Part of
The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and functions of follow-ups
Edited by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Lawrence N. Berlin
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 259] 2015
► pp. 5984
References (59)
References
Bacevich, Andrew. 2010. Washington Rules: America’s Path to Permanent War. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
Baumer, Eric, Mark Sueyoshi and Bill Tomlinson. 2011. “Bloggers and Readers Blogging Together: Collaborative Co-Creation of Political Blogs.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work 20: 1–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, Monika. 2006. Evaluation in Media Discourse: Analysis of a Newspaper Corpus. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Berlin, Lawrence N. 2011. “Fighting Words: Hybrid Discourse and Discourse Processes.” In Context and Contexts, ed. by Anita Fetzer and Etsuko Oishi, 41–65. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Following Up in Political Debates. Paper presented at the 13th IPrA Conference, New Delhi [panel: Follow-Ups in Mediated Political Discourse ].
Cap, Piotr. 2006. Legitimization in Political Discourse: A Cross-Disciplinary Perspective on the Modern US War Rhetoric. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
. 2008. “Towards the Proximization Model of the Analysis of Legitimization in Political Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 40: 17–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Axiological Aspects of Proximization. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 392–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Proximization: The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cap, Piotr and Urszula Okulska (eds.). 2013. Analyzing Genres in Political Communication: Theory and Practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2011. Deictic Space Theory (DST): the Fundamental Theory and its Applications. Paper presented at the 42nd Poznań Linguistic Meeting, Poznań.
. 2014. Language, Space and Mind: The Conceptual Geometry of Linguistic Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunmire, Patricia. 2011. Projecting the Future through Political Discourse: The Case of the Bush Doctrine. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dynel, Marta. 2014. “Participation Framework Underlying YouTube Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 73: 37–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Festinger, Leon. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita. 2012. “Quotations in Monologic and Dialogic Political Discourse.” In Follow-Ups across Discourse Domains: A Cross-Cultural Exploration of Their Forms and Functions, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Elisabeth Reber, 72–86. [URL]Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita, Elda Weizman & Elisabeth Reber (eds.). 2012. Follow-Ups across Discourse Domains: A Cross-Cultural Exploration of Their Forms and Functions. [URL]Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita and Peter Bull. 2013. “Political Interviews in Context.” In Analyzing Genres in Political Communication: Theory and Practice, ed. by Piotr Cap and Urszula Okulska, 73–99. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita and Etsuko Oishi (eds.). 2014. Evidentiality in Discourse. Special issue of Intercultural Pragmatics (11(3)). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filardo Llamas, Laura. 2010. “Discourse Worlds in Northern Ireland: The Legitimisation of the 1998 Agreement. In Political Discourse and Conflict Resolution. Debating Peace in Northern Ireland, ed. by Katy Hayward and Catherine O’Donnell, 62–76. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2013. “‘Committed to the Ideals of 1916’. The Language of Paramilitary Groups: The Case of the Irish Republican Army.” Critical Discourse Studies 10: 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giltrow, Janet and Dieter Stein (eds.). 2009. Genres in the Internet. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Granato, Luisa and Alejandro Parini. 2013. Online Follow-Ups as Evaluative Reactions to Presidential Public Discourses. Paper presented at the 13th IPrA Conference, New Delhi [panel: Follow-Ups in Mediated Political Discourse ].
