Monologic follow-ups in political macro-discourse
The US anti-terrorist discourse as a case in point
Follow-ups have been often considered a primarily dialogic/conversational phenomenon. In this chapter I demonstrate that the concept of the follow-up could be extended to cover monologic discourses as well, especially those in which the speaker realizes a macro-goal over a number of texts produced in different contextual conditions. These dynamically evolving conditions make the speaker – as happens in dialogue – continually update and redefine her rhetorical choices to maintain realization of the macro-goal intact. Such an approach subsumes a ‘dialogic’ relation between the speaker and the shifting discourse context – rather than between the speaker and her specific interlocutor – and views follow-up as an instance of rhetoric that has been forcibly modified from the previous/initial instance, to keep enacting the speaker’s macro-goal against requirements of the new context. As an illustration, I show how monologic follow-ups work in G.W. Bush’s War-on-Terror discourse. In particular, I discuss how the macro-goal of Bush’s 2003-04 rhetoric of the Iraq War (legitimization of the pre-emptive military strike and the later US involvement) has been maintained in the ‘follow-up discourse’ responding to loss of the initial legitimization premise, i.e. the alleged possession of weapons of mass destruction by the Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein.
References (59)
References
Bacevich, Andrew. 2010. Washington Rules: America’s Path to Permanent War. New York: Metropolitan Books.
Baumer, Eric, Mark Sueyoshi and Bill Tomlinson. 2011. “Bloggers and Readers Blogging Together: Collaborative Co-Creation of Political Blogs.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work 20: 1–36. 

Bednarek, Monika. 2006. Evaluation in Media Discourse: Analysis of a Newspaper Corpus. London: Continuum.
Berlin, Lawrence N. 2013. Following Up in Political Debates. Paper presented at the 13th IPrA Conference, New Delhi [panel: Follow-Ups in Mediated Political Discourse
].
Cap, Piotr. 2006. Legitimization in Political Discourse: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective on the Modern US War Rhetoric. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.
Cap, Piotr. 2008. “Towards the Proximization Model of the Analysis of Legitimization in Political Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 40: 17–41. 

Cap, Piotr. 2010. “Axiological Aspects of Proximization. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 392–407. 

Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
Chilton, Paul. 2011. Deictic Space Theory (DST): the Fundamental Theory and its Applications. Paper presented at the 42nd Poznań Linguistic Meeting, Poznań.
Chilton, Paul. 2014. Language, Space and Mind: The Conceptual Geometry of Linguistic Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Dynel, Marta. 2014. “Participation Framework Underlying YouTube Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 73: 37–52. 

Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. London: Polity Press.
Festinger, Leon. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Fetzer, Anita. 2012. “Quotations in Monologic and Dialogic Political Discourse.” In Follow-Ups across Discourse Domains: A Cross-Cultural Exploration of Their Forms and Functions, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Elisabeth Reber, 72–86. [URL]
Fetzer, Anita, Elda Weizman & Elisabeth Reber (eds.). 2012. Follow-Ups across Discourse Domains: A Cross-Cultural Exploration of Their Forms and Functions. [URL]
Fetzer, Anita and Peter Bull. 2013. “Political Interviews in Context.” In Analyzing Genres in Political Communication: Theory and Practice, ed. by Piotr Cap and Urszula Okulska, 73–99. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 

Fetzer, Anita and Etsuko Oishi (eds.). 2014. Evidentiality in Discourse. Special issue of Intercultural Pragmatics (11(3)). 

Filardo Llamas, Laura. 2010. “Discourse Worlds in Northern Ireland: The Legitimisation of the 1998 Agreement. In Political Discourse and Conflict Resolution. Debating Peace in Northern Ireland, ed. by Katy Hayward and Catherine O’Donnell, 62–76. London: Routledge.
Filardo Llamas, Laura. 2013. “‘Committed to the Ideals of 1916’. The Language of Paramilitary Groups: The Case of the Irish Republican Army.” Critical Discourse Studies 10: 1–17. 

Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Granato, Luisa and Alejandro Parini. 2013. Online Follow-Ups as Evaluative Reactions to Presidential Public Discourses. Paper presented at the 13th IPrA Conference, New Delhi [panel: Follow-Ups in Mediated Political Discourse
].
Harré, Rom and Luk van Langenhove. 1999. Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Action. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hart, Christopher. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave. 

Hart, Christopher and Piotr Cap (eds.). 2014. Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies. London: Bloomsbury.
Herring, Susan. 2010. “Computer-Mediated Conversation: Introduction and Overview.” Language@Internet 7: [URL]
Hodges, Adam. 2011. The ‘War on Terror’ Narrative: Discourse and Intertextuality in the Construction and Contestation of Sociopolitical Reality. New York: Oxford University Press. 

Hyland, Ken. 1998. “Persuasion and Context: The Pragmatics of Academic Metadiscourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 30: 437–455. 

Hyland, Ken. 2000. Disciplinary Discourses. Social Interactions in Academic Writing. London: Longman.
Janney, Richard W. 2012. “Columbine Revisited: Follow-Ups and the Fractalization of Events in the Modern Media”. In Follow-Ups across Discourse Domains: A Cross-Cultural Exploration of Their Forms and Functions, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Elisabeth Reber, 134–150. [URL]
Jowett, Garth and Victoria O’Donnell. 1992. Propaganda and Persuasion. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Kecskes, Istvan. 2000. “A Cognitive-Pragmatic Approach to Situation-Bound Utterances.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 605–625. 

Koller, Veronika. 2008. Lesbian Discourses: Images of A Community. London: Routledge.
Linell, Per. 2009. Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically. Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Lomborg, Stine. 2009. “Navigating the Blogosphere: Towards a Genre-Based Typology of Weblogs. First Monday 14: [URL] 

Mey, Jacob. 2001. Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Mey, Jacob. 2013. Sequential Acts. Paper presented at the 13th IPrA Conference, New Delhi [panel: Follow-Ups in Mediated Political Discourse
].
Morrish, Elizabeth and Helen Sauntson. 2007. New Perspectives on Language and Sexual Identity. Basingstoke: Palgrave. 

Oishi, Etsuko. 2013. Follow-Ups as Illocutionary Acts in Political Discourse. Paper presented at the 13th IPrA Conference, New Delhi [panel: Follow-Ups in Mediated Political Discourse
].
Park, Joseph Sung-Yul and Mary Bucholtz. 2009. “Public Transcripts: Entextualization and Linguistic Representation in Institutional Contexts.” Text & Talk 5: 485–502. 

Patzelt, Carolin. 2011. “‘Souhaitez-vous que je finisse une frase?’. Fragestrukturen im französischen Politainment am Beispiel des débat télévisé Sarkozy-Royal 2007.” In Gli uomini si legano per la lingua, ed. by Claudia Frevel, Franz-Josef Klein and Carolin Patzelt, 353–369. Stuttgart: Ibidem.
Reisigl Martin and Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Anti-Semitism. London: Routledge.
Silberstein, Sandra. 2004. War of Words. London: Routledge. 

Sinclair, John & Malcolm Coulthard. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Swales, John. 1995. “The Role of the Textbook in EAP Writing Research.” English for Specific Purposes 14: 3–18. 

Van Dijk, Teun. 2014. “Discourse-Cognition-Society: Current State and Prospects of the Socio-Cognitive Approach to Discourse. In Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by Christopher Hart and Piotr Cap. London: Bloomsbury.
Wodak, Ruth (ed.). 2012. Critical Discourse Analysis (4 volumes). London: Sage.
Wodak, Ruth and Michael Meyer (eds.). 2009. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. 2nd Edition. London: Sage.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Weizman, Elda
2023.
Recontextualization practices: A scale of directness.
Frontiers in Communication 7

Berlin, Lawrence N.
2021.
Positioning the Voices of Conflict: Language Manipulation in the Diálogos de Paz. In
Discourse and Conflict,
► pp. 291 ff.

Fitsanakis, Joseph
2019.
Growth and Uncertainty: The Impact of 9/11 on Intelligence and National Security Studies. In
9/11 and the Academy,
► pp. 243 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.