Article published in:
Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions
Edited by Marta Dynel and Jan Chovanec
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 256] 2015
► pp. 99133
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Chovanec, Jan
2018.  In The Pragmatics of Irony and Banter [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 30],  pp. 165 ff. Crossref logo
Haugh, Michael, Wei-Lin Melody Chang & Dániel Z. Kádár
2015. “Doing deference”. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 25:1  pp. 73 ff. Crossref logo
Mitchell, Nathaniel
2021. Duelling contexts: how action misalignment leads to impoliteness in a courtroom. Journal of Politeness Research 0:0 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Arendholz, Jenny
2013(In)appropriate Online Behaviour: A Pragmatic Analysis of Message Board Relations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan
1991The Language of News Media. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bolander, Brook
2013Language and Power in Blogs. Interaction, Agreements and Disagreements. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bou-Franch, Patricia, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
2012 “Social Interaction in YouTube Text-based Polylogues: A Study of Coherence.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17: 501–521. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boxer, Diana
1993 “Social Distance and Speech Behaviour: The Case of Indirect Complaints.” Journal of Pragmatics 19: 103–125. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996 “Ethnographic Interviewing as a Research Tool in Speech Act Analysis: The Case of Complaints.” In Speech Acts Across Cultures, ed. by Susan Gass and Joyce Neu, 217–239. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Burgess, Jean, and Joshua Green
2008 “Agency and Controversy in the YouTube Community.” Paper presented at IR 9.0: Rethinking Communities, Rethinking Place – Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR) Conference , 15–18 October 2008, IT University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Chan, Annie Hau-Nang
2008 “ ‘Life in Happy Land’: Using Virtual Space and Doing Motherhood in Hong Kong.” Gender, Place and Culture 15 (2): 169–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Hui-Jung
2009 “Online Social Support: Which Posts were Answered?Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia 8 (1): 31–46.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2012 “On Affectivity and Preference in Response to Rejection.” Text & Talk 32 (4): 453–475.Google Scholar
Dresner, Eli, and Susan Herring
2010 “Functions of the Nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and Illocutionary Force.” Communication Theory 20: 249–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul
1998 “Complaints about Transgressions and Misconduct.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 31 (3/4): 295–325. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul, and Elizabeth Holt
1988 “Complainable Matters: The use of Idiomatic Expressions in making Complaints.” Social Problems 35 (4): 398–417. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul, and Traci Walker
2009 “ Going too Far: Complaining, Escalating and Dissafiliation.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (12): 2400–2414. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dynel, Marta
2011a “Revisiting Goffman’s Postulates on Participant Statuses in Verbal Interaction.” Language and Linguistic Compass 5 (7): 454–465. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011b “ ‘You Talking to Me?’ The Viewer as a Ratified Listener to Film Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (6): 1628–1644. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “Participation Framework Underlying YouTube Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 73: 37–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Derek
2005 “Moaning, Whinging and Laughing: The Subjective Side of Complaints.” Discourse Studies 7 (1): 5–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eisenchlas, Susana
2011 “On-line Interactions as a Iesource to Raise Pragmatic Awareness.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 51–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “Gendered Discursive Practice On-line.” Journal of Pragmatics 44: 335–345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ess, Charles
2009Digital Media Ethics. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Ess, CharlesAssociation for Internet Researchers
and 2002 “Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee.” Association for Internet Researchers. Available at http://​aoir​.org​/reports​/ethics​.pdf, accessed January 30, 2014.
Eysenbach, Gunther, and James E. Till
2001 “Ethical Issues in Qualitative Research on Internet Communities.” BMJ 323: 1103–1105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feng, Bo
2009 “Testing an Integrated Model of Advice giving in Supportive Interactions.” Human Communication Research 29: 115–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus, and Patricia Bou-Franch
2013 “Relational Work in Anonymous, Asynchronous Communication: A Study of (dis)affiliation in YouTube.” In Research Trends in Intercultural Pragmatics, ed. by Istvan Kecskes and Jesus Romero-Trillo, 343–365. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
1967Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff, and Anna Wierzbicka
2014Words and Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1978 “Response Cries.” Language 54 (4): 787–815. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1979 “Footing.” Semiotica 25 (1): 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1981Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Daena
2000 “Soliciting Advice: The Role of Sequential Placement in Mitigating Face Threat.” Communication Monographs 67 (1): 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
González-Lloret, Marta
2011 “Conversation Analysis of Computer-mediated Communication.” CALICO Journal 28 (2): 308–325. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie Harness Goodwin
2004 “Participation.” In A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, 222–244. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael
2013 “Im/politeness, Social Practice and the Participation Order.” Journal of Pragmatics 58: 52–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael, Wei-Lin Melody Chang, and Dániel Z. Kádár
Forthcoming. “‘Doing Deference’: Identities and Relational Practices in Chinese Online Discussion Boards.” Pragmatics.
