noordman
1992 “Toward a Taxonomy of Coherence Relations.” Discourse Processes 15(1): 1–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A
2007Sequence Organization in Interaction. A Primer in Conversation analysis, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shopen, Timothy
(ed.) 2007Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. II: Complex Constructions. New edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
1990From Etymology to Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taboada, Maite and William C. Mann
2006 “Rhetorical Structure Theory: Looking Back and Moving Ahead”. Discourse Studies 8(3): 423–459. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A
1985Grammar and Written Discourse: Initial vs. Final Purpose Clauses in English.” Text 5: 55–84.Google Scholar
2002 “Object Complements” and Conversation: Towards a Realistic Account.” Studies in Language 60 (1): 125–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomlin, Russell S
1985 “Foreground-Background Information and the Syntax of Subordination”. Text 5: 85–122.Google Scholar
Verhagen, Arie
2005Constructions of Intersubjectivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar