Article published in:
Discourses of Helping Professions
Edited by Eva-Maria Graf, Marlene Sator and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 252] 2014
► pp. 205226
References

References

Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar
2011“Double Sayings of German JA – More Observations on their Phonetic Form and Alignment Function.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 44 (2): 157–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bilmes, Jack
1988“The Concept of Preference in Conversation Analysis.” Language in Society 17 (2): 161–181. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Elizabeth, and John Heritage
2006“Taking the Patient’s Medical History: Questioning during Comprehensive History Taking.” In Communication in Medical Care: Interactions between Primary Care Physicians and Patients, ed. by John Heritage, and Douglas W.
 Maynard, 151–184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf
2008 “Verstehen im Gespräch [Understanding in Conversation].” In Sprache – Kognition – Kultur. Sprache zwischen mentaler Struktur und kultureller Prägung, ed. by Heidrun Kämper, and Ludwig M. Eichinger, 225–261. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf, and Reinhold Schmitt
2009 “Verstehensdokumentationen: Zur Phänomenologie von Verstehen in der Interaktion [Understanding displays: On the Phenomenology of Understanding in Interaction].” Deutsche Sprache 36 (3): 220–245.Google Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf, and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy
2011“Doctors’ Questions as Displays of Understanding.” Communication & Medicine 8 (2): 111–124.Google Scholar
Gill, Virginia T., Anita Pomerantz, and Paul Denvir
2009“Pre-Emptive Resistance: Patients’ Participation in Diagnostic Sense-Making Activities.” Sociology of Health & Illness 32 (1): 1–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie H., and Charles Goodwin
1986“Gesture and Coparticipation in the Activity of Searching for a Word.” Semiotica 62 (1–2): 51–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
1975“Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and semantics 3, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John
2007“Intersubjectivity and Progressivity in References to Persons (and Places).” In Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives, ed. by Tanya Stivers, and Nick J. Enfield, 255–280. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Steven Clayman
2010Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and Douglas Maynard
(eds) 2006Communication in Medical Care: Interaction between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, Jeffrey Robinson, Marc Elliott, Megan Beckett, and Michael Wilkes
2007“Reducing Patients’ Unmet Concerns in Primary Care: The Difference One Word Can Make.” Journal of General Internal Medicine 22 (10): 1429–1433. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1981“The abominable ’ne?’ An Exploration of Post-Response Pursuit of Response.” In Dialogforschung, ed. by Peter Schröder, 53–88. Düsseldorf: Schwann.Google Scholar
Manning, Philip, and George Ray
2002“Setting the Agenda: An Analysis of Negotiation Strategies in Clinical Talk.” Health Communication 14 (4): 451–473. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1984“Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by Maxwell J. Atkinson, and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1986“Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimizing Claims.” Human Studies 9 (2–3): 219–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey
2003“Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding.” American Sociological Review 68 (6): 939–967. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sator, Marlene
2003Zum Umgang mit Relevanzmarkierungen im ÄrztInnen-PatientInnen-Gespräch. Eine konversationsanalytische Fallstudie eines Erstgesprächs auf der onkologischen Ambulanz [Dealing with markers of relevance in doctor-patient communication. A conversation analytic cases study of a first medical consultation in an oncological ambulance]. Diplom-Arbeit. Universität Wien.Google Scholar
2011Schmerzdifferenzierung – Eine gesprächsanalytische Untersuchung ärztlicher Erstgespräche an der Kopfschmerzambulanz [Pain differentiation. A conversation analytic analysis of first medical consultations in the ambulance for headache]. Wien: v&r, Vienna University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel
1979“The Relevance of Repair for Syntax-for-Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax, ed. by Talmy Givón, 261–286. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1992“Repair after Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation.” American Journal of Sociology 97 (5): 1295–1345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997“Third Turn Repair.” In Towards a Social Science of Language 2, ed. by Gregory R. Guy, Crawford Feagin, Deborah Schiffrin, and John Baugh, 31–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Sequence Organization in Interaction. A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schöffler, Marta, and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy
2012“ja m_hm. Patientenreaktionen auf prädiagnostische Mitteilungen [yes u_hm. Patients’ reactions to anticipatory reactions].” Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik 57 (1): 1–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret, et al.
2011“A System for Transcribing Talk-in-Interaction: GAT 2.” Translated by Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen, and Dagmar Barth-Weingarten. Gesprächsforschung 12: 1–51. Accessed November 22, 2012, http://​www​.gespraechsforschung​-ozs​.de​/heft2011​/px​-gat2​-englisch​.pdf.Google Scholar
Spranz-Fogasy, Thomas
2010“Verstehensdokumentation in der medizinischen Kommunikation: Fragen und Antworten im Arzt-Patient-Gespräch [Understanding displays in medical communication: Questions and answers in doctor-patient communication].” In Verstehen in Professionellen Handlungsfeldern, ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, Ulrich Reitemeier, Reinhold Schmitt, and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy, 27–116. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and John Heritage
2001“Breaking the Sequential Mold: Answering ‘More than the Question’ during Comprehensive History Taking.” Text 21 (1): 151–185.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Jeffrey Robinson
2006“A Preference for Progressivity in Interaction.” Language in Society 35 (3): 367–392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar