English Speech Rhythm
Form and function in everyday verbal interaction
Author
This monograph reconsiders the question of speech isochrony, the regular recurrence of (stressed) syllables in time, from an empirical point of view. It proposes a methodology for discovering isochrony auditorily in speech and for verifying it instrumentally in the acoustic laboratory. In a small-scale study of an English conversational extract, the gestalt-like rhythmic structures which isochrony creates are shown to have a hierarchical organization. Then in a large-scale study of a corpus of British and American radio phone-in programs and family table conversations, the function of speech rhythm at turn transitions is investigated. It is argued that speech rhythm serves as a metric for the timing of turn transitions in casual English conversation. The articular rhythmic configuration of a transition can be said to contextualize the next turn as, generally speaking, affiliative or disaffiliative with the prior turn. The empirical investigation suggests that speech rhythm patterns at turn transitions in everyday English conversation are not random occurrences or the result of a social-psychological adaptation process but are contextualization cues which figure systematically in the creation and interpretation of linguistic meaning in communication.
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 25] 1993. x, 346 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Contents | p. v
-
Table of Figures | p. ix
-
Introduction | p. 1
-
Is there rythm in speech? | p. 5
-
Discovering rythm in English speech | p. 37
-
The hierachical organization of speech rythm | p. 79
-
Analyzing speech rythm at turn transitions | p. 115
-
Accounting for speech rythm at turn transitions | p. 163
-
Interpreting speech rythm at sequence-external junctures | p. 197
-
Interpreting speech rythm at seuqnce-internal junctures | p. 221
-
Interpreting speech rytm in specific activity sequences | p. 269
-
Conclusion | p. 297
-
Appendix I: Instrumental measurements of perceptually isochronous sequences | p. 299
-
Appendix II: Instrumental measurements of perceptually non-isochronous sequences | p. 305
-
-
Index of Authors and subjects | p. 335
Cited by
Cited by 82 other publications
Adeniran, Adetunji & Judith Masthoff
2021. Quantitative Analysis to Further Validate WC-GCMS, a Computational Metric of Collaboration in Online Textual Discourse. In Artificial Intelligence in Education [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12749], ► pp. 29 ff. 
Ali, Hadeel Kamil & Rand Khalid Abdulrahman
2021. دور السمات العروضية في اظهار التفاوض التفاعلي بين الافراد في مقابلات سياسية امريكية مختارة. Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities 28:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Andrews, Richard
2021. Polyrhythmicity in Conversation and Speech Prosodies. In Polyrhythmicity in Language, Music and Society [Cultural Studies and Transdisciplinarity in Education, 12], ► pp. 55 ff.
Barkhuysen, Pashiera, Emiel Krahmer & Marc Swerts
2008. The interplay between the auditory and visual modality for end-of-utterance detection. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123:1 ► pp. 354 ff.
Barnhill, Eric
2014. Entrainment is sparse. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8
Benadon, Fernando
2014. Metrical perception of trisyllabic speech rhythms. Psychological Research 78:1 ► pp. 113 ff.
Betz, Emma & Andrea Golato
2008. Remembering Relevant Information and Withholding Relevant Next Actions: The German Tokenachja. Research on Language & Social Interaction 41:1 ► pp. 58 ff.
Beňuš, Štefan
2011. Adaptation in Turn-Initiations. In Toward Autonomous, Adaptive, and Context-Aware Multimodal Interfaces. Theoretical and Practical Issues [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6456], ► pp. 72 ff.
Bolden, Galina
2004. The quote and beyond: defining boundaries of reported speech in conversational Russian. Journal of Pragmatics 36:6 ► pp. 1071 ff.
Braem, Penny Boyes
1999. Rhythmic Temporal Patterns in the Signing of Deaf Early and Late Learners of Swiss German Sign Language. Language and Speech 42:2-3 ► pp. 177 ff.
Brown, Meredith, Anne Pier Salverda, Laura C. Dilley & Michael K. Tanenhaus
2011. Expectations from preceding prosody influence segmentation in online sentence processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 18:6 ► pp. 1189 ff.
Bögels, Sara & Stephen C. Levinson
2017. The Brain Behind the Response: Insights Into Turn-taking in Conversation From Neuroimaging. Research on Language and Social Interaction 50:1 ► pp. 71 ff.
Cantarutti, Marina N. & Beatrice Szczepek Reed
2021. Stress and Rhythm. In The Cambridge Handbook of Phonetics, ► pp. 159 ff.
Carroll, Susanne E.
1999. Putting ‘input’ in its proper place. Second Language Research 15:4 ► pp. 337 ff.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2007. Situated phonologies: patterns of phonology in discourse contexts. In Phonology in Context, ► pp. 186 ff.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2015. Intonation and Discourse. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ► pp. 82 ff.
