This paper addresses the issue of impoliteness in the context of the verisimilitude
of film discourse. Taking as its departure point the notion of participation
framework encompassing two levels of communication underlying film
interaction and drawing on the recent developments in the relevant scholarship
on impoliteness, the present article puts forward a number of hypotheses
about how impoliteness, albeit extremely frequent and superfluous, is plausibly
rendered and does not strike viewers as being inconceivable given the way it is
realised on the characters’ level of communication. To this end, a few pragmatic
factors are discussed: impoliteness as a character trait, the speaker’s power,
sanctioning impoliteness within a community of practice, and the nature of
hearers’ reactions to impoliteness.
2011 “Using Film as Linguistic Specimen.” In Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Film and Television Series, ed. by Roberta Piazza, Monika Bednarek, and Fabio Rossi, 47–67. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bednarek, Monika
2010The Language of Fictional Television: Drama and Identity. London and New York: Continuum.
Bednarek, Monika
2011 “The Stability of the Televisual Character.” In Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Film and Television Series, ed. by Roberta Piazza, Monika Bednarek and Fabio Rossi, 185–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Beebe, Leslie
1995 “Polite Fictions: Instrumental Rudeness as Pragmatic Competence.” In Linguistics and the Education of Language Teachers: Ethnolinguistic, Psycholinguistics and Sociolinguistic Aspects, ed. by James Alatis, Carolyn A. Straehle, Brent Gallenberger, and Maggie Ronkin, 154–168. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.
Bircher, Gary, Robert Weiss, and John Vincent
1975 “Multi-method Analysis of Social Reinforcement Exchange between Martially Distressed and Non-distressed Spouse and Stranger Dyads”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 31: 349–360.
Bousfield, Derek
2007 “Beginnings, Middles and Ends: A Biopsy of the Dynamics of Impolite Exchanges.” Journal of Pragmatics 39: 2185–2216.
Bousfield, Derek
2008a “Impoliteness in the Struggle for Power.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher, 127–153. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
2010 “Researching Impoliteness and Rudeness: Issues and Definitions.” In Interpersonal Pragmatics, ed. by Miriam Locher and Sage L. Graham, 102–134. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bousfield, Derek, and Jonathan Culpeper
2008“Impoliteness: Eclecticism and Diaspora. An Introduction to the Special Edition.” Journal of Politeness Research 4: 161–168.
Brown, Penelope, and Steven Levinson
1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bubel, Claudia
2008 “Film Audiences as Overhearers.” Journal of Pragmatics 40: 55–71.
Craig, Robert, Karen Tracy, and Frances Spisak
1986 “The Discourse of Requests: Assessment of a Politeness Approach.” Human Communication Research 12: 437–468.
Culpeper, Jonathan
1996 “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics 25: 349–367.
Culpeper, Jonathan
1998 “(Im)politeness in Drama.” In Studying Drama: From Text to Context, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Mick Short, and Peter Verdonk, 83–95. London: Routledge.
Culpeper, Jonathan
2001Language and Characterisation: People in Plays and Other Texts. London: Longman.
Culpeper, Jonathan
2005 “Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link.” Journal of Politeness Research 1 (1): 35–72.
Culpeper, Jonathan
2008 “Reflections on Impoliteness, Relational Work and Power.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher, 17–44. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Culpeper, Jonathan
2010 “Conventionalised Impoliteness Formulae”. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 3232–3245.
Culpeper, Jonathan
2011Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Culpeper, Jonathan
2012 “(Im) Politeness: Three Issues.” Journal of Pragmatics 44: 1128–1133.
Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield, and Anne Wichmann
2003 “Impoliteness Revisited: With Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1545–1579.
Dynel, Marta
2010a “On ‘Revolutionary Road’: A Proposal for Extending the Gricean Model of Communication to Cover Multiple Hearers.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 6 (2): 283–304.
Dynel, Marta
2010b “Not Hearing Things – Hearer/Listener Categories in Polylogues.” mediAzioni 9. [URL]
Dynel, Marta
2011a “Stranger than Fiction. A Few Methodological Notes on Linguistic Research in Film Discourse.” Brno Studies in English 37 (1): 41–61.
Dynel, Marta
2011b “ ‘You Talking to Me?’ The Viewer as a Ratified Listener to Film Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1628–1644.
2015 (Forthcoming). “Conceptualising Conversational Humour as (Im)politeness: The Case of Film Talk.” Journal of Politeness Research.
Eckert, Penelope, and Sally McConnell-Ginet
1992 “Think Practically and Look Locally: Language and Gender as Community-based Practice.” Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 461–90.
Eckert, Penelope, and Sally McConnell-Ginet
1998 “Communities of Practice: Where Language, Gender and Power all Live.” In Language and Gender: A Reader, ed. by Jennifer Coates, 484–494. Oxford: Blackwell.
Eelen, Gino
2001A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.
Harris, Sandra
2001 “Being Politically Impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adversarial Political Discourse.” Discourse and Society 12 (4): 451–472.
