Cover not available
Part of
Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions
Edited by Marta Dynel and Jan Chovanec
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 256] 2015
► pp. 211–231

A participation perspective on television evening news in the age of immediacy

In a context of intense media competition and a contemporary culture of talk, traditional TV news has devised ways to make news more interactive and closer to the TV audience. In British TV news programmes, the live exchange between news presenter and correspondent has been identified as a key site for discourse in a dialogic mode (Montgomery 2007; Tolson 2006). This study adopts a participation framework approach to analyse the live exchanges in a corpus of BBC evening news programmes over time. Findings indicate that while the frequency of live exchanges is sustained, they become shorter and less interactive, at the same time as other strategies are adopted to give the impression of extensive, immediate reporting. What emerges is an overriding concern with giving the appearance of “liveness”, sacrificing the interactive format of the traditional live exchange. The “token interactivity” which results may not encourage the kind of audience participation that facilitates understanding and retention.

Published online: 12 February 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.256.09lom
References
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finnegan
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
Chovanec, Jan
2009 “Simulation of Spoken Interaction in Written Online Media Texts.” Brno Studies in English 35 (2): 109–128. http://digilib.phil.muni.cz/handle/11222.digilib/105142.Google Scholar
2010 “Online Discussion and Interaction: The Case of Live Text Commentary.” In Cases on Online Discussion and Interaction: Experiences and Outcomes, ed. by Leonard Shedletsky and Joan E. Aitken, 234–251. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cushion, Stephen, and Justin Lewis
(eds) 2010 The Rise of 24-Hour News Television Global Perspectives. New York and Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta
2010 “Not Hearing Things – Hearer/Listener Categories in Polylogues.” mediAzioni 9. [URL].Google Scholar
Ekstrom, Mats
2002 “Epistemologies of TV Journalism: A Theoretical Framework.” Journalism 3 (3): 259–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1995 Media Discourse. London and New York: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
1979 “Footing”. Semiotica 25: 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
2007 “Interactive Footing.” In Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction, ed. by Elizabeth Holt and Rebecca Clift, 16–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haarman, Louann
2004 “ ‘John, What’s going on?’ Some Features of Live Exchanges on Television News.” In Corpora and Discourse, ed. by Alan Partington, John Morley, and Louann Haarman, 71–87. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Haarman, Louann, and Linda Lombardo
(eds) 2009 Evaluation and Stance in War News. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H
2011 “Mass Media.” In Pragmatics in Practice, Handbook of Pragmatics Highlights 9, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren, 248–263. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993 “The Discourse Marker well. A Relevance-theoretical Account.” Journal of Pragmatics 19 (5): 435–453. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C
1988 “Putting Linguistics on a Proper Footing: Explorations in Goffman’s Participation Framework.” In Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, ed. by Paul Drew and Anthony Wootton, 161–227. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Lombardo, Linda
2009 “Positioning and Stance in TV News Reporting of the 2003 Iraq War: The Anchor on CBS and the News Presenter on BBC.” In Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies on the Iraq Conflict, ed. by John Morley and Paul Bayley, 141–164. Abington, Oxon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lorenzo-Dos, Nuria
2009 Television Discourse: Analysing Language in the Media. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Martin
2007 The Discourse of Broadcast News. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
O’Keeffe, Anne
2006 Investigating Media Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Owen, Marion
1983 Apologies and Remedial Interchanges. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Scannell, Paddy
1996 Radio, Television and Modern Life. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Scott, Mike
2012 Wordsmith Tools 6.0.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987 Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Sara, and Andreas H. Jucker
2000 “ Actually and other Markers of an Apparent Discrepancy between Propositional Attitudes of Conversational Partners.” In Pragmatic Markers and Propositional Attitude, ed. by Gisle Andersen and Fretheim Thorstein, 207–237. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talbot, Mary
2007 Media Discourse: Representation and Interaction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, John
1995 The Media and Modernity: A Social Theory of the Media. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Thornborrow, Joanna, and Martin Montgomery
2010 “Introduction.” Discourse & Communication 4: 99. DOI logo, [URL].Google Scholar
Tolson, Andrew
2006 Media Talk: Spoken Discourse in TV and Radio. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Bergillos, Ignacio
2019. Rethinking Vox-Pops in Television News Evolution of Person-on-the-Street Interviews in Spanish News Programs. Journalism Practice 13:9 ► pp. 1057 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.