Heinemann, Trine and Veronique Traverso
2009 “Complaining in Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (12): 2381–2384. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
1984Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
2011 “Territories of Knowledge, Territories of Experience: Empathic Moments in Interaction.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 159–183. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and Anna Lindström
2012 “Knowlege, Empathy, and Emotion in a Medical Encounter.” In Emotion in Interaction, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 256–273. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and Sue Sefi
1992 “Dilemmas of Advice: Aspects of the Delivery and Reception of Advice in Interactions between Health Visitors and First Time Mothers.” In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 359–419. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Herring, Susan
2010 “Computer-mediated Conversation: Introduction and Overview.” Language at Internet 7 (Article 2). Available at http://​www​.languageatinternet​.org​/articles​/2010​/2801, accessed January 30, 2014.Google Scholar
Hinkel, Eli
1994 “Appropriateness of Advice as L2 Solidarity Strategy.” RELC Journal 25: 71–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997 “Appropriateness of Advice: DCT and Multiple Choice Data.” Applied Linguistics 18 (1): 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1984 “On Stepwise Transition from Talk about a Trouble to Inappropriately Next-positioned Matters.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 191–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1988 “On the Sequential Organization of Troubles Talk in Ordinary Conversation.” Social Problems 35 (4): 418–441. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail, and John R. Lee
1981 “The Rejection of Advice: Managing the Problematic Convergence of a ‘Troubles-telling’ and a ‘Service Encounter’.” Journal of Pragmatics 5: 399–422. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z, Michael Haugh, and Wei-Lin Melody Chang
2013 “Aggression and Perceived National Face Threats in Mainland Chinese and Taiwanese CMC Discussion Boards.” Multilingua 32 (3): 343–372. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
2004 “Introducing Polylogue.” Journal of Pragmatics 36: 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kouper, Inna
2010 “The Pragmatics of Peer Advice in a LiveJournal Community.” Language at Internet 7 (Article 1). Available at http://​www​.languageatinternet​.org​/articles​/2010​/2464, accessed January 30, 2014.Google Scholar
Koshik, Irene
2005Beyond Rhetorical Questions: Assertive Questions in Everyday Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuo, Sai-Hua
1999 “ ‘To be a Woman is Extremely Bothersome’: How Young Chinese Women Talk about their Predicaments.” The Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 29 (4): 511–532.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, Irit
2013 “Introduction: Institutional Computer-mediated Troubles Talk.” Language at Internet 10 (Article 2). Available at http://​www​.languageatinternet​.org​/articles​/2013​/kupferberg, accessed January 30, 2014.Google Scholar
Kupferberg, Irit, and Itay Hess
2013 “ ‘Me and My Guide Poodle, Lara, are about to Begin Our Third Year at the Hebrew University: Adults with Visual Impairment and Blindness Position themselves Interactively in Computer-mediated Conversations.” Language at Internet 10 (Article 6). Available at http://​www​.languageatinternet​.org​/articles​/2013​/kupferberg2, accessed January 30, 2014.Google Scholar
Lamerichs, Joyce, and Hedwig Te Molder
2003 “Computer-mediated Communication: from a Cognitive to a Discursive Model.” New Media & Society 5 (4): 451–473. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1988 “Putting Linguistics on a Proper Footing: Explorations in Goffman’s Concepts of Participation.” In Erving Goffman. Exploring the Interaction Order, ed. by Paul Drew and Anthony Wootton, 161–227. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Lii-Shih, Yu-Hwei
1988Conversational Politeness and Foreign Language Teaching. Taipei: Crane Publishing.Google Scholar
Lindström, Anna, and Sorjonen, Marja-Leena
2013 “Affiliation in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 350–369. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam
2006Advice Online. Advice-Giving in an American Internet Health Column. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria
2009 “ ‘You’re Barking Mad, I’m Out’: Impoliteness and Broadcast Talk.” Journal of Politeness Research 5 (2): 159–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, and Patricia Bou-Franch
2011 “On-line Polylogues and Impoliteness: The Case of Postings sent in Response to the Obama Reggaeton YouTube Video.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 2578–2593. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marcoccia, Michel
2004 “On-line Polylogues: Conversation Structure and Participation Framework in Internet Newsgroups.” Journal of Pragmatics 36: 115–145. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Markham, Annette, and Elizabeth Buchanan
2012 “Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research. Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (Version 2.0).” Available at http://​aoir​.org​/reports​/ethics2​.pdf, accessed January 30, 2014.