Couper‐Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2005. Intonation and Discourse: Current Views from Within. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ► pp. 11 ff.
Cummins, Fred
2015. Rhythm and Speech. In The Handbook of Speech Production, ► pp. 158 ff.
Di Cristo, Albert
1999. Vers une modélisation de l'accentuation du français: première partie. Journal of French Language Studies 9:2 ► pp. 143 ff.
Dressler, Richard A., Eugene H. Buder & Michael P. Cannito
2009. Rhythmic patterns during conversational repairs in speakers with aphasia. Aphasiology 23:6 ► pp. 731 ff.
Edwards, Jane A.
2005. The Transcription of Discourse. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ► pp. 321 ff.
Feizabadi, Parvin Sadat & Mahmood Bijankhan
2015. The Effect of Non-sentential Context Prosody on Homographs’ Lexical Activation in Persian. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 44:6 ► pp. 831 ff.
Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox & Sandra A. Thompson
2022. Practices in the construction of turns. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 427 ff.
Ford, Cecilia E. & Trini Stickle
2012. Securing recipiency in workplace meetings: Multimodal practices. Discourse Studies 14:1 ► pp. 11 ff.
Fuchs, Robert
2016. The Concept and Measurement of Speech Rhythm. In Speech Rhythm in Varieties of English [Prosody, Phonology and Phonetics, ], ► pp. 35 ff.
Golato, Andrea & Zsuzsanna Fagyal
2008. Comparing Single and Double Sayings of the German Response Tokenjaand the Role of Prosody: A Conversation Analytic Perspective. Research on Language & Social Interaction 41:3 ► pp. 241 ff.
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003. Grammaticalization,
Inden, Benjamin, Zofia Malisz, Petra Wagner & Ipke Wachsmuth
2013. Proceedings of the 15th ACM on International conference on multimodal interaction, ► pp. 181 ff.
Kang, Okim, Alyssa Kermad & Naoko Taguchi
2021. The interplay of proficiency and study abroad experience on the prosody of L2 speech acts. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation 7:3 ► pp. 343 ff.
Kern, Friederike & Sören Ohlhus
2017. Fluency and the integration of semiotic resources in interactional learning processes. Classroom Discourse 8:2 ► pp. 139 ff.
Kern, Friederike & Margret Selting
2012. Conversation Analysis and Interactional Linguistics. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Kern, Friederike & Margret Selting
2020. Conversation Analysis and Interactional Linguistics. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff.
Kim, Kyu-hyun
2022. Sequential organization of post-predicate elements in Korean conversation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 573 ff.
Klewitz, Gabriele & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2022. Quote – unquote? the role of prosody in the contextualization of reported speech sequences. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 459 ff.
Korpela, Rosa, Melisa Stevanovic & Salla Kurhila
2023. ,
Ling, Low Ee, Esther Grabe & Francis Nolan
2000. Q uantitative Characterizations of Speech Rhythm: Syllable-Timing in Singapore English. Language and Speech 43:4 ► pp. 377 ff.
Local, John & Gareth Walker
2004. Abrupt-joins as a resource for the production of multi-unit, multi-action turns. Journal of Pragmatics 36:8 ► pp. 1375 ff.
Low, Ee Ling
2006. A Review of Recent Research on Speech Rhythm: Some Insights for Language Acquisition, Language disorders and Language Teaching. In Spoken English, Tesol and Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 99 ff.
Low, Ee‐Ling
2015. The Rhythmic Patterning of English(es). In The Handbook of English Pronunciation, ► pp. 125 ff.
Marmorstein, Michal & Nadav Matalon
Martinec, Radan
2020. Linguistic Rhythm and its Meaning. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 14:1-2 ► pp. 70 ff.
McArthur, Tom
2001. World English and world Englishes: Trends, tensions, varieties, and standards. Language Teaching 34:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Ogden, Richard
2013. Clicks and percussives in English conversation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 43:3 ► pp. 299 ff.
Ogden, Richard
2020. Audibly Not Saying Something with Clicks. Research on Language and Social Interaction 53:1 ► pp. 66 ff.
Ogden, Richard
2021. The Phonetics of Talk in Interaction. In The Cambridge Handbook of Phonetics, ► pp. 657 ff.
Ordin, Mikhail
2019. Speech rhythm as naturally occurring and culturally transmitted behavioral patterns. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1453:1 ► pp. 5 ff.
