Article published in:
The Pragmatics of Discourse Coherence: Theories and applications
Edited by Helmut Gruber and Gisela Redeker
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 254] 2014
► pp. 23–52

Explicit and implicit coherence relations in Dutch texts

This study explores some of the factors that influence the probability that a coherence relation will be explicitly marked with a connective. In a corpus of 80 Dutch texts from expository and persuasive genres with annotations of the coherence structure (using Rhetorical Structure Theory, RST) and the genre-specific structure (using move analysis), we investigate the roles and interactions of genre, level in the hierarchical discourse structure, and type of coherence relation.
Published online: 26 November 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.254.02vli
References
Abelen, Eric, Gisela Redeker, and Sandra A. Thompson
1993 “The Rhetorical Structure of US-American and Dutch Fund-raising Letters.” Text 13: 323–350.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Asher, Nicholas, and Alex Lascarides
2003 Logics of Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K.
2005 “Generic Patterns in Promotional Discourse.” In Persuasion across Genres, ed. by Helena Halmari, and Tuija Virtanen, 213–225. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berzlánovich, Ildikó, and Gisela Redeker
2012 “Genre-dependent Interaction of Coherence and Lexical Cohesion in Written Discourse.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 8 (1): 183–208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas
1988 Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995 Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross-linguistic Comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Ulla Connor, and Thomas A. Upton
2007 Discourse on the Move: Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
den Boon, Ton, and Dirk Geeraerts
2005 Van Dale Groot woordenboek van de Nederlandse taal, 14th ed. Utrecht: Van Dale.Google Scholar
den Ouden, Hanny J. N., Carel H. van Wijk, Jacques M. B. Terken, and Leo G. M. Noordman
1998 “Reliability of Discourse Structure Annotation.” IPO Annual Progress Report 33: 129–138.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra, and Dionysis Goutsos
1997 Discourse Analysis: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Goutsos, Dionysis
1997 Modeling Discourse Topic: Sequential Relations and Strategies in Expository Text. [Advances in Discourse Processes, Vol., LIX]. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Grosz, Barbara, and Candace Sidner
1986 “Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of Discourse.” Computational Linguistics 12 (3): 175–204.Google Scholar
Gruber, Helmut, and Peter Muntigl
2005 “Generic and Rhetorical Structures of Texts: Two Sides of the Same Coin?” Folia Linguistica 39 (1–2): 75–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gylling, Morten
2013 “The Structure of Discourse: A Corpus-Based Cross-Linguistic Study.” PhD Dissertation, Copenhagen Business School.
Haeseryn, W., K. Romijn, G. Geerts, J. de Rooij, and M. C. van den Toorn
1997 Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. Groningen/Deurne: Martinus Nijhoff/Wolters Plantyn.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K., and Ruqaiya Hasan
1976 Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Haupt, Jaromír
2010 “Palpated, Phonendoscoped, X-rayed and Tomographed: The Structure of Science News in Good Shape.” In Interpretation of Meaning across Discourses, ed. by Renata Jančaříková, 161–174. Masaryk University.Google Scholar
Hobbs, Jerry R.
1985 On the Coherence and Structure of Discourse. Report No. CSLI-85-37, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Lin, Ziheng, Hwee Tou Ng, and Min-Yen Kan
2010 “A PDTB-Styled End-to-End Discourse Parser.” In CoRR , abs/1011.0835.
Mann, William C., and Sandra A. Thompson
1988 “Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a Functional Theory of Text Organization.” Text 8 (3): 243–281.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marcu, Daniel, and Abdessamad Echihabi
2002 “An Unsupervised Approach to Recognizing Discourse Relations.” Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-2002) , Philadelphia, PA, July 7–12.
Marcu, Daniel, Estibalez Amorrortu, and Magdalena Romera
1999 “Experiments in Constructing a Corpus of Discourse Trees.” In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Standards and Tools for Discourse Tagging , 48–57. College Park, MD.
Martin, James R., and David Rose
2003 Working with Discourse. Meaning beyond the Clause. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2008 Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Muntigl, Peter, and Helmut Gruber
2005 “Introduction: Approaches to Genre.” Folia Linguistica 39 (1–2): 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miltsakaki, Eleni, Livio Robaldo, Alan Lee, and Aravind Joshi
2008 “Sense Annotation in the Penn Discourse Treebank.” In Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4919] , 275–286.
O’Donnell, Michael
1997 “RST-Tool: An RST Analysis Tool.” In Proceedings of the 6th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation , Duisburg.
Prasad, Rashmi, Nikhil Dinesh, Alan Lee, Eleni Miltsakaki, Livio Robaldo, Aravind Joshi, and Bonnie Webber
2008 “The Penn Discourse Treebank 2.0.” In Proceedings of the Sixth International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’08) .
