Participation structures in Twitter interaction
Arguing for the broadcaster role
In offering a new platform for electronically-mediated interaction, the Twitter
medium brings with it new implications for participation. Building on
Goffman’s (1981) production format, this paper argues for the role of broadcaster,
a “followable” party that makes talk available to recipients, as a participant
in Twitter interaction. Evidence from a corpus of tweets relating to the
National Hockey League (NHL) is presented, showing that the broadcaster role
can be separated from Goffman’s traditional roles of animator, author, and principal.
The broadcaster, however, is shown to be held responsible for talk produced
for the account, even when the broadcaster is demonstrably distinct from
other production roles. Additionally, the broadcaster is shown to be a potential
target of address in tweets from other Twitter users. This evidence suggests that
users see the broadcaster as an active participant in the production of talk, and
should be included in participation frameworks for Twitter interaction.
References
Baym, Nancy K
2010 Personal Connections in the Digital Age. Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity.
Berglund, Therese Örnberg
2009 “
Multimodal Student Interaction Online: An Ecological Perspective.”
ReCALL 21: 186–205. �
Charitonos, Koula, Canan Blake, Eileen Scanlon, and Ann Jones
2012 “
Museum Learning via Social and Mobile Technologies: (How) Can Online Interactions Enhance Visitor Experience?”
British Journal of Educational Technology 43 (5): 802–819.
Dayter, Daria
2013 “
Twitter as a Means of Class Participation: Making Student Reading Visible.”
Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 1: 1–21.
Deller, Ruth A
2011 “
Twittering on: Audience Research and Participation using Twitter.”
Participations 8 (1): 216–245.
Gallant, Linda M., Cynthia Irizarry, Gloria Boone, and Gary L. Kreps
2011 “
Promoting Participatory Medicine with Social Media: New Media Applications on Hospital Websites that Enhance Health Education and e-patients’ Voice.”
Journal of Participatory Medicine 3. Accessed on October 25, 2013:
[URL]
Gibson, James J
1979 The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Goffman, Erving
1963 Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings [Kindle edition]. Retrieved from Amazon.com.
Goffman, Erving
1964 “
The Neglected Situation.”
American Anthropologist 66 (6): 133–136.
Goffman, Erving
1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Harrington, Stephen, Tim Highfield, and Axel Bruns
2012 “
More than a Backchannel: Twitter and Television.” In
Audience Interactivity and Participation, ed. by
Jose Manuel Noguera, 13–17. Brussels: COST Action Transforming Audiences, Transforming Societies.
Holton, Avery, Summer Harlow, and Seth Lewis
2011 “
The Evolution of Participatory Journalism.” In
The Future of News: An Agenda of Perspectives, 2nd ed., ed. by
Kelly Kaufhold,
Amber Willard Hinsley, and
Seth C. Lewis, 183–198. San Diego, CA: Cognella.
Honeycutt, Courtenay, and Susan Herring
2009 “Beyond Microblogging: Conversation and Collaboration via Twitter.” Proceedings of the Forty-Second Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Press.
Hutchby, Ian
2001 “Technologies, Texts and Affordances.” Sociology 35: 441–456.
Hymes, Dell
1972 “
Models for the Interaction of Language and Social Life.” In
Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, ed. by
John J. Gumperz and
Dell Hymes, 35–71. New York: Holt.
Hymes, Dell
1974 Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Irvine, Judith T
1996 “
Shadow Conversations: The Indeterminacy of Participant Roles.” In
Natural Histories of Discourse, ed. by
Michael Silverstein and
Greg Urban, 131–159. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Johannessen, Marius Rohde
2010 “
Genres of Participation in Social Networking Systems: A Study of the 2009 Norwegian Parliamentary Election.”
Proceedings of the Second International Conference on eParticipation
. Lausanne, September.
Jones, Rodney H
2009 “
‘Inter-Activity’: How New Media Can Help Us Understand Old Media.”
Language and New Media: Linguistic, Cultural, and Technological Evolutions, ed. by
Charley Rowe and
Eva Lia Wyss, 13–32. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Junco, Reynol
2011 “
The Relationship between Frequency of Facebook Use, Participation in Facebook Activities, and Student Engagement.”
Computers & Education 58 (1): 162–171.
Lange, Patricia G
2007 “
Searching for the ‘You’ in ‘YouTube’: An Analysis of Online Response Ability.”
Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings 1: 36–50. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Levinson, Stephen C
1988 “
Putting Linguistics on a Proper Footing: Exploration’s in Goffman’s Concepts of Participation.”
Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, ed. by
Paul Drew and
Anthony J. Wootton, 161–227. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Licoppe, Christian
2004 “
‘Connected’ Presence: The Emergence of a New Repertoire for Managing Social Relationships in a Changing Communication Technoscape.”
Environment and Planning D 22 (1): 135–156.
Marcoccia, Michel
2004 “
On-line Polylogues: Conversation Structure and Participation Framework in Internet Newsgroups.”
Journal of Pragmatics 36: 115–145.
Marwick, Alice E., and Danah Boyd
2010 “
I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience.”
New Media & Society 13: 114–133.
Murthy, Dhiraj
2012 “
Towards a Sociological Understanding of Social Media: Theorizing Twitter.”
Sociology 46 (6): 1059–1073.
Myers, Greg
2010 Discourse of Blogs and Wikis. London and New York: Continuum.
O’Keeffe, Anne
2006 Investigating Media Discourse. London and New York: Routledge.
Pegoraro, Ann
2010 “
Look Who’s Talking – Athletes on Twitter: A Case Study.”
International Journal of Sport Communication 3: 501–514.
Rowe, Charley, and Eva Lia Wyss
2009 “
Introduction.” In
Language and New Media: Linguistic, Cultural, and Technological Evolutions, ed. by
Charley Rowe and
Eva Lia Wyss, 1–9. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Scollon, Ronald
1998 Mediated Discourse as Social Interaction : A Study of News Discourse. London and New York: Longman.
Vitak, Jessica, Paul Zube, Andrew Smock, Caleb T. Carr, Nicole Ellison, and Cliff Lampe
2011 “
It’s Complicated: Facebook Users’ Political Participation in the 2008 Election.”
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, & Social Networking 14 (3): 107–114.
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Chovanec, Jan & Villy Tsakona
[no author supplied]
2017.
The digital agora of social media: Introduction.
Discourse, Context & Media 19
► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.