Gruber, Helmut. 2013. “Genres in Political Discourse: The Case of the ‘Inaugural Speech’ of Austrian Chancellors.” In Analyzing Genres in Political Communication: Theory and Practice, ed. by Piotr Cap and Urszula Okulska, 29–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harré, Rom and Luk van Langenhove. 1999. Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Action. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hart, Christopher. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hart, Christopher and Piotr Cap (eds.). 2014. Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Herring, Susan. 2010. “Computer-Mediated Conversation: Introduction and Overview.” Language@Internet 7: [URL]Google Scholar
Hodges, Adam. 2011. The ‘War on Terror’ Narrative: Discourse and Intertextuality in the Construction and Contestation of Sociopolitical Reality. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 1998. “Persuasion and Context: The Pragmatics of Academic Metadiscourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 30: 437–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Disciplinary Discourses. Social Interactions in Academic Writing. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Janney, Richard W. 2012. “Columbine Revisited: Follow-Ups and the Fractalization of Events in the Modern Media”. In Follow-Ups across Discourse Domains: A Cross-Cultural Exploration of Their Forms and Functions, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Elisabeth Reber, 134–150. [URL]Google Scholar
Johansson, Marjut. 2007. “Represented Discourse in Answers. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective on French and British Political Interviews.” In Political Discourse in the Media: Cross-Cultural Perspectives, ed. by Anita Fetzer and Gerda Lauerbach, 139–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jowett, Garth and Victoria O’Donnell. 1992. Propaganda and Persuasion. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan. 2000. “A Cognitive-Pragmatic Approach to Situation-Bound Utterances.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 605–625. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koller, Veronika. 2008. Lesbian Discourses: Images of A Community. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kopytowska, Monika. 2013. “Blogging as the Mediatization of Politics and a New Form of Social Interaction: A Case Study of ‘Proximization Dynamics’ in Polish and British Political Blogs.” In Analyzing Genres in Political Communication: Theory and Practice, ed. by Piotr Cap and Urszula Okulska, 379–422. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krzyżanowski, Michał. 2013. “Policy, Policy Communication and Discursive Shifts: Analyzing EU Policy Discourses on Climate Change.” In Analyzing Genres in Political Communication: Theory and Practice, ed. by Piotr Cap and Urszula Okulska, 101–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linell, Per. 2009. Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically. Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.Google Scholar
Lomborg, Stine. 2009. “Navigating the Blogosphere: Towards a Genre-Based Typology of Weblogs. First Monday 14: [URL] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mey, Jacob. 2001. Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2013. Sequential Acts. Paper presented at the 13th IPrA Conference, New Delhi [panel: Follow-Ups in Mediated Political Discourse ].
Morrish, Elizabeth and Helen Sauntson. 2007. New Perspectives on Language and Sexual Identity. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oishi, Etsuko. 2013. Follow-Ups as Illocutionary Acts in Political Discourse. Paper presented at the 13th IPrA Conference, New Delhi [panel: Follow-Ups in Mediated Political Discourse ].
Park, Joseph Sung-Yul and Mary Bucholtz. 2009. “Public Transcripts: Entextualization and Linguistic Representation in Institutional Contexts.” Text & Talk 5: 485–502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Patzelt, Carolin. 2011. “‘Souhaitez-vous que je finisse une frase?’. Fragestrukturen im französischen Politainment am Beispiel des débat télévisé Sarkozy-Royal 2007.” In Gli uomini si legano per la lingua, ed. by Claudia Frevel, Franz-Josef Klein and Carolin Patzelt, 353–369. Stuttgart: Ibidem.Google Scholar
Reisigl Martin and Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Anti-Semitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Silberstein, Sandra. 2004. War of Words. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John & Malcolm Coulthard. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swales, John. 1995. “The Role of the Textbook in EAP Writing Research.” English for Specific Purposes 14: 3–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun. 2014. “Discourse-Cognition-Society: Current State and Prospects of the Socio-Cognitive Approach to Discourse. In Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by Christopher Hart and Piotr Cap. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Weizman, Elda. 2013. “Political Irony: Constructing Reciprocal Positioning in the News Interview. In The Pragmatics of Political Discourse: Explorations across Cultures, ed. by Anita Fetzer, 167–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth (ed.). 2012. Critical Discourse Analysis (4 volumes). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth and Michael Meyer (eds.). 2009. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. 2nd Edition. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Weizman, Elda
2023. Recontextualization practices: A scale of directness. Frontiers in Communication 7 DOI logo
Berlin, Lawrence N.
2021. Positioning the Voices of Conflict: Language Manipulation in the Diálogos de Paz. In Discourse and Conflict,  pp. 291 ff. DOI logo
Fitsanakis, Joseph
2019. Growth and Uncertainty: The Impact of 9/11 on Intelligence and National Security Studies. In 9/11 and the Academy,  pp. 243 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.