Prasad, Rashmi, Aravind Joshi, and Bonnie Webber
2010 “Realization of Discourse Relations by Other Means: Alternative Lexicalizations.” In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2010) .
Pitler, Emily, Mridhula Raghupathy, Hena Mehta, Ani Nenkova, Alan Lee, and Aravind K. Joshi
2008 “Easily Identifiable Discourse Relations.” COLING (Posters) , 87–90.
Posner, Roland
1980 “Semantics and Pragmatics of Sentence Connectives in Natural Language.” In Pragmatics and Speech Act Theory, ed. by John Searle, Ference Kiefer, and Manfred Bierwisch, 169–203. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Redeker, Gisela
1990 “Ideational and Pragmatic Markers of Discourse Structure.” Journal of Pragmatics 14: 367–381. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991 “Linguistic Markers of Discourse Structure.” Linguistics 29: 1139–1172.Google Scholar
2000 “Coherence and Structure in Text and Discourse.” In Abduction, Belief and Context in Dialogue: Studies in Computational Pragmatics, ed. by Harry Bunt, and William Black, 233–263. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 “Discourse Markers as Attentional Cues at Discourse Transitions.” In Approaches to Discourse Particles. Studies in Pragmatics 1, ed. by Kerstin Fischer, 339–358. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Redeker, Gisela, Ildikó Berzlánovich, Nynke van der Vliet, Gosse Bouma, and Markus Egg
2012 “Multi-layer Discourse Annotation of a Dutch Text Corpus.” In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’12) , 2820–2825.
Renkema, Jan
2005 Schrijfwijzer. The Hague: Sdu Uitgevers.Google Scholar
Sanders, Ted
1997 “Semantic and Pragmatic Sources of Coherence: On the Categorization of Coherence Relations in Context.” Discourse Processes 24: 119–147. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Ted, Wilbert Spooren, and Leo Noordman
1992 “Towards a Taxonomy of Coherence Relations.” Discourse Processes 15: 1–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987 Discourse Markers. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stede, Manfred, and Slivan Heintze
2004 “Machine-assisted Rhetorical Structure Annotation.” In Proceedings of the 20th Intl. Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING) , Geneva. Crossref
Stede, Manfred
2004 “The Potsdam Commentary Corpus.” In Proceedings of the 2004 ACL Workshop on Discourse Annotation , 96–102.
Spenader, Jennifer, and Gert Stulp
2007. “Antonymy in Contrast Relations.” In Seventh International Workshop on Computational Semantics , Tilburg.
Swales, John M.
1990 Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taboada, Maite
2006 “Discourse Markers as Signals (or Not) of Rhetorical Relations.” Journal of Pragmatics 38 (4): 567–592. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “Implicit and Explicit Coherence Relations.” In Discourse, of Course, ed. by Jan Renkema, 127–140. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taboada, Maite, and Julia Lavid
2003 “Rhetorical and Thematic Patterns in Scheduling Dialogues: A Generic Characterization.” Functions of Language 10 (2): 147–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taboada, Maite, and William C. Mann
2006 “Rhetorical Structure Theory: Looking Back and Moving Ahead.” Discourse Studies 8 (3): 423–459. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsiplakou, Stavroula, and Georgios Floros
2013 “Never Mind the Text Types, Here’s Textual Force: Towards a Pragmatic Reconceptualization of Text Type.” Journal of Pragmatics 45 (1): 119–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Upton, Thomas A.
2002 “Understanding Direct Mail Letters as a Genre.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 7 (1): 65–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Upton, Thomas A., and Mary A. Cohen
2009 “An Approach to Corpus-based Discourse Analysis: The Move Analysis as Example.” Discourse Studies 11 (5): 585–605. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van der Vliet, Nynke, Ildikó Berzlánovich, Gosse Bouma, Markus Egg, and Gisela Redeker
2011 “Building a Discourse-annotated Dutch Text Corpus.” In Bochumer Linguistische Arbeitsberichte 3, ed. by Stefanie Dipper, and Heike Zinsmeister, 157–171.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A.
1977 Text and Context. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Virtanen, Tuija
1997 “Text Structure.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert, and Chris Bulcaen. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 “Variation across Texts and Discourses: Theoretical and Methodological Perspectives on Text Type and Genre.” In Syntactic Variation and Genre, ed. by Heidrun Dorgeloh, and Anja Wanner, 53–84. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Webber, Bonnie
2009 “Genre Distinctions for Discourse in the Penn TreeBank.” In Proceedings of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th IJCNLP of the AFNLP , Suntec, Singapore, 2–7 August 2009, 674–682.
Williams, Sandra, and Richard Power
2008 “Deriving Rhetorical Complexity Data from the RST-DT Corpus.” In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’08) , 28–30.
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Das, Debopam & Maite Taboada
2018. Signalling of Coherence Relations in Discourse, Beyond Discourse Markers. Discourse Processes 55:8 ► pp. 743 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.