Polyanskaya, Leona, Arthur G. Samuel & Mikhail Ordin
2019. Speech Rhythm Convergence as a Social Coalition Signal. Evolutionary Psychology 17:3 ► pp. 147470491987933 ff.
Reed, Beatrice Szczepek
2012. Suprasegmentals: Prosody in Conversation. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Reed, Beatrice Szczepek
2012. Prosody in Conversation: Implications for Teaching English Pronunciation. In Pragmatics and Prosody in English Language Teaching [Educational Linguistics, 15], ► pp. 147 ff.
Reed, Beatrice Szczepek
2012. Rhythm and Timing in Interaction. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Szczepek Reed, Beatrice
2010. Prosody and alignment: a sequential perspective. Cultural Studies of Science Education 5:4 ► pp. 859 ff.
Szczepek Reed, Beatrice
2012. A conversation analytic perspective on teaching English pronunciation: The case of speech rhythm. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 22:1 ► pp. 67 ff.
SZCZEPEK REED, BEATRICE
2012. Conversation Analysis and Prosody. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Szczepek Reed, Beatrice
2012. Beyond the Particular: Prosody and the Coordination of Actions. Language and Speech 55:1 ► pp. 13 ff.
Riou, Marine
2017. The Prosody of Topic Transition in Interaction: Pitch Register Variations. Language and Speech 60:4 ► pp. 658 ff.
Ritt, Nikolaus
2004. Selfish Sounds and Linguistic Evolution,
Roberts, Seán G., Francisco Torreira & Stephen C. Levinson
2015. The effects of processing and sequence organization on the timing of turn taking: a corpus study. Frontiers in Psychology 6
Robledo, Juan Pablo, Sarah Hawkins, Carlos Cornejo, Ian Cross, Daniel Party, Esteban Hurtado & Psyche Loui
2021. Musical improvisation enhances interpersonal coordination in subsequent conversation: Motor and speech evidence. PLOS ONE 16:4 ► pp. e0250166 ff.
Rosenberger Shankar, T., M. VanKleek, A. Vicente & B.K. Smith
2000. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, ► pp. 10 ff.
Rumsey, Lacy
2020. Free Verse and Open Form. In A Companion to Contemporary British and Irish Poetry, 1960–2015, ► pp. 143 ff.
Selting, Margret
Selting, Margret
2022. On the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn-constructional units and turns in conversation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 371 ff.
Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie
2000. Phrase-Level Phonology in Speech Production Planning: Evidence for the Role of Prosodic Structure. In Prosody: Theory and Experiment [Text, Speech and Language Technology, 14], ► pp. 201 ff.
Sherstinova, Tatiana
2017. Preparing Audio Recordings of Everyday Speech for Prosody Research: The Case of the ORD Corpus. In Speech and Computer [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10458], ► pp. 623 ff.
Shockley, Kevin, Marie-Vee Santana & Carol A. Fowler
2003. Mutual interpersonal postural constraints are involved in cooperative conversation.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29:2 ► pp. 326 ff.
Sokoreva, Tatiana & Tatiana Shevchenko
2022. The Role of Pause in Interaction: A Case of Polylogue. In Speech and Computer [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13721], ► pp. 641 ff.
Spinos, Anna-Marie R., Daniel C. O’Connell & Sabine Kowal
2022. An empirical investigation of pause notation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 1 ff.
Staack, Michael
2022. Rhythmus. In Handbuch Körpersoziologie 1, ► pp. 135 ff.
Stivers, Tanya, N. J. Enfield, Penelope Brown, Christina Englert, Makoto Hayashi, Trine Heinemann, Gertie Hoymann, Federico Rossano, Jan Peter de Ruiter, Kyung-Eun Yoon & Stephen C. Levinson
2009. Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106:26 ► pp. 10587 ff.
Van Leeuwen, Theo
2012. Multimodality and Rhythm. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Vranjes, Jelena & Bert Oben
2022. Anticipation and timing of turn-taking in dialogue interpreting. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 34:4 ► pp. 627 ff.
Wells, Bill & Sarah Macfarlane
1998. Prosody as an Interactional Resource: Turn-projection and Overlap. Language and Speech 41:3-4 ► pp. 265 ff.
Wichmann, Anne
2010. Intonational meaning in institutional settings: the role of syntagmatic relations. Cultural Studies of Science Education 5:4 ► pp. 849 ff.
Wright, Melissa
2011. On clicks in English talk-in-interaction. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 41:2 ► pp. 207 ff.
Wynn, Camille J., Tyson S. Barrett & Stephanie A. Borrie
2022. Rhythm Perception, Speaking Rate Entrainment, and Conversational Quality: A Mediated Model. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 65:6 ► pp. 2187 ff.
[no author supplied]
2012. References. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ► pp. 741 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2019. References. In Systematically Working with Multimodal Data, ► pp. 277 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CF: Linguistics
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General