Morris, Merrill, and Christine Ogan
1996 “The Internet as Mass Media.” Journal of Communication 46 (1): 39–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, Phillip
2006 “Telling about Problems and giving Advice in an Internet Discussion Forum: Some Discourse Features.” Discourse Studies 8 (4): 531–548. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “Online Advice in Japanese: Giving Advice in an Internet Discussion Forum.” In Advice in Discourse, ed. by Holger Limberg and Miriam Locher, 255–280. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pederson, Sarah, and Janet Smithson
2010 “Membership and Activity in an Online Parenting Community.” In Handbook of Research on Discourse Behaviour and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction ed. by Rotimi Taiwo, 88–103. Hershey, Pennsylvania: IGI Global. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Planchenault, Gaëlle
2010 “Virtual Community and Politeness: The Use of Female Markers of Identity and Solidarity in a Transvetites’ Website.” Journal of Politeness Research 6 (1): 83–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1978 “Attributions of Responsibility: Blamings.” Sociology 12 (1): 115–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1984 “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita, and John Heritage
2013 “Preference.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 210–228. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita, and Jenny Mandelbaum
2005 “Conversation Analytic Approaches to the Relevance and Uses of Relationship Categories in Interaction.” In Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Kristine Fitch and Robert Sanders, 149–171. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Pudlinski, Christopher
2005 “Doing Empathy and Sympathy: Caring Responses to Troubles Tellings on a Peer Support Line.” Discourse Studies 7 (3): 267–288. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rodham, Karen, and Jeff Gavin
2006 “The Ethics of using the Internet to Collect Qualitative Research Data.” Research Ethics Review 2 (3): 92–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1987 “On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation.” In Talk and Social Organisation, ed. by Graham Button and John R. Lee, 54–69. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel
1995 “Parties and Talking Together: Two Ways in which Numbers are Significant for Talk-in-interaction.” In Situated Order: Studies in the Social Organization of Talk and Embodied Activities, ed. by Paul ten Have and George Psathas, 31–42. Washington, D.C.: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis & University Press of America.Google Scholar
2007Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sharkey, Siobhan, Janet Smithson, Elaine Hewis, Ray Jones, Tobit Emmens, Tamsin Ford, and Christabel Owens
2012 “Supportive Interchanges and Face-work as ‘Protective Talk’ in an Online Self-harm Support Forum.” Communication & Medicine 9 (1): 71–82.Google Scholar
Shaw, Chloe, and Alexa Hepburn
2013 “Managing the Moral Implications of Advice in Informal Settings.” Research on Language in Social Interaction 46 (4): 344–362. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shum, Winnie, and Cynthia Lee
2013 “(Im)politeness and Disagreement in Two Hong Kong Internet Forums.” Journal of Pragmatics 50: 52–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sillence, Elizabeth
2013 “Giving and Receiving Peer Advice in an Online Breast Cancer Support Group.” Cyberpsychology, Behaviour and Social Networking 16 (6): 480–485. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smithson, Janet, Siobhan Sharkey, Elaine Hewis, Ray Jones, Tobit Emmens, Tamsin Ford, and Christabel Owens
2011 “Problem Presentation and Responses on an Online Forum for Young People who Self-harm.” Discourse Studies 13 (4): 487–501. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steensig, Jakob, and Paul Drew
2008 “Introduction: Questioning and Affiliation/Disaffiliation in Interaction.” Discourse Studies 10 (1): 5–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya
2008 “Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation during Storytelling: When Nodding is a Token of Affiliation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (1): 31–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stommel, Wyke
2008 “Conversation Analysis and Community of Practice as Approaches to Studying Online Community.” Language at Internet 5 (Article 5). Available at http://​www​.languageatinternet​.org​/articles​/2008​/1537, accessed January 30, 2014.Google Scholar
Vandergriff, Ilona
2013 “Emotive Communication Online: A Contextual Analysis of Computer-mediated Communication (CMC) Cues.” Journal of Pragmatics 51: 1–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vásquez, Camilla
2011 “Complaints Online: The Case of TripAdvisor .” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1707–1717. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xie, Huimin
2013 “How do People give Advice in Wu Chinese?” In Cross-Culturally Speaking, Speaking Cross-Culturally, ed. by Bert Peeters, Kerry Mullan, and Christine Béal, 141–182. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Waring, Hansun Zhang
2007 “The Multi-functionality of Accounts in Advice Giving.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 11 (3): 367–391. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
2012 “ ‘Advice’ in English and in Russian: A Contrastive and Cross-cultural Perspective.” In Advice in Discourse, ed. by Holger Limberg and Miriam Locher, 309–332. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar