Article published in:
Contexts of Subordination: Cognitive, typological and discourse perspectivesEdited by Laura Visapää, Jyrki Kalliokoski and Helena Sorva
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 249] 2014
► pp. 147–172
On the contextual conceptualization of joka relative clauses in Finnish
Studies on relative clauses commonly distinguish between two types of relative clauses: restrictive and non-restrictive. Research suggests that the restrictive relative clauses are subordinate and thus tightly connected to their main clause. Non-restrictive relative clauses, on the other hand, could often be replaced by a co-ordinating conjunction or by two independent clauses. Consequently, their status as subordinate constructions is called into question: they are categorized as non-subordinate relative constructions – or at least as being less subordinate than restrictive relative clauses. This article discusses the usefulness of the notions restrictive and non-restrictive relative clause in the description of Finnish data. Finnish joka clauses seem to be instantiating only one construction type, and its function as either restrictive or non-restrictive depends on contextual factors. However, analyzing relative clauses as merely just one construction type has theoretical implications for the research on subordination. If the same grammatical construction can have subordinate and non-subordinate functions only depending on the context it is used in, the question of what subordination is primarily becomes a matter of dynamic conceptualization. This article suggests that the Finnish joka construction is neither subordinate nor non-subordinate, but that it has construal potentials that are evoked in complex ways in the real contexts of use.
Published online: 04 September 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.249.06vis
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.249.06vis
References
Becker, Rita
Comrie, Bernard
Comrie, Bernard, and Tanya Kuteva
2008 “Supplement: Relativization Strategies.” In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, ed. by Matthew S. Dryer, and Martin Haspelmath. Munich: Max Plank Digital Library. Introduction to Ch. 122 and 123. Available online at: http://wals.info/supplement/8
Cornilescu, Alexandra
Daalder, Saskia
Downing, Bruce T
Etelämäki, Marja
2009 “Activities Within Activities: Left Dislocations with Relative Clauses.”
Presentation. Aspects of Clause Combining: the Linking of Actions in Speech and Writing
. Helsingin yliopisto, October 29–31, 2009.
Etelämäki, Marja, Ilona Herlin, Minna Jaakola, and Laura Visapää
Etelämäki, Marja, and Laura Visapää
Fox, Barbara A
Fox, Barbara A., and Sandra A. Thompson
Hakulinen, Auli, Fred Karlsson, and Maria Vilkuna
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa, and Ritva Laury
2008 “Finnish Relative Clauses in Conversation: Main Clauses as Emergent Formulas.” Handout.
UCSB Linguistics Department Colloquium
, May 5, 2008.
2009 “Relative Clause Structures in Context.” Handout.
International Pragmatics Conference
. Melbourne, July 2009, Panel on Clause combining in Discourse.
Huddleston, Rodney, and Geoffrey K. Pullum
ISK = Hakulinen, Auli, Maria Vilkuna, Riitta Korhonen, Vesa Koivisto, Tarja Riitta Heinonen,
and Irja Alho
2004 Iso suomen kielioppi [
The Comprehensive Grammar of Finnish
].
Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura. Available at: http://scripta.kotus.fi/visk.
Jespersen, Otto
Keenan, Edward L
Kuntsman, Pierre
Lambrecht, Knud
Langacker, Ronald W
Loock, Rudy
Manninen, Satu
Niskanen, Tuulikki
Tao, Hongyin, and Michael McCarthy
Visakko, Tomi