Article published in:
Contexts of Subordination: Cognitive, typological and discourse perspectives
Edited by Laura Visapää, Jyrki Kalliokoski and Helena Sorva
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 249] 2014
► pp. 147172
References

References

Becker, Rita
1978Oberflächenstrukturelle Unterschiede zwischen restriktiven und nicht-restriktiven Relativsätzen in Deutschen. Trier: L.A.U.T.
Comrie, Bernard
1981Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Syntax and Morphology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Comrie, Bernard, and Tanya Kuteva
2008“Supplement: Relativization Strategies.” In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, ed. by Matthew S. Dryer, and Martin Haspelmath. Munich: Max Plank Digital Library. Introduction to Ch. 122 and 123. Available online at: http://​wals​.info​/supplement​/8
Cornilescu, Alexandra
1981“Non-restrictive Relative Clauses, An Essay in Semantic Description.” Revue roumaine de linguistique 26(1): 41–67.
Cristofaro, Sonia
2003Subordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2008“Asymmetric Events, Subordination, and Grammatical Categories.” In Asymmetric Events, ed. by Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, 151–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Daalder, Saskia
1989“Continuative Relative Clauses.” In Sprechen und Hören [Akten des 23]. ed. by Norbert Reiter, 195–207. Berlin: Linguistischen Kolloquiums.
Downing, Bruce T.
1978“Some Universals of Relative Clause Structure.” In Universals of Human Language. Vol. 4, Syntax, ed. by Joseph H. Greenberg, 374–418. Cambridge: 
Cambridge University Press.
Emonds, Joseph
1979“Appositive Relatives have No Properties.” Linguistic Inquiry 10(2): 241–243.
Etelämäki, Marja
2009“Activities Within Activities: Left Dislocations with Relative Clauses.” Presentation. Aspects of Clause Combining: the Linking of Actions in Speech and Writing . Helsingin yliopisto, October 29–31, 2009.
Etelämäki, Marja, Ilona Herlin, Minna Jaakola, and Laura Visapää
2009 “Kielioppi käsitteistyksenä ja toimintana. Kognitiivista kielioppia ja keskustelunanalyysia yhdistämässä.” [Grammar as conceptualization and as action: Combining cognitive grammar and conversation analysis]. Virittäjä 2: 162–187.
Etelämäki, Marja, and Laura Visapää
2014 “Why Blend Conversation Analysis with Cognitive Grammar.” Pragmatics 24(3): 477–506.
Fox, Barbara A.
1987“The Noun Phrase Accessibility Hierarchy Reinterpreted: Subject Primacy or the Absolutive Hypothesis?” Language 63(4): 856–870. Crossref link
Fox, Barbara A., and Sandra A. Thompson
1990“A Discourse Explanation of the Grammar of Relative Clauses in English Conversation.” Language 66(2): 297–316. Crossref link
2007“Relative Clauses in English Conversation. Relativizers, Frequency, and the Notion of Construction.” Studies in Language 31(2): 293–326. Crossref link
Hakulinen, Auli, Fred Karlsson, and Maria Vilkuna
1980Suomen tekstilauseiden piirteitä: kvantitatiivinen tutkimus [ The properties of the Finnish text clauses: a quantitative study ]. Publications No 6. Department of General Linguistics, University of Helsinki.
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa
1993“Are Relative Clauses Either Restrictive or Non-restrictive? A Study of Relative Clauses in the Finnish Pear Stories.” In Case and Other Functional Categories in Finnish syntax, ed. by Anders Holmberg, and Urpo Nikanne, 163–176. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa, and Ritva Laury
2008 “Finnish Relative Clauses in Conversation: Main Clauses as Emergent Formulas.” Handout. UCSB Linguistics Department Colloquium , May 5, 2008.
2009 “Relative Clause Structures in Context.” Handout. International Pragmatics Conference . Melbourne, July 2009, Panel on Clause combining in Discourse.
Huddleston, Rodney, and Geoffrey K. Pullum
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ISK = Hakulinen, Auli, Maria Vilkuna, Riitta Korhonen, Vesa Koivisto, Tarja Riitta Heinonen, 
and Irja Alho
2004Iso suomen kielioppi [ The Comprehensive Grammar of Finnish ]. 
Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura. Available at: http://​scripta​.kotus​.fi​/visk.
Jespersen, Otto
1970 [1927]A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles Vol. 3 
London: George Allen & Unwin.
Karvonen, Pirjo
1995Oppikirjateksti toimintana. Helsinki: SKS.
Keenan, Edward L.
1985“Relative Clauses.” In Language typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. II, ed. by Timothy Shopen, 141–170. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kuntsman, Pierre
1994“Relatif et liaison: le cas du relatif dit de ‘liaison’.” In Le Moyen Francais, ed. by Bernard Combettes, Simone MonsonegoPhilologie et linguistique. , and Approches du texte et du discours: Actes du VIII8 colloque international sur le moyen francais, 517–527. Paris: Didier Erudition.
Lambrecht, Knud
1994Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, focus, and the Mental Representation of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Langacker, Ronald W.
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 2: Descriptive Application. California: Stanford University Press.
1999Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
2008“Subordination in Cognitive Grammar.” In Asymmetric Events, ed. by Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, 137–149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Lehmann, Christian
1984Der Relativsatz. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
Loock, Rudy
2007“Appositive Relative Clauses and their Functions in Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 39: 336–362. Crossref link
Lucas, Michael A.
1974“The Surface Structure of Relative Clauses.” Linguistics 139: 83–120.
Manninen, Satu
2003“To Raise or Not to Raise: The Case of Finnish Restrictive Relative Clauses.” Nordlyd 31(4): 668–693.
Niskanen, Tuulikki
1974Lausetyypit lehti- ja radiokielessä sekä vapaassa puhekielessä [ Clause types in newspaper and radio language and in free spoken language ]. MA thesis. Oulun yliopiston suomen ja saamen kielen laitos.
Penttilä, Aarni
1954“Hiukan relatiivilauseista.” [On relative clauses]. Virittäjä 58: 419–422.
Pääkkönen, Irmeli
1988Relatiivisanan valinta [ The choice of the relative word ]. Helsinki: SKS.
Tao, Hongyin, and Michael McCarthy
2001“Understanding Non-restrictive which-clauses, Which is Not an Easy Thing.” Language Sciences 23: 451–677. Crossref link
Visakko, Tomi
2007Elokuva-arvostelut ja arvottamisen retoriikka[ Film Reviews and the Rhetorics of Evaluating ]. MA thesis. Helsingin yliopiston suomen kielen ja kotimaisen kirjallisuuden laitos.
Visapää, Laura
2012Joka-relatiivilauseiden funktioista.” [On the Functions if joka Relative Clauses]. Virittäjä 4: 533–559.