Haugh, Michael, and Derek Bousfield
2012 “Mock Impoliteness in Interactions Amongst Australian and British Speakers of English.” Journal of Pragmatics 44: 1099–1114.
Holmes, Janet, Meredith Marra, and Bernadette Vine
2012 “Politeness and Impoliteness in New Zealand English Workplace Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 44: 1063–1076.
Infante, Dominic, and Charles Wigley III
1986 “Verbal Aggressiveness: An Interpersonal Model and Measure.” Communication Monographs 53: 61–69.
Kasper, Gabriele
1990 “Linguistic Politeness. Current Research Issues.” Journal of Pragmatics 14: 193–218.
2000Overhearing Film Dialogue. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger
1991Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
Leech, Geoffrey
1983Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Levinson, Stephen
1992 “Activity Types and Language.” In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 66–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pressccc.
Limberg, Holger
2008 “Threats in Conflict Talk: Impoliteness and Manipulation.” In Impoliteness in Language. Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Derek Bousfield and Miriam Locher, 155–179. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Limberg, Holger
2009 “Impoliteness and Threat Responses.” Journal of Pragmatics 41(7): 1376–1394.
Locher, Miriam
2004Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements in Oral Communication. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Locher, Miriam, and Derek Bousfield
2008 “Introduction: Impoliteness and Power in Language.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher, 1–13. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Locher, Miriam, and Richard Watts
2005 “Politeness Theory and Relational Work.” Journal of Politeness Research 1 (1): 9–33.
Locher, Miriam, and Richard Watts
2008 “Relational Work and Impoliteness: Negotiating Norms of Linguistic Behaviour.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher, 77–99. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
McHoul, Alec
1987 “An Initial Investigation of the Usability of Fictional Conversation for doing Conversational Analysis.” Semiotica 67: 83–104.
Meier, Ardith
1995 “Defining Politeness: Universality in Appropriateness.” Language Sciences 17 (4): 345–356.
2003Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mills, Sara
2005 “Gender and Impoliteness.” Journal of Politeness Research 1 (2): 263–280.
Mullany, Louise
2008 “ ‘Stop Hassling Me!’ Impoliteness, Power and Gender Identity in the Professional Workplace.” In Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Derek Bousfield and Miriam Locher, 231–251. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Palmer, Jerry
1987The Logic of the Absurd. On Film and Television Comedy. London: BFI Publishing.
Piazza, Roberta
1999 “Dramatic Discourse Approached from a Conversational Analysis Perspective.” Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1001–1023.
Piazza, Roberta
2006 “The Representation of Conflict in the Discourse of Italian Melodrama.” Journal of Pragmatics 38 (12): 2087–104.
Piazza, Roberta
2011The Discourse of Italian Cinema and Beyond: Let Cinema Speak. London: Continuum.
2010Television Dramatic Dialogue. A Sociolinguistic Study. New York: Oxford University Press.
Schnurr, Stephanie, Meredith Marra, and Janet Holmes
2008 “Impoliteness as a means of Contesting and Challenging Power Relations in the Workplace.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher, 211–230. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Spencer-Oatey, Helen
2005“(Im)politeness, Face and Perceptions of Rapport: Unpackaging their Bases and Interrelationships.”Journal of Politeness Research 1 (1): 95–119.
Terkourafi, Marina
2008 “Toward a Unified Theory of Politeness, Impoliteness, and Rudeness.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher, 45–74. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Tracy, Karen
2008 “ ‘Reasonable Hostility’ – Situation-appropriate Face Attack.” Journal of Politeness Research 4: 169–191.
Watts, Richard
1989 “Relevance and Relational Work: Linguistic Politeness as Politic Behaviour.” Multilingua 8 (2–3): 131–166.
Watts, Richard
1991Power in Family Discourse. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Watts, Richard
2003Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Watts, Richard
2005“Linguistic Politeness Research: Quo vadis?.” In Politeness in Language. Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, 2nd ed. by Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide and Konrad Ehlich, xi–xlvii. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Watts, Richard, Sachiko Ide and Konrad Ehlich
1992 “Introduction.” In Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, ed. by Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich, 1–17. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cited by
Cited by 7 other publications
Cao, Ying, Chong Han, Xiangdong Liu & Adrian Hale
2021. ‘She is like a Yakshini’. The European Journal of Humour Research 9:4 ► pp. 110 ff.
HIRATA, ICHIRO
2021. IMPLICATURES OF VOCATIVES AND THEIR THEORETICAL IMPLICATIONS. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 37:2 ► pp. 161 ff.
Khafaga, Ayman
2023. Beyond relational work: a psycho-pragmatic analysis of impoliteness in Shakespeare’s King Lear. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 10:1
Kirner-Ludwig, Monika
2022. Data collection methods applied in studies in the journalIntercultural Pragmatics(2004–2020): a scientometric survey and mixed corpus study. Intercultural Pragmatics 19:4 ► pp. 459 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.