Article published in:
The Pragmatics of Discourse Coherence: Theories and applications
Edited by Helmut Gruber and Gisela Redeker
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 254] 2014
► pp. 179206
References
Arnheim, Rudolf
1969Visual Thinking. London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bateman, John A., and Karl-Heinrich Schmidt
2012Multimodal Film Analysis: How Films Mean. New York, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bateman, John A., and Chiaoi Tseng
2012“Multimodal Narrative Construction in Christopher Nolan’s Memento a Description of Analytic Method.” Visual Communication 11 (1): 91–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bobrow, Daniel G., and Donald A. Norman
1975“Some Principles of Memory Schemata.” In Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Sciences, ed. by Daniel G. Bobrow, and Allan Collins, 131–149. New York: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carrell, Patricia L.
1982“Cohesion is not Coherence.” TESOL Quarterly 16 (4): 479–488. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Day, Jon
2013 [online]. “Please Do Touch.” The Free Library (December 1), http://​www​.thefreelibrary​.com​/Please do touch​.-a0353517299, [visited on 19.02.2014].Google Scholar
De Beaugrande, Robert-Alain, and Wolfgang Dressler
1981Einführung in die Textlinguistik. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ehlich, Konrad
2007Sprache und sprachliches Handeln. Diskurs-Narration-Text-Schrift. Vol. 3. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1978Language as Social Semiotic. The Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
2002 “The De-Automatization of Grammar: From Priestly’s An Inspector Calls.” In The Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday, Vol. 2, 126–148. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K., and Ruqaiya Hasan
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya
1989Linguistics, Language and Verbal Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huemer, Birgit
2008a“Representations of Individual and Mass: Modelling Experience through Multiple Modes in Digital Art.” In From Language to Multimodality. New Developments in the Study of Ideational Meaning, ed. by Carys Jones, and Eija Ventola, 255–274. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
2008b“A Semiotic Approach to Visitor Interaction, Participation and Perspective in Digital Arts.” In New Realities: Being Syncretic. Consciousness Reframed: The Planetary Collegium’s IXth International Research Conference Series: Edition Angewandte, ed. by Roy Ascott, Gerald Bast, and Wolfgang Fiel, 144–147. Wien: Springer.Google Scholar
2014Semiotik der digitalen Medienkunst. Göttingen: V&R unipress.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1985“Poetry of Grammar and Grammar of Poetry.” In Jakobson, Roman: Verbal Art, Verbal Sign, Verbal Time, ed. by Krystyna Pomorska, and Stephen Rudy, 37–46. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jewitt, Carey
2005“Multimodality, ‘‘Reading’’, and ‘‘Writing’’ for the 21st Century.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 26 (3): 315–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Technology, Literacy and Learning: A Multimodal Approach. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kahn, Douglas
2001Noise, Water, Meet. A History of Sound in the Arts. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kamalski, Judith, Ted Sanders, and Leo Lentz
2008“Coherence Marking, Prior Knowledge, and Comprehension of Informative and Persuasive Texts: Sorting Things Out.” Discourse Processes 45: 323–345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kress, Gunther
2003Literacy in the New Media Age. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen
2001Multimodal Discourse. The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
2006Reading Images. The Grammar of Visual Design, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Martin, James R.
1992English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R., and David Rose
2003Working with Discourse. Meaning beyond the Clause. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martinec, Radan
1998 “Cohesion in Action.” Semiotica 120 (1/2): 161–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000“Rhythm in Multimodal Texts.” Leonardo 33 (4): 289–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martinec, Radan, and Andrew Salway
2005“A System for Image-Text Relations in New (and Old) Media.” Visual Communication 4 (3): 337–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mills, Kathy A.
2010 “A Review of the “Digital Turn” in the New Literacy Studies.” Review of Educational Research 80 (2): 246–271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Jerry L., and Manfred Sellner
1980“Discourse and Linguistic Theory.” In Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension: Perspectives from Cognitive Psychology, Linguistics, Artificial Intelligence, and Education, ed. by Rand J. Spiro, Bertram C. Bruce, and William F. Brewer, 165–200. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Norris, Sigrid
2004Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Norris, Sigrid, and Rodney H. Jones
(eds) 2005Discourse in Action. Introducing Mediated Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
O’Toole, Michael
1994The Language of Displayed Art, new edition. London: Leicester ­University Press.Google Scholar
Royce, Terry
1999Visual-Verbal Intersemiotic Complementarity in the Economist Magazine. PhD. Dissertation, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Royce, Terry D., and Wendy L. Bowcher
(eds) 2007New Directions in the Analysis of Multimodal Discourse. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sanders, Ted, Jentine Land, and Gerben Mulder
2007“Linguistic Markers of Coherence Improve Text Comprehension in Functional Contexts.” Information Design Journal 15 (3): 219–235. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, Murray R.
1986The Thinking Ear. Toronto: Arcana.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1986Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Spooren, Wilbert, and Ted Sanders
2008“The Acquisition Order of Coherence Relations: On Cognitive Complexity in Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 40 (12): 2003–2026. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tseng, Chiaoi, and John A. Bateman
2012“Multimodal Narrative Construction in Christopher Nolan’s Memento a Description of Analytic Method.” Visual Communication 11 (1): 91–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, Theo
1991“Conjunctive Structure in Documentary Film and Television.” Journal of Media and Cultural Studies 5 (1): 76–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999Speech, Music, Sound. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
2005Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Data samples in this paper

Bystander
(2005): Ross Gibson and Kate Richards: [Online]: http://​www​.lifeafterwartime​.com/, [visited on 06.08.2012].Google Scholar
Emotional Traffic (e-traffic)
(2005): Maurice Benayoun and Jean-Baptiste Barrière, music and software by Jean-Baptiste Barrière, software in co-production with V2 Lab, Birgit ­Lichtenegger, Artem Baguinsky, Marloes de Valk: [Online]: http://​www​.benayoun​.com, [visited on 06.08.2012].Google Scholar
Listening Post
(2001): Ben Rubin and Mark Hansen: [Online]: http://​earstudio​.com​/2010​/09​/29​/listening​-post/, [visited on 06.08.2012].Google Scholar
Pussy Weevil
(2003): Julian Bleecker and Marina Zurkow: [Online]: http://​www​.we​-make​-money​-not​-art​.com​/archives​/2005​/09​/pussy​-weevil​.php, [visited on 06.08.2012].Google Scholar
Telematic Dreaming
(1992): Paul Sermon: [Online]: http://​www​.paulsermon​.org/, [visited on 06.08.2012].Google Scholar
Tempest
(2004): Erich Berger: [Online]:http://​randomseed​.org​/tempest/, [visited on 06.08.2012].Google Scholar
The Legible City
(1989): Jeffrey Shaw: [Online]: http://​www​.jeffrey​-shaw​.net, [visited on 06.08.2012].Google Scholar
The Messenger
(1998, new version 2005): Paul De Marinis: [Online]: http://​www​.stanford​.edu​/~demarini/, [visited on 06.08.2012].Google Scholar